| Literature DB >> 25826456 |
Jacob J D Egge1, Taylor J Hagbo1.
Abstract
The Mississippi Embayment is a prominent physiographic feature of eastern North America consisting of primarily lowland aquatic habitats and a fish fauna that is largely distinct from nearby highland regions. Numerous studies have demonstrated that both pre-Pleistocene and Pleistocene events have had a strong influence on the distributions and relationships of highland fishes in eastern North America. However, the extent to which these same events affected Embayment distributed taxa remains largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative roles of pre-Pleistocene and Pleistocene events in shaping phylogeographic relationships of four stream dwelling fishes in the Mississippi Embayment. Molecular genetic analyses of the mitochondrial gene cytochrome b were performed for three ictalurid catfish species (Noturus miurus, n = 67; Noturus hildebrandi, n = 93, and Noturus phaeus, n = 44) and one minnow species (Cyprinella camura, n = 78), all distributed in tributary streams of the Mississippi Embayment. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times among haplotypes for each species were estimated using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Phylogenetic analyses recovered 6 major haplotype clades within N. miurus, 5 within N. hildbrandi, 8 within N. phaeus, and 8 within C. camura. All three Noturus species show a high degree of isolation by drainage, which is less evident in C. camura. A clade of haplotypes from tributaries in the southern portion of the Mississippi Embayment was consistently recovered in all four species. Divergence times among clades spanned the Pleistocene, Pliocene, and Miocene. Novel relationships presented here for C. camura and N. phaeus suggest the potential for cryptic species. Pre-Pleistocene and Pleistocene era sea level fluctuations coincide with some divergence events, but no single event explains any common divergence across all taxa. Like their highland relatives, a combination of both pre-Pleistocene and Pleistocene era events have driven divergences among Embayment lineages.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25826456 PMCID: PMC4380359 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116719
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Maps of the Mississippi Embayment region.
A. Map of the eastern U.S. illustrating the location of the Mississippi Embayment relative to the Appalachian, Ozark, and Ouachita Highlands. Dashed line represents approximate extent of the Coastal Plain. Black rectangle inset indicates outline of area highlighted in section B. Data available from the U.S. Geological Survey. B. Map of major river drainages in the Mississippi Embayment region. Abbreviations as follows: AM, Amite River; AR, Arkansas River; BB, Big Black River; BP, Bayou Pierre; BR, Buffalo River, BS, Big Sandy River; CC, Coles Creek; CR, Coldwater River; CU, Cumberland River; FD, Forked Deer River; HR, Homochitto River; HT, Hatchie River; LI, Little River; LR, Loosahatchie River; MO, Missouri River; MR, Mississippi River; OB, Obion River; OR, Ohio River; OU, Ouachita River; PR, Pearl River; LT, Little Tallahatchie; RR, Red River; TR, Tennessee River; WR, Wolf River; WT, West Fork Thompson Creek; YA, Yalobusha River; YZ, Yazoo River; YO, Yocona River. Colored regions correspond with color coding used to designate clades in Figs 3–5.
Fig 3Haplotype networks (at left for each species) and Bayesian consensus topologies (at right for each species) based on cytochrome b sequence data.
A. Noturus miurus. B. Noturus hildebrandi. C. Noturus phaeus. D. Cyprinella camura. Parenthetical numbers indicated haplotypes separated by ≥10 mutational steps. Nodes on trees with posterior probabilities ≥0.95 are indicated with an *. Numbers above nodes indicate likelihood bootstrap support. Locality abbreviations and colors correspond with Fig 1B. Outgroups have been removed from phylogenies for clarity.
Fig 5Chronogram for Cyprinella camura estimated from the combined BEAST analyses based on cytochrome b sequence data.
Outgroup (C. rutila) not shown. Dark bars on nodes represent the 95% highest posterior density of node ages. Colors correspond with those in Fig 1B. Outgroups removed for clarity.
Fig 2Distribution maps showing sampling localities for each species.
A. Noturus miurus. B. Noturus hildebrandi. C. Noturus phaeus. D. Cyprinella camura. Gray shading indicates the natural range of each species. Circles indicate approximate sampling localities for specimens acquired for this study (•) and those used in previous studies with sequences acquired from GenBank (◯).
Sample size (n), number of haplotypes, number of polymorphic sites, and average within-clade sequence divergence for all major clades recovered in the phylogenetic analyses.
| Species | Clade |
| Number of haplotypes | Number of polymorphic sites | Average within-clade sequence divergence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| MI | 34 | 22 | 33 | 0.0051 | |
| MII | 9 | 5 | 5 | 0.0014 | |
| MIII | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0.0051 | |
| MIV | 6 | 5 | 20 | 0.0069 | |
| MV | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0.0016 | |
| MVI | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 | |
|
| |||||
| HI | 21 | 4 | 2 | 0.0015 | |
| HII | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0.0012 | |
| HIII | 10 | 2 | 1 | 0.0003 | |
| HIV | 20 | 8 | 8 | 0.0022 | |
| HV | 22 | 5 | 15 | 0.0023 | |
|
| |||||
| PI | 4 | 2 | 18 | 0.0064 | |
| PII | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0.0009 | |
| PIII | 10 | 4 | 4 | 0.0035 | |
| PIV | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0.0006 | |
| PV | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 | |
| PVI | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0.0025 | |
| PVII | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0.0000 | |
| PVIII | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0.0000 | |
|
| |||||
| CI | 5 | 4 | 4 | 0.0020 | |
| CII | 14 | 4 | 3 | 0.0005 | |
| CIII | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0.0010 | |
| CIV | 17 | 6 | 6 | 0.0016 | |
| CV | 5 | 4 | 5 | 0.0015 | |
| CVI | 4 | 1 | 8 | 0.0000 | |
| CVII | 17 | 8 | 17 | 0.0022 | |
| CVIII | 11 | 8 | 12 | 0.0035 | |
Clade names correspond with those presented in Figs 3–5.
