Literature DB >> 25844369

Strategies for weight maintenance in adult populations treated for overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leslea Peirson1, Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis1, Donna Ciliska1, Muhammad Usman Ali2, Parminder Raina2, Diana Sherifali1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Once weight loss is achieved, the challenge is to maintain this benefit. This review reports on the effectiveness of programs for weight-loss maintenance, as part of a larger review examining treatments for overweight and obese adults.
METHODS: We updated the search of a 2011 review on screening and management of overweight and obese adults. Four databases were searched. For inclusion, participants had to have lost weight in treatment and then been randomly assigned to a weight-maintenance intervention or control conditions. Studies from the 2011 review that met the criteria were included. Data were extracted and pooled (where possible) for outcomes related to weight-loss maintenance.
RESULTS: Eight studies were included. Compared with control participants, intervention participants regained less weight (mean difference [MD] -1.44 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.42 to -0.47), regardless of whether the intervention was behavioural (MD-1.56 kg, 95% CI -3.10 to -0.02) or pharmacologic plus behavioural (MD -1.39 kg, 95% CI -2.86 to 0.08). Intervention participants also showed better weight maintenance than the control participants in terms of waist circumference (MD -2.30 cm, 95% CI -3.45 to -1.15) and body mass index (MD -0.95 kg/m(2), 95% CI -1.67 to -0.23). Participants undergoing pharmacologic plus behavioural interventions were more likely to maintain a loss of 5% or more of initial body weight than those in the control group (risk ratio [RR] 1.33, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.54); no difference was found for maintaining a weight loss of 10% or more (RR 1.76, 95% CI 0.75 to 4.12).
INTERPRETATION: Moderate quality evidence shows that overweight and obese adults can benefit from interventions for weight maintenance following weight loss. However, there is insufficient evidence on the long-term sustainability of these benefits. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42012002753.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25844369      PMCID: PMC4382032          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20140050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  19 in total

1.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001.

Authors:  Ali H Mokdad; Earl S Ford; Barbara A Bowman; William H Dietz; Frank Vinicor; Virginia S Bales; James S Marks
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study.

Authors:  Natalie A de Morton
Journal:  Aust J Physiother       Date:  2009

3.  Comparing Costs of Telephone vs Face-to-Face Extended-Care Programs for the Management of Obesity in Rural Settings.

Authors:  Tiffany A Radcliff; Linda B Bobroff; Lesley D Lutes; Patricia E Durning; Michael J Daniels; Marian C Limacher; David M Janicke; A Daniel Martin; Michael G Perri
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 4.910

4.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

5.  Orlistat, a lipase inhibitor, for weight maintenance after conventional dieting: a 1-y study.

Authors:  J O Hill; J Hauptman; J W Anderson; K Fujioka; P M O'Neil; D K Smith; J H Zavoral; L J Aronne
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Differential response of African American and Caucasian women to extended-care programs for obesity management.

Authors:  Katie A Rickel; Vanessa A Milsom; Kathryn M Ross; Valerie J Hoover; Ninoska D Peterson; Michael G Perri
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings.

Authors:  J Hauptman; C Lucas; M N Boldrin; H Collins; K R Segal
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  2000-02

8.  Comparison of strategies for sustaining weight loss: the weight loss maintenance randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura P Svetkey; Victor J Stevens; Phillip J Brantley; Lawrence J Appel; Jack F Hollis; Catherine M Loria; William M Vollmer; Christina M Gullion; Kristine Funk; Patti Smith; Carmen Samuel-Hodge; Valerie Myers; Lillian F Lien; Daniel Laferriere; Betty Kennedy; Gerald J Jerome; Fran Heinith; David W Harsha; Pamela Evans; Thomas P Erlinger; Arline T Dalcin; Janelle Coughlin; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Champagne; Alan Bauck; Jamy D Ard; Kathleen Aicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Extended-care programs for weight management in rural communities: the treatment of obesity in underserved rural settings (TOURS) randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael G Perri; Marian C Limacher; Patricia E Durning; David M Janicke; Lesley D Lutes; Linda B Bobroff; Martha Sue Dale; Michael J Daniels; Tiffany A Radcliff; A Daniel Martin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24

10.  Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M H Davidson; J Hauptman; M DiGirolamo; J P Foreyt; C H Halsted; D Heber; D C Heimburger; C P Lucas; D C Robbins; J Chung; S B Heymsfield
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-01-20       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Long-Term Weight Maintenance Strategies Are Experienced as a Burden by Persons Who Have Lost Weight Compared to Persons with a lifetime Normal, Stable Weight.

Authors:  Maaike Kruseman; Noémi Schmutz; Isabelle Carrard
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.942

2.  Randomized trial of a phone- and web-based weight loss program for women at elevated breast cancer risk: the HELP study.

Authors:  Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Sandahl H Nelson; Sheri Hartman; Ruth E Patterson; Barbara A Parker; John P Pierce
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-03-24

Review 3.  Executive function in weight loss and weight loss maintenance: a conceptual review and novel neuropsychological model of weight control.

Authors:  Katelyn M Gettens; Amy A Gorin
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2017-02-03

4.  The impact of continued intervention on weight: Five-year results from the weight loss maintenance trial.

Authors:  Janelle W Coughlin; Phillip J Brantley; Catherine M Champagne; William M Vollmer; Victor J Stevens; Kristine Funk; Arlene T Dalcin; Gerald J Jerome; Valerie H Myers; Crystal Tyson; Bryan C Batch; Jeanne Charleston; Catherine M Loria; Alan Bauck; Jack F Hollis; Laura P Svetkey; Lawrence J Appel
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  A qualitative analysis of the role of emotions in different patterns of long-term weight loss.

Authors:  John Spencer Ingels; Sam Zizzi
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2018-04-04

6.  Two-year follow-up of a postpartum weight loss intervention: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ena Huseinovic; Fredrik Bertz; Hilde Kristin Brekke; Anna Winkvist
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Social facilitation maintenance treatment for adults with obesity: study protocol for a randomised-controlled feasibility study (SFM study).

Authors:  Anja Hilbert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effects of a web-based follow-up intervention on self-efficacy in obesity treatment for women.

Authors:  Sonja Rader; Thomas Ernst Dorner; Rudolf Schoberberger; Hilde Wolf
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Body size estimation of self and others in females varying in BMI.

Authors:  Anne Thaler; Michael N Geuss; Simone C Mölbert; Katrin E Giel; Stephan Streuber; Javier Romero; Michael J Black; Betty J Mohler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Group cognitive remediation therapy for adults with obesity prior to behavioural weight loss treatment: study protocol for a randomised controlled superiority study (CRT study).

Authors:  Anja Hilbert; Marie Blume; David Petroff; Petra Neuhaus; Evelyn Smith; Phillipa J Hay; Claudia Hübner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.