Literature DB >> 21160397

A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements.

Leonardo Oliveira1, Luis Marchi, Etevaldo Coutinho, Luiz Pimenta.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized clinical study on the decompressive effect of the extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) procedure.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the results of interbody distraction from a lateral retroperitoneal approach for the treatment of lumbar degenerative conditions inclusive of central and/or lateral stenosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional treatment for symptomatic lumbar stenosis has been by direct posterior decompression (i.e., removal of ligamentum flavum, laminotomy/laminectomy, facetectomy, as needed). Stenotic symptoms may also be alleviated indirectly, through correction of intervertebral and foraminal height and correction of spinal alignment. Anterior-only spinal procedures rely on this indirect decompression when used in patients with radicular symptoms.
METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with degenerative conditions that included concomitant lumbar stenosis were consented and treated via stand-alone XLIF. Pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements were made from plain lateral radiographs and sagittal and axial magnetic resonance imaging views by an independent radiologist using medical imaging software. Measurements included disc height, foraminal height, foraminal area, and canal diameter.
RESULTS: In all, 7 male and 14 female patients (mean age, 67.6 years; range, 40-83) underwent XLIF at 43 lumbar levels in an average operative time of 47 minutes and with an average 23 mL estimated blood loss per level. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean hospital stay was 29.5 hours. Transient postoperative psoas weakness occurred in 3 (14.3%) of the cases. Substantial dimensional improvement was evidenced in all radiographic parameters, with increases of 41.9% in average disc height, 13.5% in foraminal height, 24.7% in foraminal area, and 33.1% in central canal diameter. Two patients (9.5%) required a second procedure for additional posterior decompression and/or instrumentation.
CONCLUSION: The XLIF procedure provides the necessary decompression for the treatment of central and/orlateral stenosis in a minimally disruptive way, avoiding, in most cases, the need for the direct resection of posterior elements and associated morbidities. Indirect decompression may be limited in cases of congenital stenosis and/or locked facets. Its effect may also be reduced by postoperative subsidence and/or loss of correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21160397     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182022db0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  123 in total

1.  The surgical vascular anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody approach: a cadaveric and radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkadhim; Carmine Zoccali; Salman Abbasifard; Mauricio J Avila; Apar S Patel; Kamran Sattarov; Christina M Walter; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review.

Authors:  Branko Skovrlj; Patrick Belton; Hekmat Zarzour; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

3.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Rational decision making in a wide scenario of different minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion approaches and devices.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Antoine Tohmeh; David Jones; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Bruce C Pittman; Hyun Bae
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-03

5.  Anterior elongation as a minimally invasive alternative for sagittal imbalance-a case series.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Carlos Castro; Thiago Coutinho; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-13

6.  Prospective evaluation of 1-year outcomes in single-level percutaneous lumbar transfacet screw fixation in the lateral decubitus position following lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Jay W Rhee; Rory J Petteys; Amjad N Anaizi; Faheem A Sandhu; Jean-Marc Voyadzis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Central and foraminal indirect decompression in MIS lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): video lecture.

Authors:  Eric H Elowitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics.

Authors:  Jeff A Lehmen; Edward J Gerber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  [Extreme lateral interbody fusion. Indication, surgical technique, outcomes and specific complications].

Authors:  Markus Quante; Henry Halm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  The learning curve of lateral access lumbar interbody fusion in an Asian population: a prospective study.

Authors:  Chong Leslie Lich Ng; Boon Chuan Pang; Paul Julius A Medina; Kimberly-Anne Tan; Selvaraj Dahshaini; Li-Zhen Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.