PURPOSE: We aimed to characterise magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (mNPH) with radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. METHODS: Human prostate cancer subcutaneous tumours, PC3 and LAPC-4, were grown in nude male mice. When tumours measured 150 mm3 magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) were injected into tumours to a target dose of 5.5 mg Fe/cm3 tumour, and treated 24 h later by exposure to alternating magnetic field (AMF). Mice were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts to characterise (1) intratumour MIONP distribution, (2) effects of variable thermal dose mNPH (fixed AMF peak amplitude 24 kA/m at 160 ± 5 kHz) with/without RT (5 Gy), (3) effects of RT (RT5: 5 Gy; RT8: 8 Gy), and (4) fixed thermal dose mNPH (43 °C for 20 min) with/without RT (5 Gy). MIONP concentration and distribution were assessed following sacrifice and tissue harvest using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Prussian blue staining, respectively. Tumour growth was monitored and compared among treated groups. RESULTS: LAPC-4 tumours retained higher MIONP concentration and more uniform distribution than did PC3 tumours. AMF power modulation provided similar thermal dose for mNPH and combination therapy groups (CEM43: LAPC-4: 33.6 ± 3.4 versus 25.9 ± 0.8, and PC3: 27.19 ± 0.7 versus 27.50 ± 0.6), thereby overcoming limitations of MIONP distribution and yielding statistically significant tumour growth delay. CONCLUSION: PC3 and LAPC-4 tumours represent two biological models that demonstrate different patterns of nanoparticle retention and distribution, offering a model to make comparisons of these effects for mNPH. Modulating power for mNPH offers potential to overcome limitations of MIONP distribution to enhance mNPH.
PURPOSE: We aimed to characterise magnetic nanoparticle hyperthermia (mNPH) with radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer. METHODS:Human prostate cancer subcutaneous tumours, PC3 and LAPC-4, were grown in nude male mice. When tumours measured 150 mm3 magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (MIONPs) were injected into tumours to a target dose of 5.5 mg Fe/cm3 tumour, and treated 24 h later by exposure to alternating magnetic field (AMF). Mice were randomly assigned to one of four cohorts to characterise (1) intratumour MIONP distribution, (2) effects of variable thermal dose mNPH (fixed AMF peak amplitude 24 kA/m at 160 ± 5 kHz) with/without RT (5 Gy), (3) effects of RT (RT5: 5 Gy; RT8: 8 Gy), and (4) fixed thermal dose mNPH (43 °C for 20 min) with/without RT (5 Gy). MIONP concentration and distribution were assessed following sacrifice and tissue harvest using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and Prussian blue staining, respectively. Tumour growth was monitored and compared among treated groups. RESULTS:LAPC-4tumours retained higher MIONP concentration and more uniform distribution than did PC3 tumours. AMF power modulation provided similar thermal dose for mNPH and combination therapy groups (CEM43: LAPC-4: 33.6 ± 3.4 versus 25.9 ± 0.8, and PC3: 27.19 ± 0.7 versus 27.50 ± 0.6), thereby overcoming limitations of MIONP distribution and yielding statistically significant tumour growth delay. CONCLUSION:PC3 and LAPC-4tumours represent two biological models that demonstrate different patterns of nanoparticle retention and distribution, offering a model to make comparisons of these effects for mNPH. Modulating power for mNPH offers potential to overcome limitations of MIONP distribution to enhance mNPH.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hyperthermia; magnetic nanoparticles; prostate cancer; radiation therapy; radiosensitiser
Authors: Klaus Maier-Hauff; Ronny Rothe; Regina Scholz; Uwe Gneveckow; Peter Wust; Burghard Thiesen; Annelie Feussner; Andreas von Deimling; Norbert Waldoefner; Roland Felix; Andreas Jordan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Paul Moroz; Heath Pardoe; Stephen K Jones; Timothy G St Pierre; Swithin Song; Bruce N Gray Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2002-05-07 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Harley F Rodrigues; Francyelli M Mello; Luis C Branquinho; Nicholas Zufelato; Elisângela P Silveira-Lacerda; Andris F Bakuzis Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Frederik Soetaert; Preethi Korangath; David Serantes; Steven Fiering; Robert Ivkov Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Anilchandra Attaluri; John Jackowski; Anirudh Sharma; Sri Kamal Kandala; Valentin Nemkov; Chris Yakey; Theodore L DeWeese; Ananda Kumar; Robert C Goldstein; Robert Ivkov Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914
Authors: Paul R Stauffer; Dario B Rodrigues; Robert Goldstein; Thinh Nguyen; Yan Yu; Shuying Wan; Richard Woodward; Michael Gibbs; Ilya L Vasilchenko; Alexey M Osintsev; Voichita Bar-Ad; Dennis B Leeper; Wenyin Shi; Kevin D Judy; Mark D Hurwitz Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2020 Impact factor: 3.914