Tim J Puchtler1, Alexander Woolf2, Tongtong Zhu1, David Gachet3, Evelyn L Hu2, Rachel A Oliver1. 1. Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge , 27 Charles Babbage Road, Cambridge, CB3 0FS, U.K. 2. School of Engineering and Applied Science, Harvard University , Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States. 3. Attolight AG , EPFL Innovation Park - Bâtiment D, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Abstract
In spite of the theoretical advantages associated with nitride microcavities, the quality factors of devices with embedded indium gallium nitride (InGaN) or gallium nitride (GaN) optical emitters still remain low. In this work we identify threading dislocations (TDs) as a major limitation to the fabrication of high quality factor devices in the nitrides. We report on the use of cathodoluminescence (CL) to identify individual TD positions within microdisk lasers containing either InGaN quantum wells or quantum dots. Using CL to accurately count the number, and map the position, of dislocations within several individual cavities, we have found a clear correlation between the density of defects in the high-field region of a microdisk and its corresponding quality factor (Q). We discuss possible mechanisms associated with defects, photon scattering, and absorption, which could be responsible for degraded device performance.
In spite of the theoretical advantages associated with nitride microcavities, the quality factors of devices with embedded indium gallium nitride (InGaN) or gallium nitride (GaN) optical emitters still remain low. In this work we identify threading dislocations (TDs) as a major limitation to the fabrication of high quality factor devices in the nitrides. We report on the use of cathodoluminescence (CL) to identify individual TD positions within microdisk lasers containing either InGaN quantum wells or quantum dots. Using CL to accurately count the number, and map the position, of dislocations within several individual cavities, we have found a clear correlation between the density of defects in the high-field region of a microdisk and its corresponding quality factor (Q). We discuss possible mechanisms associated with defects, photon scattering, and absorption, which could be responsible for degraded device performance.
GaN microcavities with embedded
optical emitters have long been sought after as visible light sources
as well as platforms for cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED). Inherent
advantages of nitride-based microcavities include low surface recombination
velocities,[1] enhanced room-temperature
performance due to their high exciton binding energy (from 20 meV
in bulk GaN to ∼36 meV for QDs),[2,3] and emission
wavelengths in the blue region of the visible spectrum.[4] Recent progress with InGaN optical emitters include
strong coupling and polariton lasing in microcavities featuring distributed
Bragg reflectors (DRBs),[5] low threshold
lasing,[6] observations of Rabi oscillations,[7] and single-photon emission.[8] However, in spite of such progress the quality factors
in the nitrides are often more than an order of magnitude lower than
other III–V systems.[9−11] This, as well as the large joint
density of states of InGaN/GaN devices, causes lasing thresholds to
be significantly higher than for other III–V systems.[12,13]While the GaN materials system is notable for both strong
internal fields and dislocation densities, which would be expected
to destroy device performance in other material systems,[14] the performance of some nitride devices such
as light-emitting diodes and HEMTs is excellent and does not appear
to be limited by the high defect density. The mechanisms by which
devices are robust to dislocations are still debated.[15] In previous work, statistical analysis of a score of microdisk
devices found an anticorrelation between the quality factor (Q) of those devices and the overall dislocation density
of the material composing the sample. However, the reasons underlying
that anticorrelation were not fully discussed, nor were the dislocation
densities of individual disks measured.[16] Here we expand upon such work by the novel exploitation of cathodoluminescence
(CL) techniques to help make correlations between the locations of
threading dislocations (TDs) in individual microdisks with the Q of that specific device, allowing unprecedented understanding
of the effect of TDs in these devices.A schematic of the device
is shown in Figure 1. The microdisk membrane
has a thickness of 200 nm and encapsulates three layers of 2.5 nm
thick InGa1–N quantum wells (QWs) or quantum dots (QDs), with each layer
in the latter case having an approximate areal density of QDs of 1010 cm–2 and QD height of 1.2 ± 0.1 nm
based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies of QD epilayers grown
contemporaneously. A disk radius of 1 μm has been chosen in
order to create the smallest possible modal volume without a negative
impact on quality factor; the low modal volume is significant to both
lasing and coupling enhancement applications of the microdisks. The
composition, x, of the InGa1–N was approximately 0.2.
