Literature DB >> 25847604

Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening: Past and future.

Arnout R Alberts1, Ivo G Schoots2, Monique J Roobol1.   

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening remains a controversial topic. Up to now, there is worldwide consensus on the statement that the harms of population-based screening, mainly as a result of overdiagnosis (the detection of clinically insignificant tumors that would have never caused any symptoms), outweigh the benefits. However, worldwide opportunistic screening takes place on a wide scale. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer showed a reduction in prostate cancer mortality through prostate-specific antigen based-screening. These population-based data need to be individualized in order to avoid screening in those who cannot benefit and start screening in those who will. For now, lacking a more optimal screening approach, screening should only be started after the process of shared decision-making. The focus of future research is the reduction of unnecessary testing and overdiagnosis by further research to better biomarkers and the value of the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, potentially combined in already existing prostate-specific antigen-based multivariate risk prediction models.
© 2015 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PSA; guidelines; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; risk assessment; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25847604     DOI: 10.1111/iju.12750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  25 in total

Review 1.  What's new in screening in 2015?

Authors:  Sigrid V Carlsson; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

2.  Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.

Authors:  Frank-Jan H Drost; Daniël F Osses; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Monique J Roobol; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-25

3.  Risk of Prostate Cancer-related Death Following a Low PSA Level in the PLCO Trial.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Amanda Black; Rebecca Landy; Lauren C Houghton; Christine D Berg; Robert L Grubb
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-01-29

4.  Expression and clinical significance of KLK5-8 in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Shu Lei; Qi Zhang; Fufen Yin; Xiangjun He; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Total, free, and complexed prostate-specific antigen levels among US men, 2007-2010.

Authors:  David A Lacher; Jeffery P Hughes
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Contemporary Selection Criteria in Prostate Cancer Patients Eligible for Active Surveillance: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Yelin Mulati; Lingyun Zhai; Yuke Chen; Yu Wang; Juefei Feng; Wei Yu; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  A comprehensive prostate biopsy standardization system according to quantitative multiparametric MRI and PSA value: P.R.O.S.T score.

Authors:  Chao Liang; Yuhao Wang; Lei Ding; Meiling Bao; Gong Cheng; Pengfei Shao; Lixin Hua; Bianjiang Liu; Jie Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Advances in Multiplexed Paper-Based Analytical Devices for Cancer Diagnosis: A Review of Technological Developments.

Authors:  Nihan Yonet-Tanyeri; Benjamin Z Ahlmark; Steven R Little
Journal:  Adv Mater Technol       Date:  2021-04-21

9.  MRI-targeted biopsy for detecting prostate cancer: have the guidelines changed our practices and our prostate cancer detection rate?

Authors:  Michael Baboudjian; Quentin Bandelier; Bastien Gondran-Tellier; Rony Abdallah; Floriane Michel; Pierre Clement Sichez; Eugenie Di-Crocco; Akram Akiki; Sarah Gaillet; Veronique Delaporte; Marc Andre; Laurent Daniel; Gilles Karsenty; Eric Lechevallier; Romain Boissier
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Does greater patient involvement in healthcare decision-making affect malpractice complaints? A large case vignette survey.

Authors:  Søren Birkeland; Marie Bismark; Michael J Barry; Sören Möller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.