Literature DB >> 25846740

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery through the umbilicus is associated with a higher incidence of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

S A Antoniou1,2,3, S Morales-Conde4, G A Antoniou5, F A Granderath6, F Berrevoet7, F E Muysoms8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has been developed with the objective to reduce surgical trauma, decrease associated surgical stress and to improve cosmetic outcome. However, concerns have been raised regarding the risk of trocar-site hernia following this approach. Previous meta-analyses have suggested a trend toward higher hernia rates, but have failed to demonstrate a significant difference between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery.
METHOD: Medline, AMED, CINAHL and CENTRAL were searched up to May 2014. Randomized controlled trials comparing single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery were considered for inclusion. Studies with patients aged less than 18 years and those reporting on robotic surgery were disregarded. Pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to measure the comparative risk of trocar-site hernia following single-incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery.
RESULTS: Nineteen randomized trials encompassing 1705 patients were included. Trocar-site hernia occurred in 2.2% of patients in the single-incision group and in 0.7% of patients in the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.00-5.08, p = 0.05). Sensitivity analysis of quality randomized trials validated the outcome estimates of the primary analysis. There was no heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 0%) and no evidence of publication bias.
CONCLUSION: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery involving entry into the peritoneal cavity through the umbilicus is associated with a slightly higher risk of trocar-site hernia than conventional laparoscopy. Its effect on long-term morbidity and quality of life is a matter for further investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia; Incisional; Laparoscopy; Single-incision; Single-site; Trocar-site

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25846740     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-015-1371-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  53 in total

1.  Access-related complications - an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.442

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Jai Deep Thakur; Mahak Garg; Geetha R Menon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Incisional hernia and fascial defect following laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  A Coda; M Bossotti; F Ferri; R Mattio; G Ramellini; A Poma; F Quaglino; C Filippa; A Bona
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Fernando Athayde Veloso Madureira; José Eduardo Ferreira Manso; Delta Madureira Fo; Antonio Carlos Garrido Iglesias
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations.

Authors:  Chong-Chi Chiu; Wei-Jei Lee; Weu Wang; Po-Li Wei; Ming-Te Huang
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Omentum herniation at a 2-mm trocar site.

Authors:  Torbjörn Backman; Einar Arnbjörnsson; Carl M Kullendorff
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 8.  Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; S Thrumurthy; L Muirhead; J Kinross; P Paraskeva
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L N Jørgensen; J Rosenberg; H Al-Tayar; S Assaadzadeh; F Helgstrand; T Bisgaard
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liangyuan Geng; Changhua Sun; Jianfeng Bai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  20 in total

1.  Comparing systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials with cohort studies: a paradigm of single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; G A Antoniou; F-A Granderath
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caiwen Han; Xinyi Shan; Liang Yao; Peijing Yan; Meixuan Li; Lidong Hu; Hongwei Tian; Wutang Jing; Binbin Du; Lixia Wang; Kehu Yang; Tiankang Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Does stoma site specimen extraction increase postoperative ileostomy complication rates?

Authors:  Wanglin Li; Cigdem Benlice; Luca Stocchi; Hermann Kessler; Emre Gorgun; Meagan Costedio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun-Bing Wang; Jin Xia; Jian-Ying Zhang; Jian-Ping Gong; Xiao-Mei Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Single-incision surgery trocar-site hernia: an updated systematic review meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis by the Minimally Invasive Surgery Synthesis of Interventions Outcomes Network (MISSION).

Authors:  Stavros A Antoniou; Josep M García-Alamino; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Michael Weitzendorfer; Filip E Muysoms; Frank A Granderath; George E Chalkiadakis; Klaus Emmanuel; George A Antoniou; Meropi Gioumidou; Styliani Iliopoulou-Kosmadaki; Maria Mathioudaki; Kyriakos Souliotis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoendoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP): stepwise transition from multi-site to single-site with the aid of the transurethral port.

Authors:  Yunfei Wei; Jingyuan Tang; Lin Yuan; Jian Su; Yang Zhang; Zhonglei Deng; Chen Zhu; Luming Shen; Ninghong Wang; Guojiang Xu; Yong Yang; Qingyi Zhu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Long-term follow-up after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Atakan Görkem Barutcu; Denis Klein; Maik Kilian; Matthias Biebl; Roland Raakow; Johann Pratschke; Jonas Raakow
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Task performance in standard laparoscopy in comparison with single-incision laparoscopy in a modified skills trainer.

Authors:  Andrew S Wright; Saurabh Khandelwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

10.  Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Zijia Song; You Li; Kun Liu; Yimei Jiang; Yiqing Shi; Xiaopin Ji; Tao Zhang; Haoxuan Wu; Yi Shi; Ren Zhao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.