Literature DB >> 25345693

Distress, problems and referral wish of cancer patients: differences according to relationship status and life phase.

Marrit A Tuinman1, F M Van Nuenen2,3, M Hagedoorn1, J E H M Hoekstra-Weebers2,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine differences in distress, problems and referral wish in cancer patients according to relationship status and life phase.
METHODS: A cross-sectional group of 1340 patients (response = 51%) completed socio-demographic and illness-related questions, and the Dutch version of the Distress Thermometer and Problem List that also assesses desire for additional care (yes, maybe and no). Relationship status was categorized into six groups (married, cohabiting, LAT (=living-apart-together: have a partner but live alone), divorced, widowed or single) and age into young (18-50), middle aged (51-65) and older (65+) cohorts.
RESULTS: Relationship status and life phase were independently related to high distress, referral wish and accordance between the latter two. Single and LAT patients were around two times more likely than married patients to be highly distressed, and wanting additional care. The same was found for younger patients as compared to 65+ patients. Whereas high distress is usually not a strong indication for additional care needs, single, LAT and younger patients most often wanted care when they were highly distressed.
CONCLUSION: Health care professionals who implement distress screening in practice can expect a higher need for additional care in single and LAT patients, but only when they are younger or middle aged. The benefit of having a partner around on a daily basis seems less important in dealing with cancer-related problems when patients are older.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; distress; oncology; referral wish; relationship status; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25345693     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  9 in total

1.  The five steps of comprehensive psychosocial distress screening.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Hui Tan; Nick Pasacreta; Elizabeth Ercolano; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Psychological distress among Indigenous Australian cancer survivors.

Authors:  Gail Garvey; J Cunningham; M Janda; V Yf He; P C Valery
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Patient-reported distress and age-related stress biomarkers among colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Hyrum S Eddington; Megan McLeod; Amber W Trickey; Nicolas Barreto; Katherine Maturen; Arden M Morris
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.452

4.  Chronic multimorbidity impairs role functioning in middle-aged and older individuals mostly when non-partnered or living alone.

Authors:  Fabiola Müller; Mariët Hagedoorn; Marrit A Tuinman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence and related factors of psychological distress among cancer inpatients using routine Distress Thermometer and Chinese Health Questionnaire screening.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Chiou; Nien-Mu Chiu; Liang-Jen Wang; Shau-Hsuan Li; Chun-Yi Lee; Ming-Kung Wu; Chien-Chih Chen; Yi-Shan Wu; Yu Lee
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  Pathways to experiencing mental problems and need for mental support in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Anna D T Muntingh; Sylvia Gerritsen; Neeltje M Batelaan; Harm Jan Bogaard
Journal:  Pulm Circ       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.017

7.  Do single people want to date a cancer survivor? A vignette study.

Authors:  Marrit Annika Tuinman; Vicky Lehmann; Mariët Hagedoorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Widowhood and Life Satisfaction Among Chinese Elderly Adults: The Influences of Lifestyles and Number of Children.

Authors:  Caiyun Yang; Xixi Sun; Wenjie Duan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-01-26

9.  Doctor's recommendations for psychosocial care: Frequency and predictors of recommendations and referrals.

Authors:  Jochen Ernst; Hermann Faller; Uwe Koch; Elmar Brähler; Martin Härter; Holger Schulz; Joachim Weis; Norbert Köhler; Andreas Hinz; Anja Mehnert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.