Literature DB >> 15545252

Molecular phylogenetics of squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree.

Ted Townsend1, Allan Larson, Edward Louis, J Robert Macey.   

Abstract

Squamate reptiles (snakes, lizards, and amphisbaenians) serve as model systems for evolutionary studies of a variety of morphological and behavioral traits, and phylogeny is crucial to many generalizations derived from such studies. Specifically, the traditional dichotomy between Iguania (anoles, iguanas, chameleons, etc.) and Scleroglossa (skinks, geckos, snakes, etc.) has been correlated with major evolutionary shifts within Squamata. We present a molecular phylogenetic study of 69 squamate species using approximately 4600 (2876 parsimony-informative) base pairs (bp) of DNA sequence data from the nuclear genes RAG-1(approximately 2750 bp) and c-mos(approximately 360 bp) and the mitochondrial ND2 region (approximately 1500 bp), sampling all major clades and most major subclades. Under our hypothesis, species previously placed in Iguania, Anguimorpha, and almost all recognized squamate families form strongly supported monophyletic groups. However, species previously placed in Scleroglossa, Varanoidea, and several other higher taxa do not form monophyletic groups. Iguania, the traditional sister group of Scleroglossa, is actually highly nested within Scleroglossa. This unconventional rooting does not seem to be due to long-branch attraction, base composition biases among taxa, or convergence caused by similar selective forces acting on nonsister taxa. Studies of functional tongue morphology and feeding mode have contrasted the similar states found in Sphenodon(the nearest outgroup to squamates) and Iguania with those of Scleroglossa, but our findings suggest that similar states in Sphenodonand Iguania result from homoplasy. Snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamid lizards, limbless forms whose phylogenetic positions historically have been impossible to place with confidence, are not grouped together and appear to have evolved this condition independently. Amphisbaenians are the sister group of lacertids, and dibamid lizards diverged early in squamate evolutionary history. Snakes are grouped with iguanians, lacertiforms, and anguimorphs, but are not nested within anguimorphs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15545252     DOI: 10.1080/10635150490522340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  64 in total

1.  Intercontinental dispersal by a microendemic burrowing reptile (Dibamidae).

Authors:  Ted M Townsend; Dean H Leavitt; Tod W Reeder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  A review of sex determining mechanisms in geckos (Gekkota: Squamata).

Authors:  T Gamble
Journal:  Sex Dev       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 1.824

3.  Does population size affect genetic diversity? A test with sympatric lizard species.

Authors:  M T J Hague; E J Routman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  First description of a fossil chamaeleonid from Greece and its relevance for the European biogeographic history of the group.

Authors:  Georgios L Georgalis; Andrea Villa; Massimo Delfino
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  Tikiguania and the antiquity of squamate reptiles (lizards and snakes).

Authors:  Mark N Hutchinson; Adam Skinner; Michael S Y Lee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Molecular evidence and marine snake origins.

Authors:  Michael S Y Lee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  A juvenile lizard specimen with well-preserved skin impressions from the Upper Jurassic/Lower Cretaceous of Daohugou, Inner Mongolia, China.

Authors:  S E Evans; Y Wang
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2007-01-10

8.  Low rate of interchromosomal rearrangements during old radiation of gekkotan lizards (Squamata: Gekkota).

Authors:  Martina Johnson Pokorná; Vladimir A Trifonov; Willem Rens; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Lukáš Kratochvíl
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Evaluating molecular clock calibrations using Bayesian analyses with soft and hard bounds.

Authors:  Kate L Sanders; Michael S Y Lee
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Development and application of a phylogenomic toolkit: resolving the evolutionary history of Madagascar's lemurs.

Authors:  Julie E Horvath; David W Weisrock; Stephanie L Embry; Isabella Fiorentino; James P Balhoff; Peter Kappeler; Gregory A Wray; Huntington F Willard; Anne D Yoder
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.