Jessica M Loaring1, Michael Larkin1, Rachel Shaw2, Paul Flowers3. 1. School of Psychology. 2. School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University. 3. Institute for Applied Health Research, Glasgow Caledonian University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer diagnosis and treatments can have a profound impact upon women's well-being, body image, and sexual functioning, but less is known about the relational context of their coping and the impact upon their intimate partners. Our study focuses upon couples' experiences of breast cancer surgery, and its impact on body image and sexual intimacy. METHOD: Utilizing a dyadic design, we conducted 8 semistructured individual interviews, with 4 long-term heterosexual couples, after the women had undergone mastectomy with reconstruction. Interviews explored both partners' experiences of diagnosis, decision-making, and experiences of body image and sexual intimacy. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was adopted; this is a qualitative research approach characterized by in-depth analysis of the personal meaning of experiences. RESULTS: Findings illustrate the positive acceptance that partners may express toward their wives' postsurgical bodies. They illuminate ways in which gendered coping styles and normative sexual scripts may shape couples' negotiations of intimacy around "altered embodiment." Reciprocal communication styles were important for couples' coping. The management of expectations regarding breast reconstruction may also be helpful. CONCLUSIONS: The insights from the dyadic, multiple perspective design suggest that psychologists must situate the meaning of supportive relationships and other protective factors in the context of complex life events and histories, in order to understand and support people's developing responses to distress. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE:Breast cancer diagnosis and treatments can have a profound impact upon women's well-being, body image, and sexual functioning, but less is known about the relational context of their coping and the impact upon their intimate partners. Our study focuses upon couples' experiences of breast cancer surgery, and its impact on body image and sexual intimacy. METHOD: Utilizing a dyadic design, we conducted 8 semistructured individual interviews, with 4 long-term heterosexual couples, after the women had undergone mastectomy with reconstruction. Interviews explored both partners' experiences of diagnosis, decision-making, and experiences of body image and sexual intimacy. Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) was adopted; this is a qualitative research approach characterized by in-depth analysis of the personal meaning of experiences. RESULTS: Findings illustrate the positive acceptance that partners may express toward their wives' postsurgical bodies. They illuminate ways in which gendered coping styles and normative sexual scripts may shape couples' negotiations of intimacy around "altered embodiment." Reciprocal communication styles were important for couples' coping. The management of expectations regarding breast reconstruction may also be helpful. CONCLUSIONS: The insights from the dyadic, multiple perspective design suggest that psychologists must situate the meaning of supportive relationships and other protective factors in the context of complex life events and histories, in order to understand and support people's developing responses to distress. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Lauren A Zimmaro; Stephen J Lepore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2020-04-04
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen Sorice; Stephen J Lepore; Mary B Daly; James A Tulsky; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Natalie M Oppenheimer; Katherine Clegg Smith; Sharon L Bober; Elissa T Bantug; Sharon C Schwartz; Laura S Porter Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Laura S Porter; Kristen E Casale; Elissa T Bantug; Sharon L Bober; Sharon C Schwartz; Katherine Clegg Smith Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Harper G Hubbeling; Shoshana M Rosenberg; Maria Cecilia González-Robledo; Julia G Cohn; Cynthia Villarreal-Garza; Ann H Partridge; Felicia M Knaul Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jennifer Barsky Reese; Lauren A Zimmaro; Stephen J Lepore; Kristen A Sorice; Elizabeth Handorf; Mary B Daly; Leslie R Schover; Deborah Kashy; Kelly Westbrook; Laura S Porter Journal: Trials Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 2.279