Literature DB >> 16458449

Primary care patients' understanding of colorectal cancer screening.

Anthony Greisinger1, Sarah T Hawley, Judy L Bettencourt, Catherine A Perz, Sally W Vernon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the current level of awareness and understanding about colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among primary care patients in order to develop interventions to educate patients about options for CRCS, help them identify CRCS preferences and make informed choices about CRCS options.
METHODS: During the spring of 2001 and 2003, two sets of focus groups with primary care patients were conducted at a large multi-specialty group practice in Houston, Texas.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 42) in both sets of focus groups had low knowledge about CRC and expressed fear and embarrassment about CRC and CRCS. Attitudes towards the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) were mixed, with some participants considering it difficult to finish and others preferring the privacy it afforded. Some participants initially failed to recognize the difference between sigmoidoscopy (SIG) and colonoscopy (COL), and several endoscopy-specific barriers were identified such as fear of pain, embarrassment/humiliation, and dislike or fear of test preparation. Some participants felt that endoscopy was likely to be more effective than FOBT, and others clearly preferred COL to SIG. System-specific barriers to endoscopy (e.g. difficulty scheduling appointments and insurance coverage) were also identified. We found little change in the barriers reported by primary care patients, despite a two-year difference between focus groups. Participants also provided suggestions for improving CRCS including telephone, letters and/or email reminders from the clinic, videotapes and websites.
CONCLUSIONS: Future interventions focused on improving informed decision-making by educating primary care patients about the risks and benefits of specific test options and about the importance of early detection of CRC could prove to be effective for increasing CRCS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16458449     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2005.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  16 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

2.  Measuring Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening: What are the Implications for Moving Forward?

Authors:  Deborah Marshall; S Elizabeth McGregor; Gillian Currie
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  E-mail to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Within Social Networks: Acceptability and Content.

Authors:  Sarah L Cutrona; Joann Wagner; Douglas W Roblin; Bridget Gaglio; Andrew Williams; Rosalie Torres-Stone; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-04-03

4.  Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behaviors among Appalachian residents.

Authors:  Paul L Reiter; Mira L Katz; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Adana A Llanos; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 1.462

5.  Development Of An Educational Video To Improve Patient Knowledge And Communication With Their Healthcare Providers About Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Sarah Heaner; Paul Reiter; Julie van Putten; Lee Murray; Leon McDougle; Donald J Cegala; Douglas Post; Prabu David; Michael Slater; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Am J Health Educ       Date:  2009-07

6.  Colorectal cancer screening preferences among African Americans: which screening test is preferred?

Authors:  Richard C Palmer; Lynn A Midgette; Irene Dankwa Mullan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a mixed-methods analysis.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Kelly J Devers; Anton J Kuzel; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Construct validity and invariance of four factors associated with colorectal cancer screening across gender, race, and prior screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Jasmin A Tiro; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Physician-patient communication about colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael S Wolf; David W Baker; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Improving colorectal cancer screening by using community volunteers: results of the Carolinas cancer education and screening (CARES) project.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Cathy Tatum; Stephanie L Dickinson; David M Murray; Kristie Long-Foley; M Robert Cooper; Morgan Daven; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.