Literature DB >> 25831525

TCR contact residue hydrophobicity is a hallmark of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes.

Diego Chowell1, Sri Krishna2, Pablo D Becker3, Clément Cocita3, Jack Shu4, Xuefang Tan4, Philip D Greenberg4, Linda S Klavinskis5, Joseph N Blattman6, Karen S Anderson7.   

Abstract

Despite the availability of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-binding peptide prediction algorithms, the development of T-cell vaccines against pathogen and tumor antigens remains challenged by inefficient identification of immunogenic epitopes. CD8(+) T cells must distinguish immunogenic epitopes from nonimmunogenic self peptides to respond effectively against an antigen without endangering the viability of the host. Because this discrimination is fundamental to our understanding of immune recognition and critical for rational vaccine design, we interrogated the biochemical properties of 9,888 MHC class I peptides. We identified a strong bias toward hydrophobic amino acids at T-cell receptor contact residues within immunogenic epitopes of MHC allomorphs, which permitted us to develop and train a hydrophobicity-based artificial neural network (ANN-Hydro) to predict immunogenic epitopes. The immunogenicity model was validated in a blinded in vivo overlapping epitope discovery study of 364 peptides from three HIV-1 Gag protein variants. Applying the ANN-Hydro model on existing peptide-MHC algorithms consistently reduced the number of candidate peptides across multiple antigens and may provide a correlate with immunodominance. Hydrophobicity of TCR contact residues is a hallmark of immunogenic epitopes and marks a step toward eliminating the need for empirical epitope testing for vaccine development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MHC class I; T cell; epitope prediction; immunogenicity; nonself; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25831525      PMCID: PMC4394253          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1500973112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  40 in total

Review 1.  SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs.

Authors:  H Rammensee; J Bachmann; N P Emmerich; O A Bachor; S Stevanović
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  Decoding the patterns of self and nonself by the innate immune system.

Authors:  Ruslan Medzhitov; Charles A Janeway
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  T cell receptor-MHC interactions up close.

Authors:  J Hennecke; D C Wiley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Seong; Polly Matzinger
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 53.106

5.  Discriminating self from nonself with short peptides from large proteomes.

Authors:  Nigel J Burroughs; Rob J de Boer; Can Keşmir
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 2.846

6.  Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules.

Authors:  K Falk; O Rötzschke; S Stevanović; G Jung; H G Rammensee
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution.

Authors:  R Grantham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The characterization of amino acid sequences in proteins by statistical methods.

Authors:  J M Zimmerman; N Eliezer; R Simha
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.691

9.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein.

Authors:  J Kyte; R F Doolittle
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-05-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection.

Authors:  K A Hogquist; S C Jameson; W R Heath; J L Howard; M J Bevan; F R Carbone
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-01-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  78 in total

1.  A generalized framework for computational design and mutational scanning of T-cell receptor binding interfaces.

Authors:  Timothy P Riley; Cory M Ayres; Lance M Hellman; Nishant K Singh; Michael Cosiano; Jennifer M Cimons; Michael J Anderson; Kurt H Piepenbrink; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.650

2.  Genome-wide identification of novel vaccine candidates for Plasmodium falciparum malaria using integrative bioinformatics approaches.

Authors:  Satarudra Prakash Singh; Deeksha Srivastava; Bhartendu Nath Mishra
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.

Authors:  Shutao Mei; Fuyi Li; André Leier; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; Kailin Giam; Nathan P Croft; Tatsuya Akutsu; A Ian Smith; Jian Li; Jamie Rossjohn; Anthony W Purcell; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  In silico and cell-based analyses reveal strong divergence between prediction and observation of T-cell-recognized tumor antigen T-cell epitopes.

Authors:  Julien Schmidt; Philippe Guillaume; Danijel Dojcinovic; Julia Karbach; George Coukos; Immanuel Luescher
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  High-Throughput Stability Screening of Neoantigen/HLA Complexes Improves Immunogenicity Predictions.

Authors:  Dylan T Blaha; Scott D Anderson; Daniel M Yoakum; Marlies V Hager; Yuanyuan Zha; Thomas F Gajewski; David M Kranz
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 11.151

6.  Modeling Sequence-Dependent Peptide Fluctuations in Immunologic Recognition.

Authors:  Cory M Ayres; Timothy P Riley; Steven A Corcelli; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Bayesian multiple instance regression for modeling immunogenic neoantigens.

Authors:  Seongoh Park; Xinlei Wang; Johan Lim; Guanghua Xiao; Tianshi Lu; Tao Wang
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Patient HLA class I genotype influences cancer response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy.

Authors:  Diego Chowell; Luc G T Morris; Claud M Grigg; Jeffrey K Weber; Robert M Samstein; Vladimir Makarov; Fengshen Kuo; Sviatoslav M Kendall; David Requena; Nadeem Riaz; Benjamin Greenbaum; James Carroll; Edward Garon; David M Hyman; Ahmet Zehir; David Solit; Michael Berger; Ruhong Zhou; Naiyer A Rizvi; Timothy A Chan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Tumor neoantigens: building a framework for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew M Gubin; Maxim N Artyomov; Elaine R Mardis; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  An overview of immunoinformatics approaches and databases linking T cell receptor repertoires to their antigen specificity.

Authors:  Ivan V Zvyagin; Vasily O Tsvetkov; Dmitry M Chudakov; Mikhail Shugay
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 2.846

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.