Literature DB >> 20940193

Screening for distress in lung and breast cancer outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

Linda E Carlson1, Shannon L Groff, Olga Maciejewski, Barry D Bultz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Distress has been recognized as the sixth vital sign in cancer care and several guidelines recommend routine screening. Despite this, screening for distress is rarely conducted and infrequently evaluated.
METHODS: A program of routine online screening for distress was implemented for new patients with breast and lung cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) minimal screening: the distress thermometer (DT) only plus usual care; (2) full screening: DT, problem checklist, Psychological Screen for Cancer part C measuring anxiety and depression, a personalized report summarizing concerns and the report on the medical file; or (3) triage: full screening plus optional personalized phone triage with referral to resources. Patients in all conditions received an information packet and were reassessed 3 months later with the full screening battery.
RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-five patients with breast cancer and 549 patients with lung cancer were assessed at baseline (89% of all patients), and 75.5% retained for follow-up. High prevalence of baseline distress was found across patients. Twenty percent fewer patients with lung cancer in triage continued to have high distress at follow-up compared to those in the other two groups, and patients with breast cancer in the full screening and triage conditions showed lower distress at follow-up than those in minimal screening. The best predictor of decreased anxiety and depression in full screening and triage conditions was receiving a referral to psychosocial services.
CONCLUSION: Routine online screening is feasible in a large cancer center and may help to reduce future distress levels, particularly when coupled with uptake of appropriate resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20940193     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.3698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  100 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial care in cancer.

Authors:  Samantha B Artherholt; Jesse R Fann
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  Re-rethinking the article by Thombs and colleagues.

Authors:  Wolfgang Linden; Andrea Vodermaier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Using the RE-AIM framework for dissemination and implementation of psychosocial distress screening.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Hui Tan; Leah Ferrucci; Terry Badger; Marcia Grant; Paul Jacobsen; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.520

4.  Developing a clinical pathway for the identification and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients: an online Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  Joanne M Shaw; Melanie A Price; Josephine M Clayton; Peter Grimison; Tim Shaw; Nicole Rankin; Phyllis N Butow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Effects of web-based instruction and patient preferences on patient-reported outcomes and learning for women with advanced ovarian cancer: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sue V Petzel; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Julie Cragg; Molly McClellan; Daniel Chan; Julie A Jacko; François Sainfort; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2018-05-23

6.  A Pilot Mobile-based Mindfulness Intervention for Cancer Patients and their Informal Caregivers.

Authors:  Ai Kubo; Andrea Altschuler; Elaine Kurtovich; Sarah Hendlish; Cecile A Laurent; Tatjana Kolevska; Yan Li; Andrew Avins
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2018-03-24

7.  A cross sectional analysis from a single institution's experience of psychosocial distress and health-related quality of life in the primary brain tumor population.

Authors:  Dina M Randazzo; Frances McSherry; James E Herndon; Mary Lou Affronti; Eric S Lipp; Charlene Flahiff; Elizabeth Miller; Sarah Woodring; Maria Freeman; Patrick Healy; Janet Minchew; Susan Boulton; Annick Desjardins; Gordana Vlahovic; Henry S Friedman; Stephen Keir; Katherine B Peters
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Discriminatory power of a 25-item distress screening tool: a cross-sectional survey of 251 cancer survivors.

Authors:  Melissa F Miller; C Daniel Mullins; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Mitch Golant; Joanne S Buzaglo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Psychological impact of male breast disorders: literature review and survey results.

Authors:  Mike Kipling; Jane E M Ralph; Keith Callanan
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Setting standards for severity of common symptoms in oncology using the PROMIS item banks and expert judgment.

Authors:  David Cella; Seung Choi; Sofia Garcia; Karon F Cook; Sarah Rosenbloom; Jin-Shei Lai; Donna Surges Tatum; Richard Gershon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.