| Literature DB >> 22402400 |
Thomas Schneider1, Katharina M Keiblinger, Emanuel Schmid, Katja Sterflinger-Gleixner, Günther Ellersdorfer, Bernd Roschitzki, Andreas Richter, Leo Eberl, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern, Kathrin Riedel.
Abstract
Leaf-litter decomposition is a ceEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22402400 PMCID: PMC3498922 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2012.11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Site and soil characteristics of the beech litter-sampling sites
| Location | 47°35′N 11°39′E | 48°07′N 16°03′E | 47°51′N 13°42′E | 48°14′N 16°15′E |
| Vegetation | Spruce-fir, beech | Beech | Mainly beech, conifers | Beech |
| Stand age (years) | 127 | 62 | 90 | 142 |
| Exposition | N | NNE | NE | SE |
| Elevation (m a.s.l.) | 895 | 510 | 700 | 370 |
| Soil type | Rendzic leptosols/chromic cambisol | Dystric cambisol over sandstone | Cambisol | Dystric cambisol over sandstone |
| Soil texture | Loam | Loam-loamy clay | Loamy silt | Silty loam |
| Soil pH 0–7 cm | 6.4 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 4.4 |
Abbreviation: a.s.l., above sea level.
Different sampling sites and their mean air-temperature (T) and precipitation (Prec)
| Achenkirch | 4th | 18th | −1.66 | 5.88 | 55 | 65 |
| Klausenleopoldsdorf | 5th | 27th | −0.11 | 9.64 | 37 | 46 |
| Ort | 27th | 19th | 0.88 | 11.0 | 51 | 57 |
| Schottenwald | 5th | 27th | 1.32 | 11.39 | 44 | 55 |
Abbreviation: Feb, February.
Samples were collected at the given dates in 2009. Climatic data were collected over a 3-month time period before litter sampling. Mean air temperature and precipitation were calculated by averaging the climatic data of this period.
Beech leaf-litter water content, pH and nutrient content at the four sampling sites in February and May
| Water content (%) | 73.07±0.6ab | 42.2±3.3c | 79.39±2.0a | 63.7±15.5ab | 57.0±4.1bc | 12.0±0.3d | 77.5±1.6a | 18.0±0.6d |
| pH | n.d. | 4.9±0.1cd | 4.7±0.1c | 5.3±0.1e | 4.5±0.1a | 4.6±0.1b | 5.2±0.1de | 5.2±0.1de |
| C (%) | 50.16±0.17d | 50.49±0.08d | 46.82±1.45bc | 46.12±0.68bc | 47.20±0.20bc | 47.70±0.26c | 45.47±0.39b | 43.44±1.13a |
| N (%) | 1.24±0.03d | 1.27±0.02d | 1.00±0.02b | 1.14±0.02c | 0.82±0.02a | 1.07±0.01c | 1.25±0.04d | 1.45±0.08e |
| C:N ratio | 40.31±0.76c | 39.87±0.63c | 46.76±2.32e | 40.64±0.97c | 57.75±1.25f | 44.42±0.49d | 36.43±1.19b | 29.96±1.30a |
| P (%) | 0.035±0.001a | 0.039±0.006a | 0.040±0.002a | 0.040±0.013a | 0.035±0.006a | 0.056±0.003b | 0.064±0.004b | 0.104±0.002c |
| C:P ratio | 1439.8±4.8d | 1318.6±197.9d | 1160.2±86.7cd | 1237.4±361.5d | 1361.2±200.7d | 853.24±42.42bc | 714.0±43.0ab | 418.6±17.3a |
| N:P ratio | 35.73±0.55e | 33.03±4.48de | 24.80±0.84bcd | 30.33±8.32cde | 23.62±3.86bc | 19.22±1.16ab | 19.59±0.55ab | 13.99±0.82a |
| PO4 (ng g–1 DW) | 11.51±6.15a | 14.09±1.55a | 14.87±4.97a | 9.87±4.14a | 22.73±5.39a | 90.30±6.93b | 9.38±2.48a | 113.66±6.29c |
| NH4 (μg g–1 DW) | 38.84±10.21b | 21.81±3.06a | 23.45±3.18a | 40.05±8.08b | 12.46±0.95a | 46.02±4.96b | 18.89±5.54a | 70.21±5.27c |
| NO3 (μg g–1 DW) | 4.39±1.84abc | 1.00±0.48ab | 7.31±1.87bc | 0.40±0.63a | 9.55±4.74c | 1.75±0.16ab | 5.09±2.14abc | 17.37±3.57d |
| K (%) | 0.102±0.005a | 0.087±0.008a | 0.185±0.018d | 0.151±0.007bc | 0.170±0.011cd | 0.140±0.003b | 0.163±0.006c | 0.260±0.009e |
| Ca (%) | 1.39±0.08ab | 1.32±0.001a | 1.42±0.03ab | 1.51±0.40ab | 1.35±0.08ab | 1.47±0.03ab | 1.76±0.06b | 1.37±0.01ab |
