Literature DB >> 2584389

Standardization of yeast inocula with an electronic impedance counter.

C Eng1, P Valenstein.   

Abstract

The standardization of yeast inocula has been identified as an important variable in the performance of reproducible in vitro fungal susceptibility testing. We investigated the precision and accuracy of an electronic particle counter in preparing yeast inocula, with quantitative culture used as a "gold standard." Suspensions of Candida albicans and Torulopsis glabrata standardized with a particle counter at 10(6) counts per ml were highly reproducible when cultured quantitatively (coefficients of variation, 6.7 and 6.8%, respectively). Accuracies of particle counts, compared with those of quantitative culture, were -8.5 and +2.8% for the two species, respectively. Electronic cell counts were highly linear between 5 X 10(6) and 5 X 10(4) CFU/ml (R2 greater than 0.99). Multiple electronic counts of a single suspension of C. albicans had less variation than did multiple quantitative cultures of a suspension of the same organism (coefficients of variation, 2.4 versus 8.9%; P less than 0.01), suggesting that impedance counting is probably more precise than quantitative culture. Electronic particle counters can be used to prepare accurate, reproducible yeast inocula. The method may be more accurate and is more precise than other techniques commonly used to standardize yeast suspensions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2584389      PMCID: PMC267037          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.10.2397-2399.1989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods.

Authors:  J N Galgiani; J Reiser; C Brass; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Gordon; T M Kerkering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Variability of agar dilution-replicator method of yeast susceptibility testing.

Authors:  C Brass; J Z Shainhouse; D A Stevens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  J N Galgiani
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Counting and assessing the size of bacteria with an automatic particle counter.

Authors:  L O Kallings; K Lantorp; I Gunne
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand       Date:  1969

5.  Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Burmeister; M S Bartlett; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Turbidimetric studies of growth inhibition of yeasts with three drugs: inquiry into inoculum-dependent susceptibility testing, time of onset of drug effect, and implications for current and newer methods.

Authors:  J N Galgiant; D A Stevens
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B.

Authors:  D L Calhoun; G D Roberts; J N Galgiani; J E Bennett; D S Feingold; J Jorgensen; G S Kobayashi; S Shadomy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Variables influencing susceptibility testing of Cryptococcus neoformans to 5-fluorocytosine.

Authors:  E R Block; A E Jennings; J E Bennett
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; C W Kish; T M Kerkering; R A Fromtling; K Bartizal; J N Galgiani; K Villareal; M A Pfaller; T Gerarden; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Spectrophotometric method of inoculum preparation for the in vitro susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; T M Kerkering
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J H Rex; M A Pfaller; M G Rinaldi; A Polak; J N Galgiani
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; T M Kerkering; P R Goldson; S Shadomy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.