| Literature DB >> 25834287 |
Christian Brandstätter1, Katharina Keiblinger2, Wolfgang Wanek3, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern2.
Abstract
AIMS: Litter decomposition and subsequenpan>t nutrient release play a major role in forest carbon and nutrient cycling. To elucidate how soluble or bulk nutrient ratios afEntities:
Keywords: Leaf litter decomposition; Microbial biomass; Microbial community structure analysis; Microbial respiration; Microcosm
Year: 2013 PMID: 25834287 PMCID: PMC4372839 DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1671-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Soil ISSN: 0032-079X Impact factor: 4.192
Initial beech litter chemistry of four different sites
| AK | KL | OR | PE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | (%) | 50.94 | 49.42 | 48.65 | 49.59 |
| N | (%) | 1.05 | 0.97 | 0.90 | 0.86 |
| P | (%) | 0.030a (<0.001) | 0.033 | 0.045 | 0.056 |
| K | (%) | 0.099 | 0.395 | 0.179 | 0.212 |
| Ca | (%) | 1.48 | 1.30 | 2.03 | 1.16 |
| Mg | (%) | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.13 |
| Fe | (mg kg−1) | 121.9 | 175.5 | 240.9 | 181.5 |
| Mn | (mg kg−1) | 103.8 | 985.2 | 521.2 | 292.8 |
| Zn | (mg kg−1) | 32.3 | 39.0 | 34.1 | 41.2 |
| C:N | 48.7 | 50.9 | 54.2 | 57.6 | |
| C:P | 1707 | 1494 | 1090 | 892 | |
| N:P | 35.0 | 29.1 | 20.1 | 15.8 |
Values represent means, with +/− SE in parentheses, different letters indicate significant differences between sites after Tukey’s HSD test (p < 0.05, n = 6)
AK Achenkirch, KL Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, OR Ort and PE Perg
Fig. 1Time course of a) Mass Loss %, b) NH4 +-N, c) total inorganic N (TIN) and d) respiration. An ANOVA was conducted for week 4 and 8 to detect significant differences between the four sites. Where brackets indicate a violation of the prerequisite of homogenous variances, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was computed (ns p > 0.05; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). AK Achenkirch, KL Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, OR Ort, PE Perg
Nitrogen and carbon pools averaged over all four sites during 8 weeks
| Weeks | N | C | NH4 + | NO3 - | TIN | NPOC | TDN | Cmic | Nmic |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 150.8 (4.3) | 7421 (66) | 4.22 (0.44) | 2.16 (0.43) | 6.38 (0.10) | 147.6 (3.6) | 16.33 (0.98) | 18.64 (2.67) | 1.22 (0.26) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 2.80 | 1.43 | 4.23 | 1.99 | 10.83 | 0.25 | 0.81 |
| 1 | 155.3 (4.9) | 7607 (130) | 1.37 (0.19) | 2.47 (0.29) | 3.84 (0.28) | 84.7 (4.8) | 9.15 (0.27) | 33.20 (1.97) | 2.67 (0.23) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.88 | 1.59 | 2.47 | 1.11 | 5.89 | 0.44 | 1.72 |
| 2 | 157.7 (5.3) | 7478 (127) | 1.46 (0.13) | 2.69 (0.22) | 4.15 (0.11) | 68.3 (4.2) | 7.71 (0.13) | 45.35 (2.27) | 4.92 (0.26) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.92 | 1.71 | 2.63 | 0.91 | 4.89 | 0.61 | 3.12 |
| 3 | 150.0 (5.2) | 7309 (122) | 0.31 (0.03) | 2.29 (0.17) | 2.60 (0.16) | 58.1 (4.3) | 3.59 (0.20) | 45.09 (2.25) | 4.89 (0.25) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.21 | 1.53 | 1.73 | 0.80 | 2.40 | 0.62 | 3.26 |
| 4 | 151.3 (5.2) | 7321 (119) | 0.15 (0.02) | 1.71 (0.07) | 1.86 (0.08) | 58.9 (4.1) | 3.21 (0.14) | 41.52 (2.29) | 5.24 (0.30) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.10 | 1.13 | 1.23 | 0.80 | 2.12 | 0.57 | 3.47 |
| 5 | 150.4 (5.5) | 7204 (146) | 0.40 (0.03) | 0.91 (0.05) | 1.30 (0.05) | 56. (4.9) | 3.15 (0.22) | 42.98 (0.58) | 4.70 (0.17) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.27 | 0.60 | 0.86 | 0.78 | 2.09 | 0.60 | 3.13 |
| 6 | 150.2 (5.7) | 7175 (148) | 0.38 (0.03) | 1.02 (0.11) | 1.40 (0.10) | 54.4 (4.1) | 3.01 (0.17) | 53.03 (1.43) | 5.30 (0.17) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.25 | 0.68 | 0.93 | 0.76 | 2.01 | 0.74 | 3.53 |
| 7 | 150.6 (5.4) | 7128 (158) | 0.39 (0.03) | 1.55 (0.15) | 1.95 (0.15) | 59.8 (5.3) | 3.80 (0.27) | 46.30 (0.63) | 4.41 (0.10) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.26 | 1.03 | 1.29 | 0.84 | 2.53 | 0.65 | 2.93 |
| 8 | 148.9 (5.3) | 6946 (134) | 0.21 (0.04) | 0.72 (0.07) | 0.93 (0.11) | 51.9 (5.2) | 2.99 (0.22) | 33.95 (2.14) | 5.04 (0.24) |
| (%) | 100 | 100 | 0.14 | 0.48 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 2.01 | 0.49 | 3.38 |
