Literature DB >> 21800231

Matched-pair comparison of radioembolization plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone for chemotherapy refractory liver-dominant colorectal metastases.

Ricarda Seidensticker1, Timm Denecke, Patrick Kraus, Max Seidensticker, Konrad Mohnike, Jörg Fahlke, Erika Kettner, Bert Hildebrandt, Oliver Dudeck, Maciej Pech, Holger Amthauer, Jens Ricke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate overall survival after radioembolization or best supportive care (BSC) in patients with chemotherapy-refractory liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
METHODS: This was a matched-pair comparison of patients who received radioembolization plus BSC or BSC alone for extensive liver disease. Twenty-nine patients who received radioembolization were retrospectively matched with a contemporary cohort of >500 patients who received BSC from 3 centers in Germany. Using clinical databases, patients were initially matched for prior treatments and tumor burden and then 29 patients were consecutively identified with two or more of four matching criteria: synchronous/metachronous metastases, tumor burden, increased ALP, and/or CEA >200 U/ml. Survival was calculated from date of progression before radioembolization or BSC by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: Of 29 patients in each study arm, 16 pairs (55.2%) matched for all four criteria, and 11 pairs (37.9%) matched three criteria. Patients in both groups had a similar performance status (Karnofsky index, median 80% [range, 60-100%]). Compared with BSC alone, radioembolization prolonged survival (median, 8.3 vs. 3.5 months; P < 0.001) with a hazard ratio of 0.3 (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.55; P < 0.001) in a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Treatment-related adverse events following radioembolization included: grade 1-2 fatigue (n = 20, 69%), grade 1 abdominal pain/nausea (n = 14, 48.3%), and grade 2 gastrointestinal ulceration (n = 3, 10.3%). Three cases of grade 3 radiation-induced liver disease were symptomatically managed.
CONCLUSIONS: Radioembolization offers a promising addition to BSC in treatment-refractory patients for whom there are limited options. Survival was prolonged and adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate in nature and manageable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21800231     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0234-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  47 in total

1.  Radioembolization as a Salvage Therapy for Heavily Pretreated Patients With Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors That Affect Outcomes.

Authors:  Constantinos T Sofocleous; Elena G Violari; Vlasios S Sotirchos; Waleed Shady; Mithat Gonen; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Elena N Petre; Lynn A Brody; William Alago; Richard K Do; Michael I D'Angelica; Joseph R Osborne; Neil H Segal; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Nancy E Kemeny
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Multicenter evaluation of the safety and efficacy of radioembolization in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases selected as candidates for (90)Y resin microspheres.

Authors:  Andrew S Kennedy; David Ball; Steven J Cohen; Michael Cohn; Douglas M Coldwell; Alain Drooz; Eduardo Ehrenwald; Samir Kanani; Steven C Rose; Charles W Nutting; Fred M Moeslein; Michael A Savin; Sabine Schirm; Samuel G Putnam; Navesh K Sharma; Eric A Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

3.  Current strategies in interventional oncology of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Tatjana Gruber-Rouh; Christian Marko; Axel Thalhammer; Nour-Eldin Nour-Eldin; Marcel Langenbach; Martin Beeres; Nagy N Naguib; Stephan Zangos; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Radioembolization of hepatic tumors.

Authors:  Andrew Kennedy
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06

Review 5.  Transarterial approaches to primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Authors:  Ali Habib; Kush Desai; Ryan Hickey; Bartley Thornburg; Robert Lewandowski; Riad Salem
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  [Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) of liver tumors].

Authors:  H Duan; M Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  Non-operative therapies for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  John L Nosher; Inaya Ahmed; Akshar N Patel; Vyacheslav Gendel; Philip G Murillo; Rebecca Moss; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

8.  Development of a research agenda for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: proceedings from a multidisciplinary research consensus panel.

Authors:  Bertrand Janne d'Othée; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Nader Hanna; Robert J Lewandowski; Michael C Soulen; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Steven J Cohen; Alan P Venook; Matthew S Johnson; Andrew S Kennedy; Ravi Murthy; Jean-Francois Geschwind; Stephen T Kee
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 9.  Current role of transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lourens Bester; Baerbel Meteling; David Boshell; Akshat Saxena; David L Morris
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20

10.  Perfusion CT best predicts outcome after radioembolization of liver metastases: a comparison of radionuclide and CT imaging techniques.

Authors:  Fabian Morsbach; Bert-Ram Sah; Lea Spring; Gilbert Puippe; Sonja Gordic; Burkhardt Seifert; Niklaus Schaefer; Thomas Pfammatter; Hatem Alkadhi; Caecilia S Reiner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.