A 200 nm InGa1–N/InGa1–N sacrificial superlattice (SSL, y = 5.0%, z = 6.5% In) serves as the pedestal for the disk membrane,
which was capped by a thin (∼10 nm) GaN layer, followed by
a 20 nm Al0.2Ga0.8N etch stop layer. These structures
were grown atop n-doped c-plane GaN/Al2O3 pseudosubstrates, which have been deliberately grown
to achieve different densities of threading dislocations (3.0 ×
108, 5.6 × 108, and 5.3 × 109 cm–2) measured by AFM scans of silane-treated
pseudosubstrates.[17] Microdisk cavities
were formed concurrently from each sample using techniques that have
been previously described.[18,19] A photoelectrochemical
(PEC) etch was employed to remove the outer region of the sacrificial
superlattice and thus undercut the disk membrane, allowing for enhanced
optical confinement in the vertical dimension.
Figure 1
Schematic of GaN microdisk
with its respective epilayers. The suspended disk membrane has a thickness
of 200 nm and diameter of 1.2 μm, containing either three QD
or QW active layers. (Inset) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image
of a completed microdisk from the side. Scale bar represents 400 nm.
Schematic of GaN microdisk
with its respective epilayers. The suspended disk membrane has a thickness
of 200 nm and diameter of 1.2 μm, containing either three QD
or QW active layers. (Inset) Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image
of a completed microdisk from the side. Scale bar represents 400 nm.Six samples with differing InGaN
active regions were investigated, separated into two sets: three samples
contained QDs formed by “droplet epitaxy” grown on pseudosubstrates
of varying dislocation density;[20,21] and three QW samples
with differing growth conditions were grown on low-dislocation templates
(approximate density (3.0 ± 0.3) × 108 cm–2). The QW samples were selected to investigate whether
InGaN quantity or defect inclusion would affect cavity quality factors,
consisting of QWs with GaN capping layers grown at a single temperature
(740 °C); capping layers that were temperature ramped during
growth (725–860 °C) to reduce defect incorporation; and
a postgrowth NH3 anneal, causing fragmented QWs (fQWs).
A Student’s t-test comparing the mean quality
factors of the different QW samples suggests that there is no statistically
significant effect (p = 0.78) of the different growth
treatments on the analysis presented in this work. Further analysis
of the impact of the different active layers on microdisk performance
will be discussed elsewhere.[22]
Observation of
Dislocations
Microdisk resonators were investigated using
separate microphotoluminescence (μPL) and cathodoluminescence
setups. Markers on the fabricated samples were used to identify the
same disk in both setups, allowing disks measured in μPL to
be subsequently imaged by SEM-CL (Figure 2).
Threading dislocations act as nonradiative recombination centers,
and hence emission from the QWs in their vicinity is reduced.[23] This causes the appearance of dark spots in
the CL images (Figure 2a), allowing the number
and position of individual dislocations to be recorded for each microdisk
examined. It should be noted that there may be other causes of dark
spots in CL imaging, such as dirt and InGaN composition fluctuations
in QD samples. Careful sample preparation, consistent imaging conditions,
and plasma cleaning of samples reduce the incidence of misidentification
of dislocations, although may not eliminate it completely. The spatial
resolution of the CL images is dependent on both the size of the interaction
volume and the diffusion length of carriers in the material. While
the spot size may be measured, the diffusion length is not well known.
Nonetheless, comparison of AFM and CL data on similar samples indicates
that CL is well able to resolve individual dislocations in materials
of the dislocation density used here.
Figure 2
(a) Example plan-view CL and (b) corresponding side-view
SEM images of a highly undercut microdisk. Dark spots in CL are attributed
to dislocations and have had their positions marked. The central pillar
is visible behind dislocation 2. Note that dislocation size can vary
significantly. Scale bar represents 200 nm. (c) Overlaid μPL
and CL spectra obtained from the same microdisk at room temperature
showing WGM peaks. (d) Relationship between number of dark spots counted
in CL and number of whiskers counted in SEM for 18 samples (several
data points are superimposed). This has been fitted to y = mx, giving a value of m = 0.94,
with R2 = 0.5.
