Literature DB >> 25814146

The effect of age on functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

Philipp Mandel1, Markus Graefen2, Uwe Michl2, Hartwig Huland2, Derya Tilki3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: As life expectancy increases, functional outcomes in elderly patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) become a more important factor to consider in treatment selection. The aim of this study was to determine age-dependent differences in functional outcomes after RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 8,295 patients who underwent RP from January 2009 to July 2013 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to estimate the effect of age and other covariates on 3- and 12-month continence and potency rates. Continence was achieved if no more than one safety pad was used per day. Potency was defined as an international index of erectile function (IIEF)-5 score of 18 or higher.
RESULTS: In the entire cohort, 12-month (3-mo) continence and potency rates were 91.0% (76.1%) and 54.6% (40.9%), respectively. The 1-year continence rates for age groups < 65, ≥ 65 and < 70, ≥ 70 and < 75, and ≥ 75 years were 93.2%, 90.8%, 86.0%, and 86.5%, respectively. The corresponding 1-year potency rates were 59.3%, 46.9%, 44.4%, and 31.3%. In both, univariate and multivariate analyses, older age had a significant negative effect on functional outcomes. Moreover, nerve sparing, pT category, and patients' body mass index were significantly associated with continence. Nerve sparing, pT category, patients' body mass index, and use of PDE5 inhibitor or intracavernous injection therapy significantly influenced potency.
CONCLUSIONS: Older age has a significant adverse effect on recovery of continence and potency. Although functional outcomes in elderly patients and especially in patients aged 75 years or older are still good, they should be educated about the increased risk of incontinence and impotence after RP.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Functional outcome; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25814146     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  22 in total

1.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Haseebuddin; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  Tumor characteristics, oncological and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy in very young men ≤ 45 years of age.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Valentin Maurer; Raisa S Pompe; Felix K Chun; Felix Preisser; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Philipp Mandel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Oncological, functional and perioperative outcomes in transplant patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Burkhard Beyer; Philipp Mandel; Uwe Michl; Raisa S Pompe; Valia Veleva; Thomas Steuber; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Radical prostatectomy in locally advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  P Mandel; D Tilki; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Luca Topazio; Michele De Angelis; Enrico Finazzi Agrò; Antonio Luigi Pastore; Andrea Fuschi; Filippo Annino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Postoperative upgrading of prostate cancer in men ≥75 years: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Annika Herlemann; Alexander Buchner; Alexander Kretschmer; Maria Apfelbeck; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Stefan Tritschler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  [Localized intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer].

Authors:  S Tritschler; U Ganswindt; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [Systematic analysis of treatment results as a quality control instrument using the example of a large European center].

Authors:  B Beyer; H Huland; M Graefen
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  The increase of stage, grading, and metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy during the last decade.

Authors:  Vincent Beck; Boris Schlenker; Annika Herlemann; Maria Apfelbeck; Alexander Buchner; Christian Gratzke; Christian G Stief; Stefan Tritschler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) before and after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: does improvement of LUTS mitigate worsened incontinence after robotic prostatectomy?

Authors:  Lukas Dommer; Jan A Birzele; Khosrow Ahmadi; Mario Rampa; Daniel J Stekhoven; Räto T Strebel
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.