Literature DB >> 25824945

Differences in genome-wide repeat sequence instability conferred by proofreading and mismatch repair defects.

Scott A Lujan1, Alan B Clark1, Thomas A Kunkel2.   

Abstract

Mutation rates are used to calibrate molecular clocks and to link genetic variants with human disease. However, mutation rates are not uniform across each eukaryotic genome. Rates for insertion/deletion (indel) mutations have been found to vary widely when examined in vitro and at specific loci in vivo. Here, we report the genome-wide rates of formation and repair of indels made during replication of yeast nuclear DNA. Using over 6000 indels accumulated in four mismatch repair (MMR) defective strains, and statistical corrections for false negatives, we find that indel rates increase by 100 000-fold with increasing homonucleotide run length, representing the greatest effect on replication fidelity of any known genomic parameter. Nonetheless, long genomic homopolymer runs are overrepresented relative to random chance, implying positive selection. Proofreading defects in the replicative polymerases selectively increase indel rates in short repetitive tracts, likely reflecting the distance over which Pols δ and ϵ interact with duplex DNA upstream of the polymerase active site. In contrast, MMR defects hugely increase indel mutagenesis in long repetitive sequences. Because repetitive sequences are not uniformly distributed among genomic functional elements, the quantitatively different consequences on genome-wide repeat sequence instability conferred by defects in proofreading and MMR have important biological implications. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824945      PMCID: PMC4417177          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  40 in total

1.  Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Dmitry A Gordenin; Carrie M Stith; Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Mutation hot spots in yeast caused by long-range clustering of homopolymeric sequences.

Authors:  Xin Ma; Maria V Rogacheva; K T Nishant; Sarah Zanders; Carlos D Bustamante; Eric Alani
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Exonucleolytic proofreading during replication of repetitive DNA.

Authors:  L C Kroutil; K Register; K Bebenek; T A Kunkel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-01-23       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Survival of DNA damage in yeast directly depends on increased dNTP levels allowed by relaxed feedback inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase.

Authors:  Andrei Chabes; Bilyana Georgieva; Vladimir Domkin; Xiaolan Zhao; Rodney Rothstein; Lars Thelander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The multiple biological roles of the 3'-->5' exonuclease of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase delta require switching between the polymerase and exonuclease domains.

Authors:  Yong Hwan Jin; Parie Garg; Carrie M W Stith; Hanan Al-Refai; Joan F Sterling; Laura J W Murray; Thomas A Kunkel; Michael A Resnick; Peter M Burgers; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Inefficient proofreading and biased error rates during inaccurate DNA synthesis by a mutant derivative of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase delta.

Authors:  Stephanie A Nick McElhinny; Carrie M Stith; Peter M J Burgers; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A mutation in POLE predisposing to a multi-tumour phenotype.

Authors:  Anna Rohlin; Theofanis Zagoras; Staffan Nilsson; Ulf Lundstam; Jan Wahlström; Leif Hultén; Tommy Martinsson; Göran B Karlsson; Margareta Nordling
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Claire Palles; Jean-Baptiste Cazier; Kimberley M Howarth; Enric Domingo; Angela M Jones; Peter Broderick; Zoe Kemp; Sarah L Spain; Estrella Guarino; Estrella Guarino Almeida; Israel Salguero; Amy Sherborne; Daniel Chubb; Luis G Carvajal-Carmona; Yusanne Ma; Kulvinder Kaur; Sara Dobbins; Ella Barclay; Maggie Gorman; Lynn Martin; Michal B Kovac; Sean Humphray; Anneke Lucassen; Christopher C Holmes; David Bentley; Peter Donnelly; Jenny Taylor; Christos Petridis; Rebecca Roylance; Elinor J Sawyer; David J Kerr; Susan Clark; Jonathan Grimes; Stephen E Kearsey; Huw J W Thomas; Gilean McVean; Richard S Houlston; Ian Tomlinson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Crystal structure of yeast DNA polymerase ε catalytic domain.

Authors:  Rinku Jain; Kanagalaghatta R Rajashankar; Angeliki Buku; Robert E Johnson; Louise Prakash; Satya Prakash; Aneel K Aggarwal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Heterogeneous polymerase fidelity and mismatch repair bias genome variation and composition.

Authors:  Scott A Lujan; Anders R Clausen; Alan B Clark; Heather K MacAlpine; David M MacAlpine; Ewa P Malc; Piotr A Mieczkowski; Adam B Burkholder; David C Fargo; Dmitry A Gordenin; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more
  19 in total

1.  Genome-wide mutagenesis resulting from topoisomerase 1-processing of unrepaired ribonucleotides in DNA.

Authors:  Jessica S Williams; Scott A Lujan; Zhi-Xiong Zhou; Adam B Burkholder; Alan B Clark; David C Fargo; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-07-03

2.  Variable Spontaneous Mutation and Loss of Heterozygosity among Heterozygous Genomes in Yeast.

Authors:  Duong T Nguyen; Baojun Wu; Hongan Long; Nan Zhang; Caitlyn Patterson; Stephen Simpson; Krystalynne Morris; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch; Weilong Hao
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Specificity of the DNA Mismatch Repair System (MMR) and Mutagenesis Bias in Bacteria.

Authors:  Hongan Long; Samuel F Miller; Emily Williams; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  R-loop formation by dCas9 is mutagenic in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marian F Laughery; Hannah C Mayes; Ivan K Pedroza; John J Wyrick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Eukaryotic genome instability in light of asymmetric DNA replication.

Authors:  Scott A Lujan; Jessica S Williams; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2015-12-20       Impact factor: 8.250

6.  Extremely Rare Polymorphisms in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Allow Inference of the Mutational Spectrum.

Authors:  Yuan O Zhu; Gavin Sherlock; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 7.  Stability across the Whole Nuclear Genome in the Presence and Absence of DNA Mismatch Repair.

Authors:  Scott Alexander Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Analysis of somatic microsatellite indels identifies driver events in human tumors.

Authors:  Yosef E Maruvka; Kent W Mouw; Rosa Karlic; Prasanna Parasuraman; Atanas Kamburov; Paz Polak; Nicholas J Haradhvala; Julian M Hess; Esther Rheinbay; Yehuda Brody; Amnon Koren; Lior Z Braunstein; Alan D'Andrea; Michael S Lawrence; Adam Bass; Andre Bernards; Franziska Michor; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 68.164

9.  Genome-wide analysis of the specificity and mechanisms of replication infidelity driven by imbalanced dNTP pools.

Authors:  Danielle L Watt; Robert J Buckland; Scott A Lujan; Thomas A Kunkel; Andrei Chabes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Human mismatch repair system balances mutation rates between strands by removing more mismatches from the lagging strand.

Authors:  Maria A Andrianova; Georgii A Bazykin; Sergey I Nikolaev; Vladimir B Seplyarskiy
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.