The presence of dislocations
also leads to deformations referred to as “whiskers”,
which decorate the underside of the cavity, as can be seen in Figure 2b.[24] The whiskers arise
from the PEC etch technique, which is employed to undercut the cavity
membrane; the threading dislocations act as charge trapping sites,
which inhibit photogenerated electron–hole pair separation
and subsequent removal of the sacrificial region around the defect.[25] The number of whiskers and dark spots in CL
has been counted for a range of disks in order to assess the strength
of correlation between the presence of a dislocation and formation
of a whisker. The relationship appears linear, giving a best fit with
gradient of 0.94 and an R2 of 0.53 (Figure 2d).(a) Example plan-view CL and (b) corresponding side-view
SEM images of a highly undercut microdisk. Dark spots in CL are attributed
to dislocations and have had their positions marked. The central pillar
is visible behind dislocation 2. Note that dislocation size can vary
significantly. Scale bar represents 200 nm. (c) Overlaid μPL
and CL spectra obtained from the same microdisk at room temperature
showing WGM peaks. (d) Relationship between number of dark spots counted
in CL and number of whiskers counted in SEM for 18 samples (several
data points are superimposed). This has been fitted to y = mx, giving a value of m = 0.94,
with R2 = 0.5.Q-factors were extracted from modal peaks
in PL, with the microdisk Q given as the maximum Q obtained from any mode. The CL spectra confirmed the frequency
values of the whispering gallery modes (WGMs); however the measured
quality factors were systematically lower than corresponding PL results.
Such a discrepancy is expected, due to both the carbon contamination
deposited on the sample surface from the electron beam and the increased
spectral jitter due to the changing electronic environment in the
disk as the beam position is rastered across the surface. Therefore,
the Q values reported in this work were obtained
using PL.As expected, finite-difference time-domain (FDTD)
simulations of a 1.2 μm GaN microdisk cavity suggest that the
highest Q modes, the WGMs, are confined to the periphery
of the disk membrane (Figure 3a). To confirm
that this modal pattern exists in the fabricated cavities, CL emission
spectra were taken at each beam position during SEM imaging of a disk.
The hyperspectral image created contains the emission spectra of the
disk for each position of e-beam excitation and hence allows comparison
of the spectra caused by excitation in the periphery of the disk relative
to those excited at the center (Figure 3b,c).
Images suggest that first-order WGMs are located at positions greater
than 0.4 μm from the center of the disk, consistent with the
results of the model. We define this part of the disk as the “outer
region” and contrast it with the inner region (material less
than 0.4 μm from the center of the disk) in the analysis below.
Figure 3
(a) FDTD
simulation of a first-order WGM in a 1.2 μm diameter GaN microdisk,
showing high intensity in the outer 200 nm of the cavity. (b) Panchromatic
intensity map of an imaged QW disk taken with the Attolight CL system
operating with 3 kV at 15 K. Scale bar represents 500 nm. Several
positions have been marked, with (c) corresponding to CL spectra in
which we can see WGM peaks in all positions at the periphery of the
disk, but only background emission when imaging the center of the
disk. Example monochromatic CL images taken at WGM wavelengths, (d)
464 nm and (e) 485 nm, show the greatest optical intensity when scanning
in the WGM volume, validating the FDTD shown in (a). By comparison
an image taken at a typical background wavelength of 468 nm (f) shows
near-uniform emission across the disk.
(a) FDTD
simulation of a first-order WGM in a 1.2 μm diameter GaN microdisk,
showing high intensity in the outer 200 nm of the cavity. (b) Panchromatic
intensity map of an imaged QW disk taken with the Attolight CL system
operating with 3 kV at 15 K. Scale bar represents 500 nm. Several
positions have been marked, with (c) corresponding to CL spectra in
which we can see WGM peaks in all positions at the periphery of the
disk, but only background emission when imaging the center of the
disk. Example monochromatic CL images taken at WGM wavelengths, (d)
464 nm and (e) 485 nm, show the greatest optical intensity when scanning
in the WGM volume, validating the FDTD shown in (a). By comparison
an image taken at a typical background wavelength of 468 nm (f) shows
near-uniform emission across the disk.
