Literature DB >> 23873231

An institutional six-year trend analysis of the neurological outcome after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year trend analysis of a single institution.

Alexander Aichmair1, Marios G Lykissas, Federico P Girardi, Andrew A Sama, Darren R Lebl, Fadi Taher, Frank P Cammisa, Alexander P Hughes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportional trend over time of neurological deficits after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at a single institution. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Because lumbar nerve roots converge to run as the lumbar plexus within or less frequently underneath the posterior part of the psoas muscle, they are prone to iatrogenic damage during the transpsoas approach in LLIF, and adverse postoperative neurological sequelae remain a major concern.
METHODS: The electronic medical records and office notes of 451 patients who had consecutively undergone LLIF between March 2006 and April 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for reports on postoperative neurological deficits.
RESULTS: A total of 293 patients (173 females and 120 males) met the study inclusion criteria and were followed postoperatively for a mean period of 15.4 ± 9.2 months (range: 6-53 mo). The number of included patients who underwent LLIF at our institution was 47 in the years 2006 to 2008 (group A), 155 in 2009 to 2010 (group B), and 91 in 2011 to 2012 (group C). Our data indicate a decreasing proportional trend during the past 6 years for postoperative sensory deficits (SDs), motor deficits (MDs), and anterior thigh pain (TP). The decreasing trends were statistically significant for the proportion of SDs in the immediate postoperative setting (P = 0.018) and close to statistically significant for SDs at last follow-up (P = 0.126), TP immediately after surgery (P = 0.098), and TP at last follow-up (P = 0.136).
CONCLUSION: To the authors' best knowledge, this study constitutes the largest series of this sort to date, with regard to both sample size and study period. The present data indicate a decreasing proportional trend over time for SDs, MDs, and anterior TP, which can be considered a representation of an institutional learning curve during a 6-year time period of performing LLIF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23873231     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a3d1b4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study.

Authors:  Chong Leslie Lich Ng; Boon Chuan Pang; Paul Julius A Medina; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Selvaraj Dahshaini; Li-Zhen Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Jennifer Shue; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

5.  The incidence and risk factors for post-operative ileus after spinal fusion surgery: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Paul D Kiely; Lauren E Mount; Jerry Y Du; Joseph T Nguyen; Gil Weitzman; Stavros Memstoudis; Seth A Waldman; Darren R Lebl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Indications and timing of revision spine surgery in adults after adolescent surgery for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Andrew Diederich; Jace Erwin; Brandon Carlson; Joshua Bunch; Robert Sean Jackson; Douglas Burton
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-13

7.  Lateral lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of adjacent segment disease: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jerry Y Du; Paul D Kiely; Motasem Al Maaieh; Alexander Aichmair; Russel C Huang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

8.  Early clinical and radiological results of unilateral posterior pedicle instrumentation through a Wiltse approach with lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jerry Y Du; Paul D Kiely; Eric Bogner; Motasem Al Maaieh; Alexander Aichmair; Stephan N Salzmann; Russel C Huang
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-09

9.  Mini-Open Access for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Indications, Technique, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Stephan N Salzmann; Gary A Fantini; Ichiro Okano; Andrew A Sama; Alexander P Hughes; Federico P Girardi
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-11-01

10.  New Intramuscular Electromyographic Monitoring with a Probe in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Shigeto Ebata; Tetsuro Ohba; Hirotaka Haro
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.