Literature DB >> 25839980

Correlation of Electrophysiological Properties and Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implant Patients.

Adrian Dalbert1, Jae Hoon Sim, Rahel Gerig, Flurin Pfiffner, Christof Roosli, Alexander Huber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To monitor changes in cochlear function during cochlear implantation using electrocochleography (ECoG) and to correlate changes to postoperative hearing preservation.
METHODS: ECoG responses to acoustic stimuli of 250, 500, and 1000 Hz were recorded during cochlear implantation. The recording electrode was placed on the promontory and stabilized to fix the position during cochlear implantation. Baseline recordings were obtained after completion of the posterior tympanotomy. Changes of the ongoing ECoG response at suprathreshold intensities were analyzed after full insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. Audiometric tests were conducted before and 4 weeks after surgery and correlated with electrophysiological findings.
RESULTS: Ninety-five percent (18/19) of cochlear implant subjects had measurable ECoG responses. Under unchanged conditions, recordings showed a high repeatability without significant differences between 2 recordings (p ≤ 0.01). Ninety-four percent (17/18) of subjects showed no relevant changes in ECoG recordings after insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array. One subject showed decreases in responses at all frequencies indicative of cochlear trauma. This was associated with a complete hearing loss 4 weeks after surgery compared with mean presurgical low-frequency hearing of 78 dB HL.
CONCLUSION: Extracochlear ECoG is a reliable tool to assess cochlear function during cochlear implantation. Moderate threshold shifts could be caused by postoperative mechanisms or minor cochlear trauma. Detectable changes in extracochlear ECoG recordings, indicating gross cochlear trauma, are probably predictive of complete loss of residual acoustic hearing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25839980     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  15 in total

1.  Hair cell and neural contributions to the cochlear summating potential.

Authors:  Andrew K Pappa; Kendall A Hutson; William C Scott; J David Wilson; Kevin E Fox; Maheer M Masood; Christopher K Giardina; Stephen H Pulver; Gilberto D Grana; Charles Askew; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Kevin D Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kendall A Hutson; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; William Jason Riggs; Robert Dwyer; Jourdan Taylor Holder; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Amanda Ortmann; Carla V Valenzuela; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael M Harris; Brendan P O'Connell; Leonid M Litvak; Oliver F Adunka; Craig Alan Buchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 6.  Electrocochleography in cochlear implantation: Development, applications, and future directions.

Authors:  Jason H Barnes; Linda X Yin; Aniket A Saoji; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-04

7.  Assessment of Cochlear Function during Cochlear Implantation by Extra- and Intracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Adrian Dalbert; Flurin Pfiffner; Marco Hoesli; Kanthaiah Koka; Dorothe Veraguth; Christof Roosli; Alexander Huber
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 9.  Ups and Downs in 75 Years of Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24

10.  Feasibility of Using Electrocochleography for Objective Estimation of Electro-Acoustic Interactions in Cochlear Implant Recipients with Residual Hearing.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; Leonid M Litvak
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.