Impact of Dislocations on Cavity Q
Using
the CL-imaging technique illustrated in Figure 2a, the position of threading dislocations in individual disks was
recorded for 35 disks (13 disks with QW active regions and 22 disks
with QD active regions). Disks grown on lower defect material exhibit
higher Q’s, and those grown on high dislocation
density material (5.3 × 109 cm–2) have too low a quality to observe WGMs. The difference between
the Q-factors of disks containing QWs and those containing
QDs is statistically insignificant (t-test value p = 0.44) if made from samples of the same dislocation density.
Figure 4 is a plot of the microdisk Q against the number of threading dislocations in specific
regions of the disk. We can see that there is an anticorrelation observed
between Q-factor and dislocation density when considering
either the whole disk (Figure 4a) or just the
outer region (Figure 4c). The correlation is
stronger for TDs located in the outer region alone, although it should
be noted that the size of etching residues caused by TDs (discussed
later) is variable so that TDs that cause darks spots within the center
region may still affect the outer modal region of the disk, smearing
out this trend. There is no correlation of Q-factor
with the dislocations located only in the inner region (Figure 4b). These correlations suggest that the dislocations,
especially those located in the WGM region, play an important role
in limiting quality factors. Thus, we believe that the dislocations
play a more influential role on Q than the structure
of the InGaN active layer itself (whether it is QW, fragmented QW,
or QD).
Figure 4
Graphs of microdisk Q vs number of threading dislocations
with radial position (a) 0–0.6 μm, (b) <0.4 μm,
and (d) >0.4 μm for (red) QW- and (blue) QD-containing microdisks.
Linear fits to this data give R2 values
of 0.42, 0.0001, and 0.47, respectively. A schematic of, and representative
μPL spectrum taken from, microdisks of both (c) low and (e)
high dislocation numbers in the periphery of the disks.
Graphs of microdisk Q vs number of threading dislocations
with radial position (a) 0–0.6 μm, (b) <0.4 μm,
and (d) >0.4 μm for (red) QW- and (blue) QD-containing microdisks.
Linear fits to this data give R2 values
of 0.42, 0.0001, and 0.47, respectively. A schematic of, and representative
μPL spectrum taken from, microdisks of both (c) low and (e)
high dislocation numbers in the periphery of the disks.The spatial resolution of CL, leading to the data
displayed in Figure 4, allows us to focus our
experiments and simulations to the regions of the microdisks where Q demonstrates the greatest sensitivity to dislocations.
As stated earlier, the value of Q used in the plots
of Figure 4 are the maximum Q of the disk, for any mode. Since the highest Q’s
pertain to the WGMs at the periphery of the disk, it is not surprising
that the maximum Q is insensitive to dislocations
in the center of the disk (r < 0.4 μm),
where there is little overlap between the dislocation and the mode.We investigate the mechanisms by which the presence of threading
dislocations could negatively influence the microdisk Q; we first consider the existence of whiskers caused by the presence
of dislocations. FDTD simulations of a microdisk cavity with a pyramidal
whisker with a range of sizes (height of 150 nm, base widths of 100,
150, and 200 nm) located on the underside of the cavity membrane have
been performed, in which the position of the whisker has been varied,
from the center toward the edge of the disk. The simulation results
suggest that the whisker creates a radiative pathway for light escape
and show that the Q-factor of a first-order WGM decreases
as the whisker approaches the edge of the microdisk cavity, where
the mode is confined. Furthermore, the azimuthal position of the pyramid
affects the degree to which the Q decreases: the Q value decreases more if the whisker is centered at the
WGM antinode (i.e., high optical intensity) as opposed to on the node.
Larger whiskers cause a larger effect. Figure 5 summarizes the results of the FDTD simulations. Such simulations
corroborate our experimental observations that defects located in
the high-field regions at the edge of the disk can be responsible
for lowering the Q. Furthermore, the magnitude of Q-factor decrease we observe experimentally can be explained
by the formation of even small whiskers, if located within the WGM
volume.
