Literature DB >> 28810238

Long-Term Weight Maintenance Strategies Are Experienced as a Burden by Persons Who Have Lost Weight Compared to Persons with a lifetime Normal, Stable Weight.

Maaike Kruseman1, Noémi Schmutz, Isabelle Carrard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess dietary intake, eating patterns, physical activity and eating behaviors, and to explore strategies and perceptions of the experience of weight maintenance in weight loss maintainers (weight loss maintenance (WLM) ≥ 10% weight loss maintained for ≥1 year) and in matched controls with a lifetime stable normal weight.
METHODS: Volunteers (32) were recruited by a snowball procedure in this cross-sectional, mixed-methods study. Diet, physical activity, and eating behaviors were assessed with validated questionnaires. Strategies and experiences were investigated during interviews. Descriptive coding, thematic analysis (qualitative data) as well as descriptive analysis and t-tests (quantitative data) were performed.
RESULTS: Both groups had similar energy and macronutrient consumption. Those in the WLM group reported higher levels of exercise and scored higher on several dimensions of eating disorders. Four themes - 'food choices,' 'quantities and portion control,' 'physical activity', and 'burden' - emerged from the qualitative data. Both groups used similar weight maintenance strategies, but those in the WLM group experienced a higher burden, expressing effortful control which contrasted with the control group's confidence in their internal cues.
CONCLUSION: Our results show an additional burden related with maintaining weight loss compared to keeping a stable normal weight. They provide evidence to devise interventions that will address the difficulty of regulating intake.
© 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary intake; Obesity; Perception; Weight loss maintenance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28810238      PMCID: PMC5644938          DOI: 10.1159/000478096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Facts        ISSN: 1662-4025            Impact factor:   3.942


  47 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of resting metabolic rate in formerly obese subjects.

Authors:  A Astrup; P C Gøtzsche; K van de Werken; C Ranneries; S Toubro; A Raben; B Buemann
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss.

Authors:  M L Klem; R R Wing; M T McGuire; H M Seagle; J O Hill
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  What should you know about mindful and intuitive eating?

Authors:  Jennifer Mathieu
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2009-12

4.  Long-term weight-loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies.

Authors:  J W Anderson; E C Konz; R C Frederich; C L Wood
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  The dieting maelstrom. Is it possible and advisable to lose weight?

Authors:  K D Brownell; J Rodin
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1994-09

6.  Correlates of health-related quality of life, psychological well-being, and eating self-regulation after successful weight loss maintenance.

Authors:  Paulo N Vieira; Marlene N Silva; Jutta Mata; Sílvia R Coutinho; Teresa C Santos; Luís B Sardinha; Pedro J Teixeira
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2012-09-27

7.  Size acceptance and intuitive eating improve health for obese, female chronic dieters.

Authors:  Linda Bacon; Judith S Stern; Marta D Van Loan; Nancy L Keim
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2005-06

8.  Young adult weight trajectories through midlife by body mass category.

Authors:  Rahul Malhotra; Truls Ostbye; Crystal M Riley; Eric A Finkelstein
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

Authors:  A J Stunkard; S Messick
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 10.  Weight-loss outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Marion J Franz; Jeffrey J VanWormer; A Lauren Crain; Jackie L Boucher; Trina Histon; William Caplan; Jill D Bowman; Nicolas P Pronk
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2007-10
View more
  6 in total

1.  Patient insights into the experience of trying to achieve weight-loss and future expectations upon commencement of a primary care-led weight management intervention: A qualitative, baseline exploration.

Authors:  Marie Spreckley; Judith de Lange; Jacob C Seidell; Jutka Halberstadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Evaluation of Worksite Wellness Nutrition and Physical Activity Programs and Their Subsequent Impact on Participants' Body Composition.

Authors:  Victoria Sandercock; Jeanette Andrade
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2018-12-03

3.  Does diet strictness level during weekends and holiday periods influence 1-year follow-up weight loss maintenance? Evidence from the Portuguese Weight Control Registry.

Authors:  Rui Jorge; Inês Santos; Vitor Hugo Teixeira; Pedro Jorge Teixeira
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Determinants favoring weight regain after weight-loss therapy among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Joanna Bajerska; Agata Chmurzynska; Agata Muzsik-Kazimierska; Edyta Mądry; Beata Pięta; Maciej Sobkowski; Jarosław Walkowiak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Perspectives into the experience of successful, substantial long-term weight-loss maintenance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Spreckley; Jaap Seidell; Jutka Halberstadt
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2021-12

6.  The Long-Term Dietitian and Psychological Support of Obese Patients Who Have Reduced Their Weight Allows Them to Maintain the Effects.

Authors:  Katarzyna Iłowiecka; Paweł Glibowski; Michał Skrzypek; Wojciech Styk
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.