Average between-clade sequence divergence between major clades recovered in the phylogenetic analyses for each species.
| Taxon | Clade/taxon | Average between-clade sequence divergence |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| MI vs. MII | 0.0274 | |
| MIII vs. MIV | 0.0182 | |
| MV vs. M(III+IV) | 0.0280 | |
| M(I+II) vs. M(III+IV+V) | 0.0217 | |
| MVI vs. M(I+II+III+IV+V) | 0.0530 | |
|
| ||
| HII vs. HIII | 0.0139 | |
| HI vs. H(II+III) | 0.0120 | |
| HIV vs. H(I+II+III) | 0.0429 | |
|
| 0.0491 | |
| HV vs. | 0.0517 | |
|
| ||
| PI vs. PII | 0.0368 | |
| PIII vs. PIV | 0.0193 | |
| PV vs. PVI | 0.0066 | |
| P(III+IV) vs. P(V+VI) | 0.0128 | |
| PVII vs. P(III+IV+V+VI) | 0.0133 | |
| PVIII vs. P(III+IV+V+VI+VII) | 0.0154 | |
| P(I+II) vs. P(III+IV+V+VI+VII+VIII) | 0.0622 | |
|
| ||
| CI vs. CII | 0.0094 | |
| CIII vs. CIV | 0.0063 | |
| CV vs. CVI | 0.0050 | |
| C(I+II) vs. C(III+IV) | 0.0069 | |
| CVII vs. C(V+VI) | 0.0056 | |
| C(I+II+III+IV) vs. C(V+VI+VII) | 0.0098 | |
|
| 0.0099 | |
| CVIII vs. | 0.0479 | |
Clade names correspond with those presented in Figs 3–5.
Best-fit models for cyt b data partitions as determined by PartitionFinder analyses using the BIC optimality criterion.
| Dataset | Partition | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unlimited analysis | MrBayes models only analysis | ||
|
| |||
| 1st position | TVMef + I + Γ | SYM + I + Γ | |
| 2nd position | TrN + I + Γ | HKY + I + Γ | |
| 3rd position | GTR + I + Γ | GTR + I + Γ | |
| all positions | GTR + I + Γ | GTR + I + Γ | |
|
| |||
| 1st position | TrNef + Γ | K80 + I + Γ | |
| 2nd position | TrN + Γ | GTR + Γ | |
| 3rd position | GTR + I + Γ | GTR + Γ | |
| all positions | GTR + I + Γ | GTR + I + Γ | |
Results of both an unlimited analysis considering all 56 possible models and a restricted search limited only to models that can be implemented in MrBayes are shown.
Fig 4Chronogram for three Noturus species estimated from the combined rate-calibrated BEAST analyses based on cytochrome b sequence data.
Dark bars on nodes represent the 95% highest posterior density of node ages recovered in the rate-calibrated analyses while light bars above nodes represent the same for fossil-calibrated analyses. * indicates the node was not recovered in the fossil-calibrated analyses. Colors correspond with those in Fig 1B. Outgroups removed for clarity.
Estimated divergence times of common clades recovered in multiple taxa from sister clades in both the rate-calibrated and fossil-calibrated BEAST analyses.
| Clade Divergence | Taxon | Mean Age (95% HPD), Ma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate-calibrated | Fossil-calibrated | ||
| Obion + Forked Deer |
| 0.67 (0.30, 1.20) | 1.19 (0.54, 1.83) |
|
| 1.22 (0.55, 2.16) | 2.14 (1.25, 3.19) | |
|
| 8.86 (4.29, 15.42) | 16.24 (9.29, 24.52) | |
| Wolf + Coldwater |
| 2.56 (1.18, 4.56) | 4.40 (2.41, 6.37) |
|
| 3.26 (1.55, 5.58) | 5.51 (3.42, 7.79) | |
|
| 1.85 (0.90, 3.22) | 2.61 (1.57, 3.84) | |
| Hatchie |
| 5.29 (2.80, 9.14) | 9.00 (5.91, 12.47) |
|
| 5.16 (2.85, 8.95) | 8.89 (5.87, 12.02) | |
|
| 1.19 (0.47, 2.21) | 2.10 (0.95, 3.34) | |
| Southern |
| 3.46 (1.83, 5.92) | 4.62 (2.88, 6.58) |
|
| 1.22 (0.55, 2.16) | 2.14 (1.25, 3.19) | |
|
| 1.67 (0.83, 2.92) | 2.61 (1.57, 3.84) | |
|
| 0.67 (0.27, 1.22) | — | |
| Big Black + Bayou Pierre |
| 1.65 (0.77, 2.94) | 2.86 (1.62, 4.20) |
|
| 0.90 (0.38, 1.62) | 1.56 (0.87, 2.40) | |
|
| 1.17 (0.52, 2.11) | 1.99 (1.09, 3.03) | |
|
| 0.38 (0.13, 0.73) | — | |
includes Yocona and Little Tallahatchie haplotypes
includes Yalobusha haplotypes
includes Little haplotypes.