Literature DB >> 20383771

Feasibility of extension of platinum-free interval with weekly bolus topotecan and subsequent platinum retreatment outcomes in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Christopher S Bryant1, Sanjeev Kumar, Whitney Spannuth, Jay P Shah, Adnan R Munkarah, Gunter Deppe, Ronald D Alvarez, Robert T Morris.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes and response in a cohort of patients with presumed platinum-sensitive disease who were subsequently retreated with platinum after receiving weekly bolus topotecan at the time of initial recurrence.
METHODS: A retrospective review of our institutional databases identified a cohort of platinum-sensitive women with recurrent ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. Antitumor responses and toxicities were assessed for patients retreated with platinum-based chemotherapy following weekly bolus topotecan (4 mg/m²).
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (median age 63 years, range 45-80 years) were identified. Advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian carcinoma was most common (96%). Residual disease after primary cytoreductive surgery was less than 1 cm in 65% of the cohort. Platinum retreatment was well tolerated. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred most commonly (8%) without any episodes of grade 4 myelotoxicity. Fatigue (12%) and hypersensitivity reaction (15%) were the most common non-hematologic toxicities during platinum retreatment. Of the 26 patients, 5 (19%) had a complete response, 5 (19%) had a partial response, 10 (39%) had stable disease, and 6 (23%) had progressive disease. Thirty-nine percent of patients with stable or progressive disease during weekly bolus topotecan responded to subsequent platinum retreatment. Response to platinum retreatment, treatment-free interval, and platinum-free interval was significant prognosticators for survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION(S): The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that weekly bolus topotecan, as intervening non-platinum, may result in acceptable toxicities and response rates during platinum retreatment in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20383771     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-010-1462-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  A phase II evaluation of the potent, highly selective PARP inhibitor veliparib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer in patients who carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation - An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Robert L Coleman; Michael W Sill; Katherine Bell-McGuinn; Carol Aghajanian; Heidi J Gray; Krishnansu S Tewari; Steven C Rubin; Thomas J Rutherford; John K Chan; Alice Chen; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Treatment options in recurrent ovarian cancer: latest evidence and clinical potential.

Authors:  Daniela Luvero; Andrea Milani; Jonathan A Ledermann
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 3.  Recurrent ovarian cancer: when and how to treat.

Authors:  Marcia Hall; Gordon Rustin
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Role of autophagy in cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Gen Sheng Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  PARP Inhibitor in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Single-Center Real-World Experience.

Authors:  Amit Agarwal; Saphalta Baghmar; Chandragouda Dodagoudar; Suhail Qureshi; Aseem Khurana; Vikas Vaibhav; Guresh Kumar
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.