| Mg (%) | 0.209±0.013b | 0.173±0.002ab | 0.140±0.008ab | 0.160±0.069ab | 0.141±0.003ab | 0.116±0.002a | 0.182±0.012ab | 0.163±0.002ab |
| Fe (ppm) | 166.6±26.8a | 343.8±22.9a | 659.1±486.7a | 818.5±195.3a | 385.9±162.1a | 573.6±17.3a | 728.7±238.7a | 1703.9±391.9b |
| Mn (ppm) | 88.8±2.5a | 109.6±2.0a | 832.1±89.6b | 1025.2±417.2b | 1040.5±82.8b | 1172.3±16.5b | 1493.3±73.9c | 2140.7±63.7d |
| Zn (ppm) | 46.08±3.42b | 160.00±6.06d | 39.44±4.23b | 40.83±8.25b | 29.17±1.44a | 41.17±2.38b | 64.33±2.52c | 67.19±3.76c |
Abbreviations: Feb, February; n.d., not determined because of lack of material.
The different letters in a given line denote significant differences (P<0.05) between values as determined by ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls multiple range test.
Figure 1Assignment of spectra to taxonomic groups of organisms at different sampling times and sites. Relative abundances were calculated from the sum of NSAFs found for each group at the respective sampling sites and time. (a) General taxonomy, (b) Bacterial phyla, (c) Proteobacteria, (d) Fungal phyla, (e) Fungal classes. Groups are only presented if their relative abundance is >0.5% in the respective sample. Sampling sites are presented according to increasing mean air-temperature (from left to right).
Figure 2Comparison of community structure based on NSAF and PLFA analyses. The upper part of the figure shows community structure based on NSAF. Data represent the mean of two biological replicates. The lower part of the figure depicts community structure based on PLFA analysis. Data represent the mean±SD of three biological replicates.
Figure 3Relative abundance of hydrolytic enzymes at different sampling times and sites. (a) Abundance of different enzymatic classes at different sampling times. Data represent mean±SD of eight samples collected at the respective sampling time. No significant differences among sites were detected by t-test analysis. (b) Abundance of different enzymatic classes at different sampling sites. Data represent mean±SD of four samples collected at the respective sampling site. *Represent significant differences, P<0.05, ANOVA followed by LSD-test.
Figure 4Comparison of cellulase and xylanase abundance and total cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities. The upper part of the figure shows enzyme abundances based on NSAFs. Data represent the mean of two biological replicates. The lower part of the figure shows enzyme activities based on photometric assays. Data represent the mean±SD of three biological replicates.
Figure 5Phylogenetic origin of spectra assigned to fungal cellulases at different sampling times and sites compared with the overall distribution of fungal classes. Data represent the average of two biological replicates.
Figure 6PCA biplots of community structure and function obtained in the metaproteomics approach as well as enviromental data and leaf-litter nutrient content. (a) General taxonomy–community structure, (b) community function. Data points are from different sampling times (February—squares and May—diamonds) and four sampling sites. Stars indicate transformations of the variables to meet the assumption of normal distribution, P is log 10 transformed and Ca is (1/(1+log10(Ca)) transformed.; T, mean air-temperature; *indicates inversion of the vector orientation because of data transformation.