Robert L Coleman1, Michael W Sill2, Katherine Bell-McGuinn3, Carol Aghajanian3, Heidi J Gray4, Krishnansu S Tewari5, Steven C Rubin6, Thomas J Rutherford7, John K Chan8, Alice Chen9, Elizabeth M Swisher10. 1. Dept. of Gynecologic Oncology & Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. Electronic address: rcoleman@mdanderson.org. 2. NRG Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. 3. Medical Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. 4. University of Washington, Dept. of OB/GYN, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 5. University of California Irvine Medical Center, Irvine Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Orange, CA 92868, USA. 6. Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA. 7. Yale University School of Medicine, Division of GYN Oncology, New Haven, CT 06520, USA. 8. Palo Alto Medical Foundation, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. 9. Investigational Drug Branch Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. 10. University of Washington and the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Puget Sound Oncology Consortium, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Veliparib is a potent small molecule inhibitor of PARP-1/2, which is cytotoxic in tumor cells with deficiencies in BRCA1 or BRCA2. We studied the clinical activity and toxicity of veliparib in ovarian cancer patients carrying a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (gBRCA). METHODS: Eligibility included three or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, measurable disease and no prior use of a PARP inhibitor. Veliparib was administered at 400mg orally BID with one cycle being 28days. The two-stage Simon design was capable of detecting a 25% response probability with 90% power while controlling alpha=10% (at a 10% assumed null response probability). RESULTS: The median age of the 50 eligible patients was 57years (range 37-94) and 14, 18, and 18 patients had 1, 2, and 3 prior therapies respectively. Thirty patients (60%) were platinum-resistant. The median number of cycles administered was 6 (1-27). There was one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 adverse events were: fatigue (n=3), nausea (2), leukopenia (1), neutropenia (1), dehydration (1), and ALT (1). Grade 2 events >10% were: nausea (46%), fatigue (26%), vomiting (18%), and anemia (14%). The proportion responding was 26% (90% CI: 16%-38%, CR: 2, PR: 11); for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive patients the proportion responding was 20% and 35%, respectively. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progression (62%). Twenty-nine patients are alive; two with SD remain on veliparib. The median PFS is 8.18months. CONCLUSIONS: The single agent efficacy and tolerability of veliparib for BRCA mutation-associated recurrent ovarian cancer warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND:Veliparib is a potent small molecule inhibitor of PARP-1/2, which is cytotoxic in tumor cells with deficiencies in BRCA1 or BRCA2. We studied the clinical activity and toxicity of veliparib in ovarian cancerpatients carrying a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (gBRCA). METHODS: Eligibility included three or fewer prior chemotherapy regimens, measurable disease and no prior use of a PARP inhibitor. Veliparib was administered at 400mg orally BID with one cycle being 28days. The two-stage Simon design was capable of detecting a 25% response probability with 90% power while controlling alpha=10% (at a 10% assumed null response probability). RESULTS: The median age of the 50 eligible patients was 57years (range 37-94) and 14, 18, and 18 patients had 1, 2, and 3 prior therapies respectively. Thirty patients (60%) were platinum-resistant. The median number of cycles administered was 6 (1-27). There was one grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 adverse events were: fatigue (n=3), nausea (2), leukopenia (1), neutropenia (1), dehydration (1), and ALT (1). Grade 2 events >10% were: nausea (46%), fatigue (26%), vomiting (18%), and anemia (14%). The proportion responding was 26% (90% CI: 16%-38%, CR: 2, PR: 11); for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive patients the proportion responding was 20% and 35%, respectively. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was progression (62%). Twenty-nine patients are alive; two with SD remain on veliparib. The median PFS is 8.18months. CONCLUSIONS: The single agent efficacy and tolerability of veliparib for BRCA mutation-associated recurrent ovarian cancer warrants further investigation.
