Literature DB >> 25834550

Validity of common ultrasound methods of fetal weight estimation in late pregnancy among women in Kwale, Niger Delta region, Nigeria.

Charles Ugwoke Eze1, Kester Ikechukwu Egwuanumku2, Kennedy Kenechukwu Agwuna3, Lazarus Odidi4, Kalu Ochie1, Innocent Uchechukwu Nwadike1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accuracy of some ultrasound equations used in our locality for fetal weight estimation is doubtful.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of common ultrasound equations used for fetal weight estimation. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A longitudinal study was conducted on selected Nigerian obstetric population at Central Hospital, Kwale between March, 2009 and January, 2011. Sonography was performed on 412 women with advanced singleton cyesis and measurements of BPD, HC, AC, and FL were obtained and figured into 12 common ultrasound equations for the estimation of fetal weight. The actual birth weight at delivery was recorded.
RESULTS: The highest intraclass correlation coefficient was generated by the Hadlock 5 and Hsieh 2 equations. The least mean absolute percent error was obtained with Hsieh 2 equation, followed by Woo 3, and Hadlock 5. These equations also had the least percentage error and the least range of limits of agreement in the same order with no significant difference between their mean fetal weight estimates and that of the actual birth weight (p > 0.05). All twelve equations had strong positive correlation with the actual birth weight with Nzeh 2 equation the least.
CONCLUSION: Hsieh 2 equation has the best accuracy in fetal weight estimation studied.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced Cyesis; Fetal Weight; Nigerian Population; Sonography; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25834550      PMCID: PMC4370149          DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v15i1.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Afr Health Sci        ISSN: 1680-6905            Impact factor:   0.927


  20 in total

1.  Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight.

Authors:  S Campbell; D Wilkin
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1975-09

2.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: comparison of bias, precision and consistency using 12 different formulae.

Authors:  N G Anderson; I J Jolley; J E Wells
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Estimated weight of the term fetus. Accuracy of ultrasound vs. clinical examination.

Authors:  W J Watson; A P Soisson; F E Harlass
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Computer-assisted evaluation of ultrasonic fetal weight prediction using multiple regression equations with and without the fetal femur length.

Authors:  J S Woo; C W Wan; K M Cho
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Fetal biparietal diameter: rational choice of plane of section for sonographic measurement.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R L Deter; R B Harrist; S K Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: accuracy of formulas and accuracy of examiners by birth weight from 500 to 5000 g.

Authors:  Juozas Kurmanavicius; Tilo Burkhardt; Josef Wisser; Renate Huch
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.901

9.  Incidence of fetal macrosomia and birth complications in Chinese immigrant women.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway; John Keogh; Rob Heard; Jonathan Morris
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.100

10.  Accurate ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight. Effect of head shape, growth patterns, and amniotic fluid volume.

Authors:  W J Ott; S Doyle; S Flamm
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.862

View more
  2 in total

1.  From Ebola in the slums of East and West Africa to NCDs, mental, child and reproductive health.

Authors:  James K Tumwine
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term: A comparison of shepard and hadlock methods.

Authors:  Abalaka A Aye; Teddy E Agida; Akinola A Babalola; Aliyu Y Isah; Nathaniel David Adewole
Journal:  Ann Afr Med       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.