Values represent means of all sites with +/− SE in parentheses, units are mg per microcosm. For week zero a litter amount of 15 g dw was estimated, since the samples were taken out of the original litter pool. The percentage is given for each week while elemental C and N analyses were regarded as 100 %
TIN total inorganic nitrogen, TOC total organic carbon, TDN total dissolved nitrogen, C microbial biomass C, N microbial biomass N (n = 4)
Fig. 2Time course of a) non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) b) total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), c) ratio of NPOC and TDN (NPOC:TDN). The remaining graph d) represents a quadratic regression between TDN and the cumulative litter mass loss (ML). The values for TDN between b) and d) differ, since the first week was not used for mass loss determination. The outer lines of the regression curves indicate a 95 % confidence interval and the line in between is the regression line. An ANOVA was conducted for week 4 and 8 to detect significant differences between the four sites. (ns p > 0.5; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). AK Achenkirch, KL Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, OR Ort, PE Perg
Fig. 3Time course of a) microbial biomass C (C ), b) microbial biomass N (N ) and d) the microbial metabolic quotient (qCO ). The remaining graph c) represents a quadratic regression between NH4 + and microbial biomass N (N ). The outer lines of the regression curves indicate a 95 % confidence interval and the line in between is the regression line. In a) and b) an ANOVA was conducted for week four and eight to detect significant differences between the four sites, and in d) for week eight only. Where brackets indicate a violation of the prerequisite of homogenous variances, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was computed (ns p > 0.5; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). AK Achenkirch, KL Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, OR Ort, PE Perg
Fig. 4Principal component analysis of a) inorganic N-pools, CO2-respiration, non purgeable organic C, total dissolved N, microbial biomass C and N and b) the same variables including PLFA data. Data points (indicated as numbers in a) and points in b) represent litter samples from four sites at a) eight (week 0–8), respectively b) three (week 0, 4, 8) time points. The variables NH4+, NO3 -, CO2 and Nmic have been log-transformed prior to PCA calculation for a) and NO3 - and CO2 for b). Explanation of variance by means of individual principal components (PC) is shown through percentages. Numbers indicate time and letters sites. C microbial biomass C, N microbial biomass N, TDC total dissolved C, TDN total dissolved N, A Achenkirch, K Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, O Ort, P Perg
PLFA-contents of beech leaf litter of four sites at three time points
| Site | Actinomycetes | Fungi | Gram + | Gram - | Protozoa | FB-Ratio | Total PLFAs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 ( | |||||||
| AK | 0.20 | 9.93 (0.76) | 1.20 | 42.41 (2.70) | 0.264 (0.022) | 0.22 (0.03) | 54.01 |
| KL | 0.01 | 7.63 (0.09) | 0.83 | 42.39 (0.10) | 0.213 (0.014) | 0.17 (<0.01) | 51.07 |
| OR | 0.29 | 9.62 (0.71) | 2.54 | 43.54 (1.75) | 0.318 (0.042) | 0.20 (0.02) | 56.31 |
| PE | 0.21 | 8.71 (0.16) | 1.30 | 45.28 (0.28) | 0.329 (0.016) | 0.18 (<0.01) | 55.83 |
| Week 4 ( | |||||||
| AK | 0.32 | 18.12 | 4.41 | 30.60 | 0.499 | 0.48 (0.01) | 53.95 (0.85) |
| KL | 0.24 | 18.27 | 3.85 | 34.28 | 0.427 | 0.45 (0.01) | 56.74 (1.47) |
| OR | 0.41 | 18.77 | 7.11 | 31.05 | 0.466 | 0.46 (0.01) | 57.81 (0.95) |
| PE | 0.22 | 17.68 | 3.36 | 33.50 | 0.892 | 0.45 (0.01) | 55.65 (1.00) |
| Week 8 ( | |||||||
| AK | 0.37 | 18.88 (0.08) | 5.35 | 28.69 | 0.474 | 0.52 (<0.01) | 52.93 |
| KL | 0.42 | 18.33 (1.49) | 4.79 | 30.90 | 0.491 | 0.48 (0.05) | 54.92 |
| OR | 0.71 | 17.05 (1.09) | 9.14 | 29.68 | 0.489 | 0.45 (0.04) | 57.39 |
| PE | 0.31 | 16.72 (1.16) | 5.28 | 31.79 | 0.858 | 0.42 (0.04) | 54.96 |
Accounting PLFAs have been summed up to result in the assigned groups. Values represent means with +/− SE in parentheses, different letters indicate significant differences between sites for each time point after Tukey’s HSD test (p = 0.05). Except for FB-Ratio all units are nMol PLFA g−1 dw
FB-Ratio fungal bacterial ratio, AK Achenkirch, KL Klausen-Leopoldsdorf, OR Ort, PE Perg