Henry S Kahn1, Kai McKeever Bullard2. 1. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. Electronic address: hkahn@cdc.gov. 2. Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical recognition of cardiometabolic disorders might be enhanced by anthropometry based on the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD; also called "abdominal height") or waist circumference rather than on weight. Direct comparisons of body mass index (BMI, weight/height(2)) with SAD/height ratio (SADHtR) or waist circumference/height ratio (WHtR) have not previously been tested in nationally representative populations. METHODS: Nonpregnant adults without diagnosed diabetes (ages 20-64 years; n = 3071) provided conventional anthropometry and supine SAD (by sliding-beam caliper) in the 2011-2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Population-weighted, logistic models estimated how strongly each anthropometric indicator was associated with 5 cardiometabolic disorders: Dysglycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥5.7%), HyperNonHDLc (non-high-density-lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol ≥4.14 mmol/L, or taking anticholesteremic medications), Hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medications), HyperALT (alanine transaminase ≥p75 [75th percentile, sex-specific]), and HyperGGT (gamma-glutamyltransferase ≥p75 [sex-specific]). RESULTS: After scaling each indicator, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) tended to be highest for SADHtR and lowest for BMI when identifying each disorder except dysglycemia. When SADHtR entered models simultaneously with BMI, the aORs for BMI no longer directly identified any condition, whereas SADHtR identified persons with HyperNonHDLc by aOR 2.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-4.51), Hypertension by aOR 2.51 (95% CI, 1.22-5.15), HyperALT by aOR 2.89 (95% CI, 1.56-5.37), and HyperGGT by aOR 5.43 (95% CI, 3.01-9.79). WHtR competed successfully against BMI with regard to Dysglycemia, HyperNonHDLc, and HyperGGT. c-Statistics of SADHtR and WHtR were higher than those of BMI (P <.001) for identifying HyperNonHDLc and HyperGGT. CONCLUSIONS: Among nonelderly adults, SADHtR or WHtR recognized cardiometabolic disorders better than did the BMI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The clinical recognition of cardiometabolic disorders might be enhanced by anthropometry based on the sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD; also called "abdominal height") or waist circumference rather than on weight. Direct comparisons of body mass index (BMI, weight/height(2)) with SAD/height ratio (SADHtR) or waist circumference/height ratio (WHtR) have not previously been tested in nationally representative populations. METHODS: Nonpregnant adults without diagnosed diabetes (ages 20-64 years; n = 3071) provided conventional anthropometry and supine SAD (by sliding-beam caliper) in the 2011-2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Population-weighted, logistic models estimated how strongly each anthropometric indicator was associated with 5 cardiometabolic disorders: Dysglycemia (glycated hemoglobin ≥5.7%), HyperNonHDLc (non-high-density-lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol ≥4.14 mmol/L, or taking anticholesteremic medications), Hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg, or taking antihypertensive medications), HyperALT (alanine transaminase ≥p75 [75th percentile, sex-specific]), and HyperGGT (gamma-glutamyltransferase ≥p75 [sex-specific]). RESULTS: After scaling each indicator, adjusted odds ratios (aORs) tended to be highest for SADHtR and lowest for BMI when identifying each disorder except dysglycemia. When SADHtR entered models simultaneously with BMI, the aORs for BMI no longer directly identified any condition, whereas SADHtR identified persons with HyperNonHDLc by aOR 2.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-4.51), Hypertension by aOR 2.51 (95% CI, 1.22-5.15), HyperALT by aOR 2.89 (95% CI, 1.56-5.37), and HyperGGT by aOR 5.43 (95% CI, 3.01-9.79). WHtR competed successfully against BMI with regard to Dysglycemia, HyperNonHDLc, and HyperGGT. c-Statistics of SADHtR and WHtR were higher than those of BMI (P <.001) for identifying HyperNonHDLc and HyperGGT. CONCLUSIONS: Among nonelderly adults, SADHtR or WHtR recognized cardiometabolic disorders better than did the BMI. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Body mass index; Epidemiologic measurements; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypertension; Sagittal abdominal diameter
Authors: Saverio Stranges; Maurizio Trevisan; Joan M Dorn; Jacek Dmochowski; Richard P Donahue Journal: Hypertension Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Roger K Schindhelm; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Lex M Bouter; Coen D A Stehouwer; Robert J Heine; Michaela Diamant Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2006-05-08 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Ravi V Shah; Venkatesh L Murthy; Siddique A Abbasi; Ron Blankstein; Raymond Y Kwong; Allison B Goldfine; Michael Jerosch-Herold; João A C Lima; Jingzhong Ding; Matthew A Allison Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-11-05
Authors: Alvin Chandra; Ian J Neeland; Jarett D Berry; Colby R Ayers; Anand Rohatgi; Sandeep R Das; Amit Khera; Darren K McGuire; James A de Lemos; Aslan T Turer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Ana Carolina J Vasques; Roberta S L Cassani; Adriana C e Forti; Brunna S Vilela; José Carlos Pareja; Marcos Antonio Tambascia; Bruno Geloneze Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-05-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mingxia Yuan; Fang-Chi Hsu; Donald W Bowden; Jianzhao Xu; S Carrie Smith; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Mary E Comeau; Jasmin Divers; Thomas C Register; J Jeffrey Carr; Carl D Langefeld; Barry I Freedman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Robinson Ramírez-Vélez; Jorge Enrique Correa-Bautista; Katherine González-Ruíz; Alejandra Tordecilla-Sanders; Antonio García-Hermoso; Jacqueline Schmidt-RioValle; Emilio González-Jiménez Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.390