Yun-Bing Wang1, Jin Xia1, Jian-Ying Zhang2, Jian-Ping Gong1, Xiao-Mei Wang3. 1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 2. Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 3. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. fcdc2016@163.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases. METHODS: Several databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies on the use of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery to treat liver diseases from their inception until March 24, 2016. The primary outcomes were the operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, rate of postoperative complications, median length of postoperative stay, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, volume of postoperative drainage, and postoperative drainage time. The study-specific effect sizes and their 95 % confidence interval were all combined to calculate the pooled value by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included, which involved 277 patients. The total and subgroup data were combined by meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that single-port and multi-port laparoscopic liver surgery for treating liver diseases did not differ in terms of operative time (P = 0.48), rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.56), median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.80), and recovery time of gastrointestinal function (P = 0.54). For liver diseases, the single-port group exhibited a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than that presented by the multi-port group (P = 0.0006). In the hepatic resection subgroup, a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss was noted in the single-port group (P < 0.0001). By contrast, in the hepatic cyst subgroup, the single-port group showed a higher volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.02) but a shorter median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.02). The findings of the potential subgroup analysis in these outcomes were consistent with the total data. CONCLUSION: Compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery, the single-port method showed comparable effectiveness and safety for the treatment of liver diseases in terms of current evidence.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for treating liver diseases. METHODS: Several databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies on the use of single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery to treat liver diseases from their inception until March 24, 2016. The primary outcomes were the operative time, volume of intraoperative blood loss, rate of postoperative complications, median length of postoperative stay, recovery time of gastrointestinal function, volume of postoperative drainage, and postoperative drainage time. The study-specific effect sizes and their 95 % confidence interval were all combined to calculate the pooled value by using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of nine studies were included, which involved 277 patients. The total and subgroup data were combined by meta-analysis. This meta-analysis showed that single-port and multi-port laparoscopic liver surgery for treating liver diseases did not differ in terms of operative time (P = 0.48), rate of postoperative complications (P = 0.56), median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.80), and recovery time of gastrointestinal function (P = 0.54). For liver diseases, the single-port group exhibited a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss than that presented by the multi-port group (P = 0.0006). In the hepatic resection subgroup, a lower volume of intraoperative blood loss was noted in the single-port group (P < 0.0001). By contrast, in the hepatic cyst subgroup, the single-port group showed a higher volume of intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.02) but a shorter median length of postoperative stay (P = 0.02). The findings of the potential subgroup analysis in these outcomes were consistent with the total data. CONCLUSION: Compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery, the single-port method showed comparable effectiveness and safety for the treatment of liver diseases in terms of current evidence.
Authors: Rosa M Jimenez Rodriguez; Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Mercedes Flores-Cortés; Francisco López-Bernal; Cristobalina Martín; Verónica Pino Diaz; Felipe Pareja Ciuro; Javier Padillo Ruiz Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jun-Jie Xiong; Kiran Altaf; Muhammad A Javed; Wei Huang; Rajarshi Mukherjee; Gang Mai; Robert Sutton; Xu-Bao Liu; Wei-Ming Hu Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-12-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Christian Benzing; Felix Krenzien; Georgi Atanasov; Daniel Seehofer; Robert Sucher; Ricardo Zorron; Johann Pratschke; Moritz Schmelzle Journal: GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW Date: 2015-12-15
Authors: Christof Mittermair; Michael Weiss; Jan Schirnhofer; Eberhard Brunner; Katharina Fischer; Christian Obrist; Michael de Cillia; Vanessa Kemmetinger; Emanuel Gollegger; Tobias Hell; Helmut Weiss Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 4.241