Literature DB >> 25834104

EEG artifact removal-state-of-the-art and guidelines.

Jose Antonio Urigüen1, Begoña Garcia-Zapirain.   

Abstract

This paper presents an extensive review on the artifact removal algorithms used to remove the main sources of interference encountered in the electroencephalogram (EEG), specifically ocular, muscular and cardiac artifacts. We first introduce background knowledge on the characteristics of EEG activity, of the artifacts and of the EEG measurement model. Then, we present algorithms commonly employed in the literature and describe their key features. Lastly, principally on the basis of the results provided by various researchers, but also supported by our own experience, we compare the state-of-the-art methods in terms of reported performance, and provide guidelines on how to choose a suitable artifact removal algorithm for a given scenario. With this review we have concluded that, without prior knowledge of the recorded EEG signal or the contaminants, the safest approach is to correct the measured EEG using independent component analysis-to be precise, an algorithm based on second-order statistics such as second-order blind identification (SOBI). Other effective alternatives include extended information maximization (InfoMax) and an adaptive mixture of independent component analyzers (AMICA), based on higher order statistics. All of these algorithms have proved particularly effective with simulations and, more importantly, with data collected in controlled recording conditions. Moreover, whenever prior knowledge is available, then a constrained form of the chosen method should be used in order to incorporate such additional information. Finally, since which algorithm is the best performing is highly dependent on the type of the EEG signal, the artifacts and the signal to contaminant ratio, we believe that the optimal method for removing artifacts from the EEG consists in combining more than one algorithm to correct the signal using multiple processing stages, even though this is an option largely unexplored by researchers in the area.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25834104     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/3/031001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  104 in total

1.  Heading for new shores! Overcoming pitfalls in BCI design.

Authors:  Ricardo Chavarriaga; Melanie Fried-Oken; Sonja Kleih; Fabien Lotte; Reinhold Scherer
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2016-12-30

2.  Quantitative EEG predicts outcomes in children after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Seungha Lee; Xuelong Zhao; Kathryn A Davis; Alexis A Topjian; Brian Litt; Nicholas S Abend
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Direction and viewing area-sensitive influence of EOG artifacts revealed in the EEG topographic pattern analysis.

Authors:  Guangyi Ai; Naoyuki Sato; Balbir Singh; Hiroaki Wagatsuma
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Ultrasound-Guided Second Trimester Fetal Electroencephalography in Two Pregnant Volunteers: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Muhammad Shah Miran; Shijing Li; Meijing Jiang
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Neurol       Date:  2016-06

5.  Breathing above the brain stem: volitional control and attentional modulation in humans.

Authors:  Jose L Herrero; Simon Khuvis; Erin Yeagle; Moran Cerf; Ashesh D Mehta
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Variation in the speech signal as a window into the cognitive architecture of language production.

Authors:  Audrey Bürki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

7.  ARTIST: A fully automated artifact rejection algorithm for single-pulse TMS-EEG data.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Corey J Keller; Nigel C Rogasch; Parker Longwell; Emmanuel Shpigel; Camarin E Rolle; Amit Etkin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Functional connectivity patterns of normal human swallowing: difference among various viscosity swallows in normal and chin-tuck head positions.

Authors:  Iva Jestrović; James L Coyle; Subashan Perera; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.

Authors:  Alison Harris; John A Clithero; Cendri A Hutcherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  A-Situ: a computational framework for affective labeling from psychological behaviors in real-life situations.

Authors:  Byung Hyung Kim; Sungho Jo; Sunghee Choi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.