Literature DB >> 32990882

A randomised online experimental study to compare responses to brief and extended surveys of health-related quality of life and psychosocial outcomes among women with breast cancer.

Kerry Ettridge1, Joanna Caruso2, David Roder3, Ivanka Prichard4, Katrine Scharling-Gamba2, Kathleen Wright2, Caroline Miller5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Collecting patient-reported outcomes is important in informing the well-being of women with breast cancer. Consumer perceptions are important for successful implementation of monitoring systems, but are rarely formally assessed. We compared reactions to two different surveys (assessing psychosocial outcomes and/or Health-related Quality of Life (HrQoL) outcomes) among Australian women with breast cancer.
METHODS: Women (18 + years) within 5 years diagnosis of breast cancer were randomly allocated to complete one of two online surveys: (i) minimum HrQoL measures or (ii) minimum HrQoL measures plus psychosocial outcomes (body image, depression, anxiety stress, fear of cancer recurrence, decisional difficulties and unmet need). Participants completed questions regarding their perceptions of the survey, including qualitative feedback.
RESULTS: Data were available for 171 participants (n(i) = 89; n(ii) = 82), with 92% (n = 158) providing 95-100% complete data. Perceptions were comparable between survey groups, and high (80-100%) regarding time burden, ease of completion, comprehensible, appropriateness and willingness to participate again and moderately high (67-74%) regarding willingness to answer more questions and relevance. Qualitative feedback indicated gaps across both surveys, including financial/work-related issues, satisfaction with information and care, need for nuanced questions, and impact of side effects/treatment, and from the minimum set only, emotional well-being and support. Impairment in some HrQoL and psychosocial outcomes were observed among participants.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of HrQoL and psychosocial outcomes was well received by consumers. Results alleviate concern regarding possible patient burden imposed by longer more in-depth surveys. The importance placed on assessment brevity should not outweigh the need to assess outcomes that consumers consider important.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Consumer perspectives; Health-related quality of life (HrQoL); Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); Psychosocial

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32990882     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02651-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   3.440


  64 in total

1.  Assessing the relationship between physical fitness activities, cognitive health, and quality of life among older cancer survivors.

Authors:  Tanya R Fitzpatrick; Linda Edgar; Christina Holcroft
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

2.  Emotional support following cancer: a test of the stigma and social activity hypotheses.

Authors:  J R Bloom; L Kessler
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1994-06

3.  Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Melissa Chan; Henna Bhatti; Marie Halton; Luigi Grassi; Christoffer Johansen; Nicholas Meader
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures May Add Value in Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  M Lagendijk; L S E van Egdom; F E E van Veen; E L Vos; M A M Mureau; N van Leeuwen; J A Hazelzet; H F Lingsma; L B Koppert
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) Initiative.

Authors:  Wee Loon Ong; Maartje G Schouwenburg; Annelotte C M van Bommel; Caleb Stowell; Kim H Allison; Karen E Benn; John P Browne; Rodney D Cooter; Geoff P Delaney; Francois P Duhoux; Patricia A Ganz; Patricia Hancock; Reshma Jagsi; Felicia M Knaul; Anne M Knip; Linetta B Koppert; Henry M Kuerer; Sarah McLaughin; Marc A M Mureau; Ann H Partridge; Dereesa Purtell Reid; Lisa Sheeran; Thomas J Smith; Mark J Stoutjesdijk; Marie Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Yvonne Wengström; Cheng-Har Yip; Christobel Saunders
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 31.777

6.  Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study.

Authors:  Caroline Burgess; Victoria Cornelius; Sharon Love; Jill Graham; Michael Richards; Amanda Ramirez
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-04

7.  My changed body: breast cancer, body image, distress and self-compassion.

Authors:  Astrid Przezdziecki; Kerry A Sherman; Andrew Baillie; Alan Taylor; Elizabeth Foley; Kellie Stalgis-Bilinski
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2012-12-02       Impact factor: 3.894

8.  Then and now: quality of life of young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joan R Bloom; Susan L Stewart; Subo Chang; Priscilla J Banks
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Factors Affecting Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: A Descriptive and Cross-sectional Study with Review of Literature.

Authors:  Neelam Sharma; Abhishek Purkayastha
Journal:  J Midlife Health       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

Review 10.  Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-29
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Key considerations to reduce or address respondent burden in patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection.

Authors:  Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi; Jessica Roydhouse; Samantha Cruz Rivera; Paul Kamudoni; Peter Schache; Roger Wilson; Richard Stephens; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.