Literature DB >> 25819793

New Insights into the Post-Translational Regulation of DNA Damage Response and Double-Strand Break Repair in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Hyun-Min Kim1, Monica P Colaiácovo2.   

Abstract

Although a growing number of studies have reported the importance of SUMOylation in genome maintenance and DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR), relevant target proteins and how this modification regulates their functions are yet to be clarified. Here, we analyzed SUMOylation of ZTF-8, the homolog of mammalian RHINO, to test the functional significance of this protein modification in the DSBR and DNA damage response (DDR) pathways in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline. We found that ZTF-8 is a direct target for SUMOylation in vivo and that its modification is required for DNA damage checkpoint induced apoptosis and DSBR. Non-SUMOylatable mutants of ZTF-8 mimic the phenotypes observed in ztf-8 null mutants, including reduced fertility, impaired DNA damage repair, and defective DNA damage checkpoint activation. However, while mutants for components acting in the SUMOylation pathway fail to properly localize ZTF-8, its localization is not altered in the ZTF-8 non-SUMOylatable mutants. Taken together, these data show that direct SUMOylation of ZTF-8 is required for its function in DSBR as well as DDR but not its localization. ZTF-8's human ortholog is enriched in the germline, but its meiotic role as well as its post-translational modification has never been explored. Therefore, our discovery may assist in understanding the regulatory mechanism of this protein in DSBR and DDR in the germline.
Copyright © 2015 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caenorhabditis elegans; DNA damage response; SUMOylation; ZTF-8; double-strand break repair; germline

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25819793      PMCID: PMC4492375          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.115.175661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

1.  SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting.

Authors:  M S Rodriguez; C Dargemont; R T Hay
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-12-21       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  High-throughput yeast two-hybrid assays for large-scale protein interaction mapping.

Authors:  A J Walhout; M Vidal
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 3.  Protein modification by SUMO.

Authors:  Erica S Johnson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 4.  SUMO: a history of modification.

Authors:  Ronald T Hay
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on.

Authors:  Ruth Geiss-Friedlander; Frauke Melchior
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 94.444

6.  A DNA damage response screen identifies RHINO, a 9-1-1 and TopBP1 interacting protein required for ATR signaling.

Authors:  Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino; E Robert McDonald; Kristen Hurov; Mathew E Sowa; J Wade Harper; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Methods for studying the DNA damage response in the Caenorhabdatis elegans germ line.

Authors:  Ashley L Craig; Sandra C Moser; Aymeric P Bailly; Anton Gartner
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.441

8.  The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  S Brenner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Yubin Xie; Yueyuan Zheng; Shuai Jiang; Wenzhong Liu; Weiping Mu; Zexian Liu; Yong Zhao; Yu Xue; Jian Ren
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Sumoylation and the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Catherine A Cremona; Prabha Sarangi; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2012-09-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  The relationship between five non-synonymous polymorphisms within three XRCC genes and gastric cancer risk in a Han Chinese population.

Authors:  Huansong Gong; He Li; Jing Zou; Jia Mi; Fang Liu; Dan Wang; Dong Yan; Bin Wang; Shuping Zhang; Geng Tian
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-21

2.  CRISPR-Cas9-Guided Genome Engineering in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Hyun-Min Kim; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Wrestling with Chromosomes: The Roles of SUMO During Meiosis.

Authors:  Amanda C Nottke; Hyun-Min Kim; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Histone Demethylase AMX-1 Regulates Fertility in a p53/CEP-1 Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Xiaojing Ren; Sisi Tian; Qinghao Meng; Hyun-Min Kim
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  CRISPR-Cas9-Guided Genome Engineering in C. elegans.

Authors:  Hyun-Min Kim; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  Fanconi Anemia FANCM/FNCM-1 and FANCD2/FCD-2 Are Required for Maintaining Histone Methylation Levels and Interact with the Histone Demethylase LSD1/SPR-5 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Hyun-Min Kim; Sara E Beese-Sims; Monica P Colaiácovo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Exposure to the BPA-Substitute Bisphenol S Causes Unique Alterations of Germline Function.

Authors:  Yichang Chen; Le Shu; Zhiqun Qiu; Dong Yeon Lee; Sara J Settle; Shane Que Hee; Donatello Telesca; Xia Yang; Patrick Allard
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  BRCA1-BARD1 associate with the synaptonemal complex and pro-crossover factors and influence RAD-51 dynamics during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis.

Authors:  Eva Janisiw; Maria Rosaria Dello Stritto; Verena Jantsch; Nicola Silva
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.