Literature DB >> 31204427

A comprehensive review and performance evaluation of bioinformatics tools for HLA class I peptide-binding prediction.

Shutao Mei1, Fuyi Li1, André Leier2, Tatiana T Marquez-Lago2, Kailin Giam3, Nathan P Croft1, Tatsuya Akutsu4, A Ian Smith1,5, Jian Li6, Jamie Rossjohn1,5, Anthony W Purcell1, Jiangning Song1,5,7.   

Abstract

Human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) molecules are encoded by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I loci in humans. The binding and interaction between HLA-I molecules and intracellular peptides derived from a variety of proteolytic mechanisms play a crucial role in subsequent T-cell recognition of target cells and the specificity of the immune response. In this context, tools that predict the likelihood for a peptide to bind to specific HLA class I allotypes are important for selecting the most promising antigenic targets for immunotherapy. In this article, we comprehensively review a variety of currently available tools for predicting the binding of peptides to a selection of HLA-I allomorphs. Specifically, we compare their calculation methods for the prediction score, employed algorithms, evaluation strategies and software functionalities. In addition, we have evaluated the prediction performance of the reviewed tools based on an independent validation data set, containing 21 101 experimentally verified ligands across 19 HLA-I allotypes. The benchmarking results show that MixMHCpred 2.0.1 achieves the best performance for predicting peptides binding to most of the HLA-I allomorphs studied, while NetMHCpan 4.0 and NetMHCcons 1.1 outperform the other machine learning-based and consensus-based tools, respectively. Importantly, it should be noted that a peptide predicted with a higher binding score for a specific HLA allotype does not necessarily imply it will be immunogenic. That said, peptide-binding predictors are still very useful in that they can help to significantly reduce the large number of epitope candidates that need to be experimentally verified. Several other factors, including susceptibility to proteasome cleavage, peptide transport into the endoplasmic reticulum and T-cell receptor repertoire, also contribute to the immunogenicity of peptide antigens, and some of them can be considered by some predictors. Therefore, integrating features derived from these additional factors together with HLA-binding properties by using machine-learning algorithms may increase the prediction accuracy of immunogenic peptides. As such, we anticipate that this review and benchmarking survey will assist researchers in selecting appropriate prediction tools that best suit their purposes and provide useful guidelines for the development of improved antigen predictors in the future.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HLA; bioinformatics; machine learning; peptide binding; performance benchmarking; prediction model; sequence analysis; web server

Year:  2020        PMID: 31204427      PMCID: PMC7373177          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  103 in total

1.  Predicting sequences and structures of MHC-binding peptides: a computational combinatorial approach.

Authors:  J Zen; H R Treutlein; G B Rudy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides using profile motifs.

Authors:  Pedro A Reche; John-Paul Glutting; Ellis L Reinherz
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.850

3.  Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks.

Authors:  S Henikoff; J G Henikoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  EPIMHC: a curated database of MHC-binding peptides for customized computational vaccinology.

Authors:  Pedro A Reche; Hong Zhang; John-Paul Glutting; Ellis L Reinherz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Learning MHC I--peptide binding.

Authors:  Nebojsa Jojic; Manuel Reyes-Gomez; David Heckerman; Carl Kadie; Ora Schueler-Furman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Twenty years of bioinformatics research for protease-specific substrate and cleavage site prediction: a comprehensive revisit and benchmarking of existing methods.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Yanan Wang; Chen Li; Tatiana T Marquez-Lago; André Leier; Neil D Rawlings; Gholamreza Haffari; Jerico Revote; Tatsuya Akutsu; Kuo-Chen Chou; Anthony W Purcell; Robert N Pike; Geoffrey I Webb; A Ian Smith; Trevor Lithgow; Roger J Daly; James C Whisstock; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Combined Analysis of Antigen Presentation and T-cell Recognition Reveals Restricted Immune Responses in Melanoma.

Authors:  Jennifer A Wargo; Nir Friedman; Arie Admon; Shelly Kalaora; Yochai Wolf; Tali Feferman; Eilon Barnea; Erez Greenstein; Dan Reshef; Itay Tirosh; Alexandre Reuben; Sushant Patkar; Ronen Levy; Juliane Quinkhardt; Tana Omokoko; Nouar Qutob; Ofra Golani; Jianhua Zhang; Xizeng Mao; Xingzhi Song; Chantale Bernatchez; Cara Haymaker; Marie-Andrée Forget; Caitlin Creasy; Polina Greenberg; Brett W Carter; Zachary A Cooper; Steven A Rosenberg; Michal Lotem; Ugur Sahin; Guy Shakhar; Eytan Ruppin; Yardena Samuels
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  GibbsCluster: unsupervised clustering and alignment of peptide sequences.

Authors:  Massimo Andreatta; Bruno Alvarez; Morten Nielsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Derivation of an amino acid similarity matrix for peptide: MHC binding and its application as a Bayesian prior.

Authors:  Yohan Kim; John Sidney; Clemencia Pinilla; Alessandro Sette; Bjoern Peters
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  MHCBN 4.0: A database of MHC/TAP binding peptides and T-cell epitopes.

Authors:  Sneh Lata; Manoj Bhasin; Gajendra P S Raghava
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-04-20
View more
  28 in total

1.  Computational prediction and interpretation of both general and specific types of promoters in Escherichia coli by exploiting a stacked ensemble-learning framework.

Authors:  Fuyi Li; Jinxiang Chen; Zongyuan Ge; Ya Wen; Yanwei Yue; Morihiro Hayashida; Abdelkader Baggag; Halima Bensmail; Jiangning Song
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Promoting the formation of Pi-stacking interaction to improve CTL cells activation between modified peptide and HLA.

Authors:  Ying Zhu; Chang-Xin Huang; Le Zhang; Ze-Fang Wang; Dong-Li Zhao; Fei Ding; Si-Yu Zhang; Yong-Qiang Li; Ling-Zhi Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  The Use of Molecular Dynamics Simulation Method to Quantitatively Evaluate the Affinity between HBV Antigen T Cell Epitope Peptides and HLA-A Molecules.

Authors:  Xueyin Mei; Xingyu Li; Chen Zhao; Anna Liu; Yan Ding; Chuanlai Shen; Jian Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 4.  Recent progress on MHC-I epitope prediction in tumor immunotherapy.

Authors:  Xiangyi Wang; Zhaojin Yu; Wensi Liu; Haichao Tang; Dongxu Yi; Minjie Wei
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

5.  HLA Class I Binding of Mutant EGFR Peptides in NSCLC Is Associated With Improved Survival.

Authors:  Anastasios Dimou; Paul Grewe; John Sidney; Alessandro Sette; Paul J Norman; Robert C Doebele
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  DeepImmuno: deep learning-empowered prediction and generation of immunogenic peptides for T-cell immunity.

Authors:  Guangyuan Li; Balaji Iyer; V B Surya Prasath; Yizhao Ni; Nathan Salomonis
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 7.  Identification of neoantigens for individualized therapeutic cancer vaccines.

Authors:  Franziska Lang; Barbara Schrörs; Martin Löwer; Özlem Türeci; Ugur Sahin
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 112.288

8.  USMPep: universal sequence models for major histocompatibility complex binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Johanna Vielhaben; Markus Wenzel; Wojciech Samek; Nils Strodthoff
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A seven-gene signature model predicts overall survival in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ling Chen; Zijin Xiang; Xueru Chen; Xiuting Zhu; Xiangdong Peng
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 10.  Personalized neoantigen vaccination with synthetic long peptides: recent advances and future perspectives.

Authors:  Xiaotong Chen; Ju Yang; Lifeng Wang; Baorui Liu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.