Literature DB >> 21346791

Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection.

Jizhong Zhou1, Liyou Wu, Ye Deng, Xiaoyang Zhi, Yi-Huei Jiang, Qichao Tu, Jianping Xie, Joy D Van Nostrand, Zhili He, Yunfeng Yang.   

Abstract

To determine the reproducibility and quantitation of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach for analyzing microbial community structure, a total of 24 microbial communities from a long-term global change experimental site were examined. Genomic DNA obtained from each community was used to amplify 16S rRNA genes with two or three barcode tags as technical replicates in the presence of a small quantity (0.1% wt/wt) of genomic DNA from Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as the control. The technical reproducibility of the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is quite low, with an average operational taxonomic unit (OTU) overlap of 17.2%±2.3% between two technical replicates, and 8.2%±2.3% among three technical replicates, which is most likely due to problems associated with random sampling processes. Such variations in technical replicates could have substantial effects on estimating β-diversity but less on α-diversity. A high variation was also observed in the control across different samples (for example, 66.7-fold for the forward primer), suggesting that the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach could not be quantitative. In addition, various strategies were examined to improve the comparability of amplicon sequencing data, such as increasing biological replicates, and removing singleton sequences and less-representative OTUs across biological replicates. Finally, as expected, various statistical analyses with preprocessed experimental data revealed clear differences in the composition and structure of microbial communities between warming and non-warming, or between clipping and non-clipping. Taken together, these results suggest that amplicon sequencing-based detection is useful in analyzing microbial community structure even though it is not reproducible and quantitative. However, great caution should be taken in experimental design and data interpretation when the amplicon sequencing-based detection approach is used for quantitative analysis of the β-diversity of microbial communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346791      PMCID: PMC3146266          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  46 in total

Review 1.  Microbial diversity and function in soil: from genes to ecosystems.

Authors:  Vigdis Torsvik; Lise Øvreås
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.934

2.  Metagenomic analysis reveals a marked divergence in the structure of belowground microbial communities at elevated CO2.

Authors:  Zhili He; Meiying Xu; Ye Deng; Sanghoon Kang; Laurie Kellogg; Liyou Wu; Joy D Van Nostrand; Sarah E Hobbie; Peter B Reich; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Composition and genetic diversity of picoeukaryotes in subtropical coastal waters as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Man Kit Cheung; Chun Hang Au; Ka Hou Chu; Hoi Shan Kwan; Chong Kim Wong
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  The rational exploration of microbial diversity.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Thomas P Curtis; William T Sloan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Accurate determination of microbial diversity from 454 pyrosequencing data.

Authors:  Christopher Quince; Anders Lanzén; Thomas P Curtis; Russell J Davenport; Neil Hall; Ian M Head; L Fiona Read; William T Sloan
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Evaluation of PCR-generated chimeras, mutations, and heteroduplexes with 16S rRNA gene-based cloning.

Authors:  X Qiu; L Wu; H Huang; P E McDonel; A V Palumbo; J M Tiedje; J Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability.

Authors:  A Chao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering.

Authors:  Susan M Huse; David Mark Welch; Hilary G Morrison; Mitchell L Sogin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 5.491

9.  Deep sequencing reveals differential expression of microRNAs in favorable versus unfavorable neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Johannes H Schulte; Tobias Marschall; Marcel Martin; Philipp Rosenstiel; Pieter Mestdagh; Stefanie Schlierf; Theresa Thor; Jo Vandesompele; Angelika Eggert; Stefan Schreiber; Sven Rahmann; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  A pyrosequencing-tailored nucleotide barcode design unveils opportunities for large-scale sample multiplexing.

Authors:  Poornima Parameswaran; Roxana Jalili; Li Tao; Shadi Shokralla; Baback Gharizadeh; Mostafa Ronaghi; Andrew Z Fire
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  149 in total

1.  Actinobacterial nitrate reducers and proteobacterial denitrifiers are abundant in N2O-metabolizing palsa peat.

Authors:  Katharina Palmer; Marcus A Horn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Macrophyte species drive the variation of bacterioplankton community composition in a shallow freshwater lake.

Authors:  Jin Zeng; Yuanqi Bian; Peng Xing; Qinglong L Wu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of the microbial community in the Hanford unconfined aquifer.

Authors:  Xueju Lin; James McKinley; Charles T Resch; Rachael Kaluzny; Christian L Lauber; James Fredrickson; Rob Knight; Allan Konopka
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Bacterial associates of two Caribbean coral species reveal species-specific distribution and geographic variability.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Anthony G Moss; Nanette E Chadwick; Mark R Liles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbial Community Analysis with Ribosomal Gene Fragments from Shotgun Metagenomes.

Authors:  Jiarong Guo; James R Cole; Qingpeng Zhang; C Titus Brown; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Vertical distribution of bacterial communities in high arsenic sediments of Hetao Plain, Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  Yanhong Wang; Ping Li; Dawei Jiang; Bing Li; Xinyue Dai; Zhou Jiang; Yanxin Wang
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Microbiome Variation Across Amphibian Skin Regions: Implications for Chytridiomycosis Mitigation Efforts.

Authors:  Arnaud Bataille; Larisa Lee-Cruz; Binu Tripathi; Hyoki Kim; Bruce Waldman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Microbial Community Composition and Extracellular Enzyme Activities Associated with Juncus roemerianus and Spartina alterniflora Vegetated Sediments in Louisiana Saltmarshes.

Authors:  Anthony J Rietl; Megan E Overlander; Andrew J Nyman; Colin R Jackson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.552

9.  Skin Bacterial Community Reorganization Following Metamorphosis of the Fire-Bellied Toad (Bombina orientalis).

Authors:  Arnaud Bataille; Larisa Lee-Cruz; Binu Tripathi; Bruce Waldman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  Comparative metagenomic and rRNA microbial diversity characterization using archaeal and bacterial synthetic communities.

Authors:  Migun Shakya; Christopher Quince; James H Campbell; Zamin K Yang; Christopher W Schadt; Mircea Podar
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.