Literature DB >> 30043168

Clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Zijia Song1, You Li2, Kun Liu2, Yimei Jiang2, Yiqing Shi2, Xiaopin Ji1, Tao Zhang1, Haoxuan Wu1, Yi Shi1, Ren Zhao3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for right colon cancer is going to be considered as a new option. The potential benefits, clinical, and oncologic outcomes are still controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical and oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) for right colon cancer using propensity score matching analysis.
METHODS: From December 2013 to June 2017, 174 patients underwent laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy through a single-incision (n = 32) or a conventional (n = 142) approach. The data were prospectively collected and the patients were matched at a radio of 1:1 according to age, sex, body mass index (BMI), previous abdominal surgeries, comorbidities, ASA score (≤ 2/> 2), and pathologic stage.
RESULTS: No significant differences were observed in estimated blood loss, time to diet, postoperative pain score, length of hospital stay between the SILS and CLS groups. However, the SILS group showed longer operation time (175 (40) vs 145 (52.5), p = 0.011) and shorter incision length (4 (1.4) vs 7 (1.9), p < 0.001). There were 2 (6.3%) postoperative complications in the SILS group and 5 (15.6%) in the CLS group (p = 0.426). The pathologic outcomes were similar between two groups. The median follow-up period was 26.5 months in the SILS group and 34.9 months in the CLS group (p = 0.002). There were 3 recurrences (9.4%) in the SILS group and 3 (9.4%) in the CLS group. The 3-year disease-free survival rates were 92.4 and 93.8% (p = 0.984), and overall survival rates were 92.3 and 93.0% (p = 0.884) in the SILS and the CLS groups, respectively. No incisional hernia was observed during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS: Though single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer showed longer operation time in this study, it appears to be a safe and feasible option with comparable clinical and oncologic outcomes to conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcomes; Colon cancer; Conventional laparoscopic surgery; Oncologic outcomes; Single-incision laparoscopic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30043168     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6370-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Jensen T C Poon; Chi-Wai Cheung; Joe K M Fan; Oswen S H Lo; Wai-Lun Law
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Can Be Performed Safely and Appropriately for Colon Cancer: Short-Term Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Byung Mo Kang; Sun Jin Park; Kil Yeon Lee; Suk-Hwan Lee
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.878

4.  Oncologic Outcomes of Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopy for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Jung-A Yun; Seong Hyeon Yun; Yoon Ah Park; Jung Wook Huh; Yong Beom Cho; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Single-incision laparoscopy versus standard laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Hoyuela; Montserrat Juvany; Fernando Carvajal
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Hiroyuki Ishihara; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuko Ohno; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multi-incision laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis of 214 cases.

Authors:  Goutaro Katsuno; Masaki Fukunaga; Kunihiko Nagakari; Seichiro Yoshikawa; Daisuke Azuma; Shintaro Kohama
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  Cristiano G Huscher; Andrea Mingoli; Giovanna Sgarzini; Andrea Mereu; Barbara Binda; Gioia Brachini; Silvia Trombetta
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Randomized clinical trial of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  J Watanabe; M Ota; S Fujii; H Suwa; A Ishibe; I Endo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art.

Authors:  Fabio Cianchi; Fabio Staderini; Benedetta Badii
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  7 in total

1.  Thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer via transareola single-site endoscopic approach: results of a case-match study with large-scale population.

Authors:  Juyong Liang; Ling Zhan; Ming Xuan; Qiwu Zhao; Lingxie Chen; Jiqi Yan; Jie Kuang; Jian Tan; Weihua Qiu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.

Authors:  C Stabilini; M A Garcia-Urena; F Berrevoet; D Cuccurullo; S Capoccia Giovannini; M Dajko; L Rossi; K Decaestecker; M López Cano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.

Authors:  Chaoyang Gu; Qingbin Wu; Xubing Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Long-term outcomes of single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: results of a propensity score-based analysis.

Authors:  Yozo Suzuki; Mitsuyoshi Tei; Masaki Wakasugi; Yujiro Nakahara; Atsushi Naito; Manabu Mikamori; Kenta Furukawa; Masahisa Ohtsuka; Jeong Ho Moon; Mitsunobu Imasato; Tadafumi Asaoka; Kentaro Kishi; Hiroki Akamatsu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Systematic review of comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Wei-Hong Yang; Zhou-Guang Jiao; Ji-Fu Zhang; Rui Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Combined With Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Changgang Wang; Haoran Feng; Xiaoning Zhu; Zijia Song; You Li; Yiqing Shi; Yimei Jiang; Xianze Chen; Tao Zhang; Ren Zhao; Kun Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zijia Song; Kun Liu; You Li; Yiqing Shi; Yimei Jiang; Changgang Wang; Xianze Chen; Tao Zhang; Xiaopin Ji; Ren Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.