Literature DB >> 25828262

Intersectoral collaboration for physical activity in Korean Healthy Cities.

Eunjeong Kang1.   

Abstract

Intersectoral collaboration (ISC) is important in the health field because the complexity of determinants of health makes it difficult for one institution to resolve all health issues. Promotion of physical activity can especially benefit from a multi-sectoral approach. Despite so much emphasis on its importance in both primary health and health promotion, ISC has been underachieved in the field. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and level of ISC among physical activity programs in Healthy Cities as compared to non-Healthy Cities. I conducted a postal survey where 24 people from Healthy Cities and 72 people from non-Healthy Cities participated. The survey included questions to measure the level of ISC as well as to determine ISC partners and activities. Among the entire 393 physical activity programs, 336 (85.5%) had some kind of collaboration with one or more partners. The percentage having one or more partners was greater in Healthy Cities than in non-Healthy Cities. However, there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the level of ISC within a municipal organization. Collaboration activities of the other departments were mostly supportive, such as providing a venue, recruiting participants and publicizing, and other kinds of administrative support. To strengthen ISC in Korean Healthy Cities, various actions including providing a legal basis, specific and substantive supports, financial incentives, and organizational recognitions will be helpful as well as the development of partnerships with other departments in urban planning, transport, urban design, and communication.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collaboration; evaluation; healthy cities network; intersectoral partnerships

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25828262     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dav020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  6 in total

1.  Community maturity to implement Health in All Policies.

Authors:  Jonas Bech Andersen; Gabriel Gulis
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Learning from intersectoral action beyond health: a meta-narrative review.

Authors:  Shinjini Mondal; Sara Van Belle; Antonia Maioni
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  Analysis of Cameroon's Sectoral Policies on Physical Activity for Noncommunicable Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Lambed Tatah; Clarisse Mapa-Tassou; Maylene Shung-King; Tolu Oni; James Woodcock; Amy Weimann; Nicole McCreedy; Trish Muzenda; Ishtar Govia; Jean Claude Mbanya; Felix Assah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Multisectoral action for health in low-income and middle-income settings: how can insights from social science theories inform intragovernmental coordination efforts?

Authors:  Aloysius Ssennyonjo; Sara Van Belle; Kristof Titeca; Bart Criel; Freddie Ssengooba
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2021-05

5.  Engaging Diverse Community Groups to Promote Population Health through Healthy City Approach: Analysis of Successful Cases in Western Pacific Region.

Authors:  Albert Lee; Keiko Nakamura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Basic Criteria, Models, and Indicators of Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Amir Esmaili; Behzad Damari; Ahmad Hajebi; Noora Rafiee; Reza Goudarzi; Abbas Haghshenas
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.429

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.