Literature DB >> 27657981

Adapting a couple-based intimacy enhancement intervention to breast cancer: A developmental study.

Jennifer Barsky Reese1, Laura S Porter2, Kristen E Casale1, Elissa T Bantug3, Sharon L Bober4, Sharon C Schwartz5, Katherine Clegg Smith6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sexual concerns continue to be poorly addressed for women treated for breast cancer and evidence-based interventions that adequately address these concerns are scarce. The objective of this study was to adapt a telephone-based intimacy enhancement intervention, previously tested in couples facing colorectal cancer, to the needs of women with breast cancer through qualitative focus groups, cognitive interviews, and expert review.
METHOD: Three semistructured qualitative focus groups in partnered posttreatment breast cancer survivors (n = 15) reporting sexual concerns were conducted to investigate experiences of breast cancer-related sexual concerns and intervention preferences. Focus group data were coded using the framework approach to qualitative analysis; 8 key themes were identified and used to develop the content and format of the intervention. Feedback from cognitive interviews with study-naïve breast cancer survivors (n = 4) and expert review of materials were also incorporated in finalizing the intervention materials.
RESULTS: Qualitative findings centered on the impact of breast cancer and its treatment on women's sexuality and on the intimate relationship, experiences of helpful and unhelpful coping methods, and explicit intervention preferences. Focus group data were particularly helpful in identifying the scope of educational topics and in determining how to structure intervention skills practice (e.g., intimacy-related communication) to be optimally relevant and helpful for both women and their partners. Cognitive interview feedback helped refine intervention materials.
CONCLUSION: An intimacy enhancement intervention was adapted for women with breast cancer and their partners. This intervention offers a promising, potentially disseminable approach to addressing breast cancer-related sexual concerns. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27657981      PMCID: PMC5034713          DOI: 10.1037/hea0000413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  47 in total

1.  Information needs and experiences: an audit of UK cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Cox; Valerie Jenkins; Susan Catt; Carolyn Langridge; Lesley Fallowfield
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 2.398

2.  Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®).

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Diana D Jeffery; Francis J Keefe; Laura S Porter; Rebecca A Shelby; Maria R Fawzy; Tracy K Gosselin; Bryce B Reeve; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Detecting and discussing sexual problems during chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sally Taylor; Clare Harley; Elena Takeuchi; Julia Brown; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Assessing gynecologic and breast cancer survivors' sexual health care needs.

Authors:  Emily K Hill; Stacey Sandbo; Emily Abramsohn; Jennifer Makelarski; Kristen Wroblewski; Emily R Wenrich; Stacy McCoy; Sarah M Temkin; S Diane Yamada; Stacy T Lindau
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Predictors of sexual health in women after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  P A Ganz; K A Desmond; T R Belin; B E Meyerowitz; J H Rowland
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer.

Authors:  Sharon Manne; Hoda Badr
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The impact of endocrine therapy on sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer: encouraging results from a prospective study.

Authors:  Dominique Frechette; Lise Paquet; Shailendra Verma; Mark Clemons; Paul Wheatley-Price; Stan Z Gertler; Xinni Song; Nadine Graham; Susan Dent
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for sexual dysfunctions in women treated for breast cancer: design of a multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Susanna B Hummel; Jacques J D M van Lankveld; Hester S A Oldenburg; Daniela E E Hahn; Eva Broomans; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  14 in total

1.  Communication about Sexual Health in Breast Cancer: What Can We Learn from Patients' Self-Report and Clinic Dialogue?

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Lauren A Zimmaro; Stephen J Lepore; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2020-04-04

2.  Patient-clinician communication about sexual health in breast cancer: A mixed-methods analysis of clinic dialogue.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen Sorice; Stephen J Lepore; Mary B Daly; James A Tulsky; Mary Catherine Beach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-10-04

3.  Why do breast cancer survivors decline a couple-based intimacy enhancement intervention trial?

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Natalie M Oppenheimer; Katherine Clegg Smith; Sharon L Bober; Elissa T Bantug; Sharon C Schwartz; Laura S Porter
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Effective patient-provider communication about sexual concerns in breast cancer: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Mary Catherine Beach; Katherine Clegg Smith; Elissa T Bantug; Kristen E Casale; Laura S Porter; Sharon L Bober; James A Tulsky; Mary B Daly; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Including partners in discussions of sexual side effects from breast cancer: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and providers.

Authors:  Kelly M Shaffer; Erin Kennedy; Jillian V Glazer; Anita H Clayton; Wendy Cohn; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Trish A Millard; Karen S Ingersoll; Lee M Ritterband; Shayna Showalter
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.359

6.  Talking about women's sexual health after cancer: Why is it so hard to move the needle?

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Sharon L Bober; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Improvement in sexual function after ovarian cancer: Effects of sexual therapy and rehabilitation after treatment for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Christopher J Recklitis; Alexis L Michaud; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Addressing sexual concerns of female breast cancer survivors and partners: a qualitative study of survivors, partners, and oncology providers about Internet intervention preferences.

Authors:  Kelly M Shaffer; Erin Kennedy; Jillian V Glazer; Anita H Clayton; Wendy Cohn; Trish A Millard; Lee M Ritterband; Shayna Showalter
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Efficacy of a multimedia intervention in facilitating breast cancer patients' clinical communication about sexual health: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer B Reese; Kristen A Sorice; Whitney Pollard; Elizabeth Handorf; Mary C Beach; Mary B Daly; Laura S Porter; James A Tulsky; Stephen J Lepore
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used for Assessing Breast Sensation after Mastectomy: Not Fit for Purpose.

Authors:  Hansje P Smeele; Rachel C H Dijkstra; Merel L Kimman; René R W J van der Hulst; Stefania M H Tuinder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.