Figure 5
Q vs radial position of a pyramidal defect for three
sizes of whisker (with a height of 150 nm and base widths of 100,
150, and 200 nm). Each size has a plot value for azimuthal position
corresponding to a node and another for positioning on an antinode.
(Inset) Side view of the field profile for a pyramid located at the
edge of the disk (r = 375 nm) centered on the antinode
of a first-order WGM. Light leaks into the whisker region and is subsequently
radiated, lowering the Q.
Q vs radial position of a pyramidal defect for three
sizes of whisker (with a height of 150 nm and base widths of 100,
150, and 200 nm). Each size has a plot value for azimuthal position
corresponding to a node and another for positioning on an antinode.
(Inset) Side view of the field profile for a pyramid located at the
edge of the disk (r = 375 nm) centered on the antinode
of a first-order WGM. Light leaks into the whisker region and is subsequently
radiated, lowering the Q.It is also possible for TDs to increase the impurity level,
both into the dislocation cores and in regions affected by the strain
fields around the dislocation, and hence have an increased absorption
coefficient relative to bulk GaN. While the strain fields associated
with TDs can extend over a >10 nm scale, significant increases
in doping occur over a scale of a few nanometers.[26] FDTD simulations were performed in which dislocations were
modeled as a 4 nm radius region of higher optical absorption, with
a linear attenuation coefficient α. No significant effect was
observed on cavity Q for values of α up to
109 cm–1, which is many orders of magnitude
greater than that expected for highly doped GaN (α < 104 cm–1),[27] and
as such, we conclude that the small size of the dislocation removes
any significant effect its optical absorption may have on the cavity Q.It should be noted that TDs cause other effects,
such as causing a shift in the absorption edge of bulk material through
strain, having their own energy levels associated with defect and
vacancy states at the TD core, and acting as nonradiative recombination
centers.[28,29] However, the magnitude of the shift in optical
absorption spectra relative to the bulk is largely insignificant,[30] and the energy levels associated with TD cores
are outside the wavelength range used in these cavities.[31,32] The whiskers formed during PEC etching confirm the role of TDs as
carrier traps and, thus, nonradiative recombination centers. Therefore,
while they do directly affect internal quantum efficiency, they do
not lead to a loss of photons and hence do not affect cavity quality
factor. Our conclusion is that the limitations to Q posed by the TDs is through the whiskers formed during PEC etching,
rather than any inherent property of the TDs themselves.
Limitations of
the GaN System
While we observe an anticorrelation between Q-factor and dislocation counts in the modal volume, we
also see an upper limit of Q-factors for these cavities.
Subsequent Q-measurements on dislocation-free cavities
grown on samples with substrates fabricated using epitaxial lateral
overgrowth give a Q-factor of 4800 ± 600, supporting
this limit. For future application to cQED, such as strong coupling,
the causes of this limit must be understood. The quality factor of
a cavity may be described by eq 1.where Qia denotes internal absorption losses, Qr denotes intrinsic radiative losses, and Qscat denotes surface scattering losses.Intrinsic radiative losses are determined by cavity design, decreasing
with increasing disk radius.[33] In this
regard, it is important to note that the highest value of Q is not necessarily the ultimate goal of the cavity design:
the quality factor of the cavity should serve to facilitate the ultimate
device application. For example, low-threshold laser designs typically
use smaller cavities to increase the spontaneous emission factor and
will, therefore, have greater intrinsic radiative loss.[34] While Qr can be
easily increased by changes in cavity design, this would be counterproductive
to the intended purpose of the cavity, and it would not affect the
total quality factor, as it is orders of magnitude bigger than the
other values. The value of Qr can be approximated
as described in eq 2.[35,36]where M is the azimuthal
mode number, J = tanh–1(s) – s, s = (1
– (1/n2))1/2, and n is the refractive index.For our microdisks emitting
at the observed wavelengths, this gives a value of Qr of ∼3 × 106. FDTD simulations
of such cavities with low absorption constants give a value of Q = 8 × 105 (Figure 6). The difference between these analytical and computed values is
explained by the approximations made in the simulation including loss
from horizontal surfaces and meshing errors.
