Literature DB >> 25825844

EORTC QLQ-BR23 and FACT-B for the assessment of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a literature review.

Jasmine Nguyen1, Marko Popovic, Edward Chow, David Cella, Jennifer L Beaumont, Dominic Chu, Julia DiGiovanni, Henry Lam, Natalie Pulenzas, Andrew Bottomley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the development, characteristics and validity of two widely used tools in the breast cancer population, the EORTC QLQ-BR23 and the FACT-B.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, OLDMEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify relevant studies.
RESULTS: Both tools were found to be reliable and valid. The QLQ-BR23 focuses on physical function, whereas the FACT-B emphasizes emotional well-being. Scoring, item format, organization and response options differ between questionnaires.
CONCLUSION: Overall, both questionnaires are effective in assessing breast cancer-specific quality of life. Clear similarities and differences between the two tools exist. Decision-making between the questionnaires should be based on the purpose and design of the study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EORTC; FACT; breast cancer; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25825844     DOI: 10.2217/cer.14.76

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Eff Res        ISSN: 2042-6305            Impact factor:   1.744


  22 in total

1.  Prevalence of physical problems detected by the distress thermometer and problem list in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Kelly M Shaffer; Amy Tiersten; Jimmie Holland
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  The mediating effect of pain catastrophizing and perceived injustice in the relationship of pain on health-related quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Laurence Leysen; Wilfried Cools; Jo Nijs; Nele Adriaenssens; Roselien Pas; C Paul van Wilgen; Rinske Bults; Eva Roose; Astrid Lahousse; David Beckwée
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leonardo Z Cordova; David J Hunter-Smith; Warren M Rozen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-08

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcomes in the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Eileen H Shinn; Sophie Gregrowski; Gretchen Kimmick; Laura S Dominici; Elizabeth S Frank; Karen Lisa Smith; Gabrielle Rocque; Kathryn J Ruddy; Teri Pollastro; Michelle Melisko; Tarah J Ballinger; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Health-related Quality of Life in Metastatic and Adjuvant Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  M Wallwiener; E Simoes; A N Sokolov; S Y Brucker; P A Fasching; J Graf
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  The effects of home-based exercise therapy for breast cancer-related fatigue induced by radical radiotherapy.

Authors:  Georgios Mavropalias; Prue Cormie; Carolyn J Peddle-McIntyre; Daniel A Galvão; Dennis R Taaffe; Christelle Schofield; Sharon Ray; Yvonne Zissiadis; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  The reliability and validity of Lymphedema Quality of Life Questionnaire-Arm in Turkish patients with upper limb lymphedema related with breast cancer.

Authors:  Pınar Borman; Ayşegül Yaman; Merve Denizli; Sevilay Karahan; Oya Özdemir
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-09

8.  The quality of life of Croatian women after mastectomy: a cross-sectional single-center study.

Authors:  Stana Pačarić; Jozo Kristek; Jure Mirat; Goran Kondža; Tajana Turk; Nikolina Farčić; Želimir Orkić; Ana Nemčić
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-BR23 scales.

Authors:  Juan Xia; Zheng Tang; Peng Wu; Jiwei Wang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A randomised online experimental study to compare responses to brief and extended surveys of health-related quality of life and psychosocial outcomes among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Kerry Ettridge; Joanna Caruso; David Roder; Ivanka Prichard; Katrine Scharling-Gamba; Kathleen Wright; Caroline Miller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.