Literature DB >> 25824699

The five steps of comprehensive psychosocial distress screening.

Mark Lazenby1, Hui Tan, Nick Pasacreta, Elizabeth Ercolano, Ruth McCorkle.   

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition of the impact psychosocial distress has on the quality of life of patients with cancer, the implementation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Distress Management Guidelines and the mandate of evidence-based policy for routine distress screening continue to lag. To speed adoption of the guideline, the American Psychosocial Oncology Society (APOS) and Yale School of Nursing (YSN) launched the Screening for Psychosocial Distress Program in 2014. The program resulted in the development of five steps necessary to carry out routine psychosocial distress screening. The steps are consistent with the NCCN Distress Management Guidelines and the new criterion for accreditation by the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Commission on Cancer as of 2015. These five steps are as follows: (1) screening, (2) evaluating, (3) referring, (4) following up, and (5) documenting and quality improvement. The purpose of this article is to summarize the detailed procedure of the five steps for cancer care professionals-including oncologists, nurses, psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers-so they can manage psychosocial distress efficiently in their own clinical environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25824699      PMCID: PMC4918509          DOI: 10.1007/s11912-015-0447-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  26 in total

1.  Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Wai Tat Chiu; Olga Demler; Kathleen R Merikangas; Ellen E Walters
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06

2.  Interdisciplinary programmatic approaches to comprehensive distress screening for implementing the quality care standard of whole-patient care.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Ruth McCorkle; Margaret Fitch
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2013-08-05

3.  Distress, problems and referral wish of cancer patients: differences according to relationship status and life phase.

Authors:  Marrit A Tuinman; F M Van Nuenen; M Hagedoorn; J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Nursing expertise and the evaluation of psychosocial distress in patients with cancer and survivors.

Authors:  Judith M Estes; Clare Karten
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.027

5.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Recommendations for the implementation of distress screening programs in cancer centers: report from the American Psychosocial Oncology Society (APOS), Association of Oncology Social Work (AOSW), and Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) joint task force.

Authors:  William F Pirl; Jesse R Fann; Joseph A Greer; Ilana Braun; Teresa Deshields; Caryl Fulcher; Elizabeth Harvey; Jimmie Holland; Vicki Kennedy; Mark Lazenby; Lynne Wagner; Meghan Underhill; Deborah K Walker; James Zabora; Bradley Zebrack; Wayne A Bardwell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Linda E Carlson; Shannon L Groff; Olga Maciejewski; Barry D Bultz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Comparing the distress thermometer (DT) with the patient health questionnaire (PHQ)-2 for screening for possible cases of depression among patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Jane Dixon; Mei Bai; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2014-02

9.  From distress guidelines to developing models of psychosocial care: current best practices.

Authors:  Paul G Clark; Sage Bolte; Joanne Buzaglo; Mitch Golant; Louisa Daratsos; Matthew Loscalzo
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2012

10.  Are needs assessments cost effective in reducing distress among patients with cancer? A randomized controlled trial using the Distress Thermometer and Problem List.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Chris Metcalfe; Susana Mancero; Susan Harris; Rona Campbell; Lucy Biddle; Denise McKell-Redwood; James Brennan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  11 in total

1.  Using the RE-AIM framework for dissemination and implementation of psychosocial distress screening.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Hui Tan; Leah Ferrucci; Terry Badger; Marcia Grant; Paul Jacobsen; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Barriers and facilitators to implementing the commission on cancer's distress screening program standard.

Authors:  Andrea K Knies; Devika R Jutagir; Elizabeth Ercolano; Nicholas Pasacreta; Mark Lazenby; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2018-06-08

3.  Associations of Physical and Psychologic Symptom Burden in Patients With Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Daniel C McFarland; Kelly M Shaffer; Heather Polizzi; John Mascarenhas; Marina Kremyanskaya; Jimmie Holland; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.386

4.  Psychosocial Distress Screening: An Educational Program's Impact on Participants' Goals for Screening Implementation in Routine Cancer Care.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Andrea Knies; Nick Pasacreta; Marcia Grant; Jimmie C Holland; Paul B Jacobsen; Terry Badger; Devika R Jutagir; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.027

5.  Managing Psychosocial Distress: Lessons Learned in Optimizing Screening Program Implementation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ercolano; Emma Hoffman; Hui Tan; Nicholas Pasacreta; Mark Lazenby; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Distress and Psychosocial Needs in Patients Accessing a Cancer Day Surgery Division: Implications for Clinical Decision Making.

Authors:  Paola Arnaboldi; Silvia Riva; Valeria Vadilonga; Liliana Tadini; Giorgio Magon; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-27

Review 7.  Advancing psychosocial care in cancer patients.

Authors:  Luigi Grassi; David Spiegel; Michelle Riba
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-04

8.  Implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for Symptom Distress Screening at a Community Cancer Center: A Pilot Program.

Authors:  David Hui; Annie Titus; Tiffany Curtis; Vivian Trang Ho-Nguyen; Delisa Frederickson; Curtis Wray; Tenisha Granville; Eduardo Bruera; Donna K McKee; Alyssa Rieber
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-05-05

9.  Mental health care in oncology. Contemporary perspective on the psychosocial burden of cancer and evidence-based interventions.

Authors:  R Caruso; W Breitbart
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 6.892

10.  Using a Quality Improvement Model to Implement Distress Screening in a Community Cancer Setting.

Authors:  Nancy Jo Bush; Joy R Goebel; Kholoud Hardan-Khalil; Kayo Matsumoto
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2020-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.