Figure 6
(Blue trace) Simulated Q of a WGM at 420 nm vs RMS roughness at the periphery of a 1 μm
GaN microdisk. (Red trace) Q vs absorption coefficient,
in which the disks are modeled as having no surface roughness. (Dashed
line) Outer limits of absorption coefficients for GaN from literature
and corresponding cavity Q-factors.[40,41]
Surface scattering
depends on both disk morphology and surface roughness developed during
fabrication, which in turn depend not only on etching conditions but
also on the quality of etch mask used. AFM measurements of sidewall
roughnesses in similar cavities have given values of approximately
2 nm.[37] The plasma-based (inductively coupled
plasma) etch process used in the formation of the microdisks is well
capable of creating <2 nm surfaces,[38] should the mask be adequately smooth. Our cavities were produced
using silica masks with <0.2 nm surface roughness, and as such,
we believe that our cavities should be similarly smooth, although
AFM measurements of the sidewalls have not been performed. It should
be additionally noted that samples previously produced by our group
using the same methods have shown a measurable increase in sidewall
roughness identifiable in SEM with no negative effect on cavity Q, and as such, we believe that the roughness is low enough
not to limit cavity Q-factors. FDTD simulations were
performed with a range of edge-wall roughnesses, with sidewall geometries
modeled on those typically observed in fabricated devices as taken
from SEM images: the correlation length in the radial and vertical
dimensions is 30 and 300 nm, respectively. The relation of edge roughness
to simulated Qscat is given in Figure 6, in which no absorption effects were included in
the simulation and the top horizontal surfaces of the disk were assumed
to be smooth.Qabs can be approximated
by eq 3.[39]where α is the attenuation
coefficient, neff is the effective refractive
index of the medium, and λ is the wavelength of the mode considered.
Internal absorption can be significant in the nitrides for emission
below the band-edge of GaN due to moderate unintentional doping, leading
to increased electronic transitions between donor–acceptor
levels and structural defects.[27] For the
wavelength of modes observed at 460 ± 14 nm, absorption coefficients
have been stated in the range 30–350 cm–1 depending on growth conditions, dopant levels, and the substrate
used,[27,40−42] leading to approximate Qabs values between 103 and 104. Such a wide range may be explained by the variation in dopants
and structural defects between the samples in these studies, leading
to a wide variety of absorption in both the Urbach tail and free carrier
absorption regions.[27] It is also possible,
given the mode’s location at the edge of the cavity, that there
is a small contribution to the absorption coefficient from surface-state
absorption. As such, the extinction coefficient used here represents
an effective value that includes this component.It should be
noted for comparison that similar structures in other materials systems
have achieved significantly higher Q-factors: ∼5
× 105 and ∼105 for silicon and GaAs,[43,44] where the absorption coefficients are ∼10–4 and 1 cm–1, respectively.[45,46]Q-factors in these devices are limited by intrinsic
radiative and scattering losses, rather than absorption losses.To further consider the limitations from internal absorption, the
cavity structures were simulated with a range of absorption coefficients.