Authors: Christopher S Bryant; Sanjeev Kumar; Whitney Spannuth; Jay P Shah; Adnan R Munkarah; Gunter Deppe; Ronald D Alvarez; Robert T Morris Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2010-04-11 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Samuel F Bunting; Elsa Callén; Nancy Wong; Hua-Tang Chen; Federica Polato; Amanda Gunn; Anne Bothmer; Niklas Feldhahn; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Liu Cao; Xiaoling Xu; Chu-Xia Deng; Toren Finkel; Michel Nussenzweig; Jeremy M Stark; André Nussenzweig Journal: Cell Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Stan B Kaye; Jan Lubinski; Ursula Matulonis; Joo Ern Ang; Charlie Gourley; Beth Y Karlan; Amit Amnon; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Lee-May Chen; Michael Friedlander; Tamar Safra; Ignace Vergote; Mark Wickens; Elizabeth S Lowe; James Carmichael; Bella Kaufman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Barbara Norquist; Kaitlyn A Wurz; Christopher C Pennil; Rochelle Garcia; Jenny Gross; Wataru Sakai; Beth Y Karlan; Toshiyasu Taniguchi; Elizabeth M Swisher Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Bryan T J Hennessy; Kirsten M Timms; Mark S Carey; Alexander Gutin; Larissa A Meyer; Darl D Flake; Victor Abkevich; Jennifer Potter; Dmitry Pruss; Pat Glenn; Yang Li; Jie Li; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Karen Smith McCune; Maurie Markman; Russell R Broaddus; Jerry S Lanchbury; Karen H Lu; Gordon B Mills Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shahneen K Sandhu; William R Schelman; George Wilding; Victor Moreno; Richard D Baird; Susana Miranda; Lucy Hylands; Ruth Riisnaes; Martin Forster; Aurelius Omlin; Nathan Kreischer; Khin Thway; Heidrun Gevensleben; Linda Sun; John Loughney; Manash Chatterjee; Carlo Toniatti; Christopher L Carpenter; Robert Iannone; Stan B Kaye; Johann S de Bono; Robert M Wenham Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Junko Murai; Shar-yin N Huang; Benu Brata Das; Amelie Renaud; Yiping Zhang; James H Doroshow; Jiuping Ji; Shunichi Takeda; Yves Pommier Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Kathleen N Moore; Austin Miller; Katherine M Bell-McGuinn; Russell J Schilder; Joan L Walker; Roisin E O'Cearbhaill; Saketh R Guntupalli; Deborah K Armstrong; Andrea R Hagemann; Heidi J Gray; Linda R Duska; Cara A Mathews; Alice Chen; David O'Malley; Sarah Gordon; Paula M Fracasso; Carol Aghajanian Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Rashid Gabbasov; I Daniel Benrubi; Shane W O'Brien; John J Krais; Neil Johnson; Samuel Litwin; Denise C Connolly Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Aliyah Almomen; Elke A Jarboe; Mark K Dodson; C Matthew Peterson; Shawn C Owen; Margit M Janát-Amsbury Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Levani Zandarashvili; Marie-France Langelier; Uday Kiran Velagapudi; Mark A Hancock; Jamin D Steffen; Ramya Billur; Zain M Hannan; Andrew J Wicks; Dragomir B Krastev; Stephen J Pettitt; Christopher J Lord; Tanaji T Talele; John M Pascal; Ben E Black Journal: Science Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Robert L Coleman; Gini F Fleming; Mark F Brady; Elizabeth M Swisher; Karina D Steffensen; Michael Friedlander; Aikou Okamoto; Kathleen N Moore; Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch; Theresa L Werner; Noelle G Cloven; Ana Oaknin; Paul A DiSilvestro; Mark A Morgan; Joo-Hyun Nam; Charles A Leath; Shibani Nicum; Andrea R Hagemann; Ramey D Littell; David Cella; Sally Baron-Hay; Jesus Garcia-Donas; Mika Mizuno; Katherine Bell-McGuinn; Danielle M Sullivan; Bruce A Bach; Sudipta Bhattacharya; Christine K Ratajczak; Peter J Ansell; Minh H Dinh; Carol Aghajanian; Michael A Bookman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-09-28 Impact factor: 91.245