Literature DB >> 25826163

The population distribution of the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) and SAD/height ratio among Finnish adults.

H S Kahn1, H Rissanen, K M Bullard, P Knekt.   

Abstract

Sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD; 'abdominal height' measured in supine position) may improve upon conventional anthropometry for predicting incident cardiometabolic diseases. However, the SAD is used infrequently by practitioners and epidemiologists. A representative survey of Finnish adults in 2000-2001 collected body measurements including SAD (by sliding-beam calliper) using standardized protocols. Sampled non-pregnant adults (ages 30+ years; 79% participation) provided 6123 SAD measurements from 80 health centre districts. Through stratified, complex survey design, these data represented 2.86 million adults at ages 30+ years. SAD ranged from 13.5 to 38.0 cm, with a population mean (standard error) of 21.7 (0.05) cm and median (interquartile range) of 21.0 (19.1-23.4). Median SAD was higher at ages 50+ years compared with ages 30-49 both for men (22.4 [20.5-24.6] vs. 20.8 [19.3-22.7]) and women (21.7 [19.6-23.9] vs. 19.4 [17.8-21.4]). The SAD/height ratio was similar (0.118) for both sexes at 30-39 years, rising more steeply with age for women than men. Attaining only a basic education, compared with a high level, was associated with increased mean (95% confidence interval) SADs for men (22.6 [22.3-22.8] vs. 22.0 [21.7-22.2]) and women (21.8 [21.5-22.0] vs. 20.6 [20.4-20.8]). Finland's early experience with nationally representative SAD measurements provides normative reference values and physiological insights useful for investigations of cardiometabolic risk.
© 2014 World Obesity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal height; adiposity; anthropometry; reference values

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25826163      PMCID: PMC4445126          DOI: 10.1111/cob.12078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obes        ISSN: 1758-8103


  43 in total

1.  Correlation of anthropometry with CT in Mexican-American women.

Authors:  C Keller; K Chintapalli; J Lancaster
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Relationship between waist circumference and supine abdominal height measured at different anatomical sites and cardiometabolic risk factors in older women.

Authors:  H A de Almeida Paula; R de Cássia Lanes Ribeiro; L E F P de Lima Rosado; M V Abranches; S do Carmo Castro Franceschini
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.089

3.  Value of the sagittal abdominal diameter in coronary heart disease risk assessment: cohort study in a large, multiethnic population.

Authors:  Carlos Iribarren; Jeanne A Darbinian; Joan C Lo; Bruce H Fireman; Alan S Go
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study.

Authors:  G Tornaghi; R Raiteri; C Pozzato; A Rispoli; M Bramani; M Cipolat; A Craveri
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1994-11

5.  Sagittal abdominal diameter and risk of sudden death in asymptomatic middle-aged men: the Paris Prospective Study I.

Authors:  J P Empana; P Ducimetiere; M A Charles; X Jouven
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Sagittal abdominal diameter as a practical predictor of visceral fat.

Authors:  M Zamboni; E Turcato; F Armellini; H S Kahn; A Zivelonghi; H Santana; I A Bergamo-Andreis; O Bosello
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  1998-07

7.  Lower tocopherol serum levels in subjects with abdominal adiposity.

Authors:  M Ohrvall; S Tengblad; B Vessby
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Sagittal abdominal diameter as a screening tool in clinical research: cutoffs for cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  U Risérus; U de Faire; L Berglund; M-L Hellénius
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2010-03-11

9.  Population distribution of the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) from a representative sample of US adults: comparison of SAD, waist circumference and body mass index for identifying dysglycemia.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Qiuping Gu; Kai McKeever Bullard; David S Freedman; Namanjeet Ahluwalia; Cynthia L Ogden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Structural and functional properties of deep abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue explain its association with insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in men.

Authors:  Kyriakoula Marinou; Leanne Hodson; Senthil K Vasan; Barbara A Fielding; Rajarshi Banerjee; Kerstin Brismar; Michael Koutsilieris; Anne Clark; Matt J Neville; Fredrik Karpe
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of adiposity indicators associated with fasting-state insulinemia, triglyceridemia, and related risk biomarkers in a nationally representative, adult population.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Yiling J Cheng
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 5.602

Review 2.  [Above and beyond BMI : Alternative methods of measuring body fat and muscle mass in critically ill patients and their clinical significance].

Authors:  T Weig; T Irlbeck; L Frey; P Paprottka; M Irlbeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Beyond Body Mass Index: Advantages of Abdominal Measurements for Recognizing Cardiometabolic Disorders.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Kai McKeever Bullard
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Indicators of abdominal size relative to height associated with sex, age, socioeconomic position and ancestry among US adults.

Authors:  Henry S Kahn; Kai McKeever Bullard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sagittal abdominal diameter and its socioeconomic correlates: perspective of sex differences.

Authors:  Chang Li; Marcelline Harris; Dennis Tsilimingras; Sophia Z Liu; Ying Sheng; Xuefeng Liu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Sagittal Abdominal Diameter, Waist Circumference, and BMI as Predictors of Multiple Measures of Glucose Metabolism: An NHANES Investigation of US Adults.

Authors:  Shelby A Firouzi; Larry A Tucker; James D LeCheminant; Bruce W Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.011

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.