We can see in Figure 6 not only the relationship
between the absorption coefficient and cavity Q but
also the point at which the internal absorption of the cavity becomes
insignificant; for coefficients less than 1 cm–1 the intrinsic radiative loss of the cavity dominates the absorption
loss and, hence, sets the limit of Q for cavities
of these dimensions at ∼106. Using previously stated
values for the absorption coefficient of MOCVD-grown GaN gives the
simulated Qabs between 103 and
104, in agreement with calculated values. We can therefore
use the simulations and measurements of Q to examine
the limitations of the nitride cavities and the limitations of the
nitride material system itself.(Blue trace) Simulated Q of a WGM at 420 nm vs RMS roughness at the periphery of a 1 μm
GaN microdisk. (Red trace) Q vs absorption coefficient,
in which the disks are modeled as having no surface roughness. (Dashed
line) Outer limits of absorption coefficients for GaN from literature
and corresponding cavity Q-factors.[40,41]While scattering losses may be
reduced by refinement of the plasma etching technique, the absorption
losses pose a more difficult challenge to increasing nitride cavity Q-factor. Slight reduction of the free carrier absorption
may be achievable by alteration of material growth conditions, although
the sub-band-gap absorption in the wavelength range used for this
study is significant at all achievable dopant levels.[27] It may therefore be more tractable to alter the wavelength
of emission from the InGaN active layers to a lower energy, where
the GaN absorption would be reduced. However, if emitters in the blue-green
spectral region are desired, then only small decreases in absorption
may be achieved; using the growth technique applied here it is difficult
to produce high-quality InGaN QWs and QDs emitting at substantially
lower energy in order to achieve a significant decrease in absorption.To conclude, we have shown that we can identify the position of
individual TDs in microcavities using CL. Using this method to map
dislocation position across microdisks with a range of active layers,
we observed an anticorrelation of the number of dislocations in a
specific cavity with the cavity Q-factor. Simulations
and SEM-CL spectra confirm that, as expected, the whispering gallery
modes exist in the periphery of the microdisk cavities, and it is
the dislocations in this region specifically that affect cavity Q. We suggest that the presence of TDs does not inherently
cause a significant reduction in the Q-factor of
the microcavities, but that they do cause the formation of unetched
material during PEC etching, which subsequently causes optical leakage
from the cavity. This loss may be avoided by using alternative fabrication
methods. The limitations of the GaN system have been investigated,
and internal absorption has been shown to be the significant factor
in limiting cavity Q.Overall, in our investigation
we have shown that it is practicable to directly map materials defects
and inhomogeneities in a fabricated microdevice. Our study exploited
the resolution afforded by SEM-CL, allowing us to identify dislocations
and their impact on the local electrical and optical properties within
the cavities, and also cross-correlation with μPL to precisely
measure the quality factor and hence quantify the optical loss. By
combining these two techniques across a statistically significant
number of devices, we are able to directly link specific defect-related
features to device performance and to provide insights that could
not be achieved by the more usual approach of assessing the general
defect structure of the material from which devices are made. This
approach, in which for a specific microdevice materials properties
are mapped at high resolution and linked directly to measurements
of device performance, should be broadly applicable to other semiconductor
micro- and nanodevices, which will become increasingly important as
other new and developing materials systems with defects and inhomogeneities
are applied in photonics. This approach could certainly also utilize
other microscopy techniques.
Experimental Details
μPL measurements
were made using a pulsed frequency-doubled Titanium-Sapphire laser
emitting at 380 nm (76 MHz repetition rate, 200 fs pulse duration)
through a high (0.90) numerical aperture (N.A.) objective normal to
the surface of the microdisk. We estimate the pump laser spot size
to be 0.4 μm2. The collection path was through the
same objective, and a long pass filter was placed before the spectrometer
to remove any signal from the pump laser. All μPL measurements
were performed at room temperature, with almost all (>95%) measured
disks demonstrating whispering gallery modes superimposed over the
inhomogeneously broadened QD or QW emission. CL measurements were
obtained with a Philips XL30 SEM equipped with a Gatan MonoCL4 using
a low accelerating voltage (3 kV, spot size 1, beam current 250 pA)
and operating at room temperature, with the exception of the data
in Figure 3, which were obtained on an Attolight
CL system at 3 kV and a temperature of 15 K.[47]
Authors: S K Rhode; M K Horton; M J Kappers; S Zhang; C J Humphreys; R O Dusane; S -L Sahonta; M A Moram Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2013-07-09 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: M Mexis; S Sergent; T Guillet; C Brimont; T Bretagnon; B Gil; F Semond; M Leroux; D Néel; S David; X Chécoury; P Boucaud Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Alexander Woolf; Tim Puchtler; Igor Aharonovich; Tongtong Zhu; Nan Niu; Danqing Wang; Rachel Oliver; Evelyn L Hu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-09-02 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tongtong Zhu; Yingjun Liu; Tao Ding; Wai Yuen Fu; John Jarman; Christopher Xiang Ren; R Vasant Kumar; Rachel A Oliver Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 4.379