Literature DB >> 25812073

Infected Prostheses after Lower-Extremity Bone Tumor Resection: Clinical Outcomes of 100 Patients.

Andreas F Mavrogenis1, Elisa Pala1, Andrea Angelini1, Teresa Calabro1, Carlo Romagnoli1, Matteo Romantini1, Gabriele Drago1, Pietro Ruggieri1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection of megaprostheses after bone tumor resection is a major concern; management is challenging. This study evaluated the survivability from such infections, the microbial isolates, treatment tactics, and outcome of megaprosthesis reconstructions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1,161 patients retrospectively who underwent megaprosthesis reconstruction for limb salvage after a sarcoma from 1983 to 2010. The mean followup was 9 y (range 3-20 y). We evaluated the overall survival of the megaprosthesis reconstructions in patients with infection and the survival with respect to the type of megaprosthesis, site of reconstruction, cemented or cementless fixation, type of tumor, adjuvant treatments, microbial isolate(s), treatment tactics, and outcome.
RESULTS: The incidence of infection was 8.6%. The most common microbial isolate was Staphylococcus epidermidis (47%). Overall survival with definitive management of infection was 88% at 10 y and 84% at 20 y. Survival was higher for cementless reconstructions and not different with respect to the type of megaprosthesis, site of reconstruction, or adjuvant therapy. Infections resolved completely with one- or two-stage surgery in 75% of patients. The rate of amputation because of infection was 21%.
CONCLUSIONS: Megaprosthesis reconstructions may be infected in 8.6% of cases. Infections more commonly occur late, caused usually by S. epidermidis. The survival rate is higher with cementless megaprosthesis reconstructions and no different with respect to the type of tumor or megaprosthesis or the adjuvant treatments. One-stage revision is effective for acute post-operative infections; however, two-stage revision surgery is necessary for early and late infections. The rate of amputation because of occurrence or persistence of megaprosthesis infection is 21%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25812073     DOI: 10.1089/sur.2014.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1096-2964            Impact factor:   2.150


  11 in total

1.  What is the Likelihood That Tumor Endoprostheses Will Experience a Second Complication After First Revision in Patients With Primary Malignant Bone Tumors And What Are Potential Risk Factors?

Authors:  C Theil; J Röder; G Gosheger; N Deventer; R Dieckmann; D Schorn; J Hardes; D Andreou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.

Authors:  Teresa Calabró; Rupert Van Rooyen; Ilaria Piraino; Elisa Pala; Giulia Trovarelli; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-04

Review 3.  [Risk factors and management strategies for early and late infections following reconstruction with special tumour endoprostheses].

Authors:  V Janz; J Löchel; A Trampuz; K-D Schaser; A Hofer; G I Wassilew
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Implant and limb survival after resection of primary bone tumors of the lower extremities and reconstruction with mega-prostheses fifty patients followed for a mean of forteen years.

Authors:  Christina Enciso Holm; Christian Bardram; Anja Falk Riecke; Peter Horstmann; Michael Mørk Petersen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Surgical treatment of skeletal metastases in proximal tibia: a multicenter case series of 74 patients.

Authors:  Kaarel Kilk; Jessica Ehne; Jonathan D Stevenson; Gilber Kask; Jyrki Nieminen; Rikard Wedin; Michael C Parry; Minna K Laitinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Efficacy of different revision procedures for infected megaprostheses in musculoskeletal tumour surgery of the lower limb.

Authors:  Irene Katharina Sigmund; Jutta Gamper; Christine Weber; Johannes Holinka; Joannis Panotopoulos; Philipp Theodor Funovics; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Fighting Megaprosthetic Infections: What are the Chances of Winning?

Authors:  Manit K Gundavda; Ameya Katariya; Rajeev Reddy; Manish G Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 1.033

8.  Limb-salvage treatment of en-block resected distal femoral tumors with endoprosthesis of all-polyethylene tibial component: a 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Fan Tang; Yong Zhou; Li Min; Wenli Zhang; Rui Shi; Yi Luo; Hong Duan; Chongqi Tu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Modular cementless prosthetic reconstruction after resection of lower extremity malignant tumor.

Authors:  Senol Bekmez; Mehmet Ayvaz; Altug Yucekul; Mazhar Tokgozoglu
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 10.  Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection.

Authors:  Christoph Theil; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Niklas Deventer; Sebastian Klingebiel; George Grammatopoulos; Friedrich Boettner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.