Literature DB >> 25840560

Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond Mortality.

Jeffrey M Sutton1, Gregory C Wilson2, Koffi Wima2, Richard S Hoehn2, R Cutler Quillin2, Dennis J Hanseman2, Ian M Paquette2, Jeffrey J Sussman2, Syed A Ahmad2, Shimul A Shah2, Daniel E Abbott3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As increased focus is placed on quality of care in surgery, readmission is an increasingly important metric by which hospital and surgeon quality is measured. For complex pancreatic surgery, we hypothesized that increased pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) volume may mitigate readmission rates.
METHODS: The University Healthsystems Consortium database was queried for all patients (n = 9805) undergoing PD from 2009 to 2011. Hospitals were stratified into quintiles based on number of cases performed annually. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with 30-day readmission.
RESULTS: The 30-day readmission rate for patients undergoing PD was 19.1 %. Stratified by volume, hospitals performing the highest two quintiles of PDs annually (≥56 cases) had a significantly lower unadjusted readmission rate than those hospitals performing the lowest quintile (n ≤ 23 cases; 16.7 and 18.0 % vs. 20.9 %, p < 0.05). On univariate analysis, readmitted patients tended to have higher severity of illness (p < 0.01) and longer index admission (10 vs. 9 days, p < 0.01). Age and insurance status had no significant association with readmission. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that higher severity of illness (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.77, p = 0.02), discharge to rehab (OR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.19-1.66, p < 0.001), and surgery at the lowest volume hospitals (OR 1.28, 95 % CI 1.08-1.51, p = 0.004) were factors independently associated with readmission.
CONCLUSIONS: Lower hospital volume is a significant risk factor for readmission after PD. To minimize the excess resource utilization that accompanies readmission, patients undergoing complex oncologic pancreatic surgery should be directed to hospitals most experienced in caring for this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25840560     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4451-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  10 in total

1.  Time Spent Away from Home in the Year Following High-Risk Cancer Surgery in Older Adults.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; Shoujun Zhao; W John Boscardin; Alexander Smith; Emily Finlayson
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Surgeon Characteristics Supersede Hospital Characteristics in Mortality After Urgent Colectomy.

Authors:  Richard S Hoehn; Dennis J Hanseman; Alex L Chang; Megan C Daly; Audrey E Ertel; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah; Ian M Paquette
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Composite Length of Stay, An Outcome Measure of Postoperative and Readmission Length of Stays in Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gregory A Williams; Jingxia Liu; William C Chapman; William G Hawkins; Ryan C Fields; Dominic E Sanford; Majella B Doyle; Chet W Hammill; Adeel S Khan; Steven M Strasberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  [Quality indicators for pancreatic surgery : Scientific derivation and clinical relevance].

Authors:  U F Wellner; R Grützmann; T Keck; N Nüssler; H E Witzigmann; H-J Buhr
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Cost-Effectiveness in Hepatic Lobectomy: the Effect of Case Volume on Mortality, Readmission, and Cost of Care.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Sutton; Richard S Hoehn; Audrey E Ertel; Gregory C Wilson; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Jeffrey J Sussman; Syed A Ahmad; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Lessons learned from 300 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies over a 25-year experience: the "safety net" improves the outcomes beyond surgeon skills.

Authors:  Roberto Santoro; Roberto Luca Meniconi; Pasquale Lepiane; Giovanni Vennarecci; Gianluca Mascianà; Marco Colasanti; Eugenio Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Surgeon Variation in Intraoperative Supply Cost for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Intraoperative Supply Cost Associated with Outcomes?

Authors:  David G Brauer; Kerri A Ohman; David P Jaques; Cheryl A Woolsey; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; M B Majella Doyle; Ryan C Fields; William C Chapman; Steven M Strasberg; William G Hawkins
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Does hospital volume affect outcomes after abdominal cancer surgery: an analysis of Swiss health insurance claims data.

Authors:  Kevin Wirth; Markus Näpflin; Sereina M Graber; Eva Blozik
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Readmissions after Pancreatic Surgery in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: Does Hospital Variation Exist for Quality Measurement?

Authors:  Ching-Yu Wang; Joshua Brown
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-09-24

10.  Comparison of pancreatojejunostomy techniques in patients with a soft pancreas: Kakita anastomosis and Blumgart anastomosis.

Authors:  Shoji Kawakatsu; Yosuke Inoue; Yoshihiro Mise; Takeaki Ishizawa; Hiromichi Ito; Yu Takahashi; Akio Saiura
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.