OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of thermotherapy using biocompatible superparamagnetic nanoparticles in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer and to evaluate an imaging-based approach for noninvasive calculations of the three-dimensional temperature distribution. METHODS: Ten patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary therapy with curative intent were entered into a prospective phase 1 trial. The magnetic fluid was injected transperineally into the prostates according to a preplan. Patients received six thermal therapies of 60-min duration at weekly intervals using an alternating magnetic field applicator. A method of three-dimensional thermal analysis based on computed tomography (CT) of the prostates was developed and correlated with invasive and intraluminal temperature measurements. The sensitivity of nanoparticle detection by means of CT was investigated in phantoms. RESULTS: The median detection rate of iron oxide nanoparticles in tissue specimens using CT was 89.5% (range: 70-98%). Maximum temperatures up to 55 degrees C were achieved in the prostates. Median temperatures in 20%, 50%, and 90% of the prostates were 41.1 degrees C (range: 40.0-47.4 degrees C), 40.8 degrees C (range: 39.5-45.4 degrees C), and 40.1 degrees C (range: 38.8-43.4 degrees C), respectively. Median urethral and rectal temperatures were 40.5 degrees C (range: 38.4-43.6 degrees C) and 39.8 degrees C (range: 38.2-43.4 degrees C). The median thermal dose was 7.8 (range: 3.5-136.4) cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C in 90% of the prostates. CONCLUSION: The heating technique using magnetic nanoparticles was feasible. Hyperthermic to thermoablative temperatures were achieved in the prostates at 25% of the available magnetic field strength, indicating a significant potential for higher temperatures. A noninvasive thermometry method specific for this approach could be developed, which may be used for thermal dosimetry in future studies.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of thermotherapy using biocompatible superparamagnetic nanoparticles in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer and to evaluate an imaging-based approach for noninvasive calculations of the three-dimensional temperature distribution. METHODS: Ten patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer following primary therapy with curative intent were entered into a prospective phase 1 trial. The magnetic fluid was injected transperineally into the prostates according to a preplan. Patients received six thermal therapies of 60-min duration at weekly intervals using an alternating magnetic field applicator. A method of three-dimensional thermal analysis based on computed tomography (CT) of the prostates was developed and correlated with invasive and intraluminal temperature measurements. The sensitivity of nanoparticle detection by means of CT was investigated in phantoms. RESULTS: The median detection rate of iron oxide nanoparticles in tissue specimens using CT was 89.5% (range: 70-98%). Maximum temperatures up to 55 degrees C were achieved in the prostates. Median temperatures in 20%, 50%, and 90% of the prostates were 41.1 degrees C (range: 40.0-47.4 degrees C), 40.8 degrees C (range: 39.5-45.4 degrees C), and 40.1 degrees C (range: 38.8-43.4 degrees C), respectively. Median urethral and rectal temperatures were 40.5 degrees C (range: 38.4-43.6 degrees C) and 39.8 degrees C (range: 38.2-43.4 degrees C). The median thermal dose was 7.8 (range: 3.5-136.4) cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 degrees C in 90% of the prostates. CONCLUSION: The heating technique using magnetic nanoparticles was feasible. Hyperthermic to thermoablative temperatures were achieved in the prostates at 25% of the available magnetic field strength, indicating a significant potential for higher temperatures. A noninvasive thermometry method specific for this approach could be developed, which may be used for thermal dosimetry in future studies.
Authors: Natalie L Adolphi; Kimberly S Butler; Debbie M Lovato; T E Tessier; Jason E Trujillo; Helen J Hathaway; Danielle L Fegan; Todd C Monson; Tyler E Stevens; Dale L Huber; Jaivijay Ramu; Michelle L Milne; Stephen A Altobelli; Howard C Bryant; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Frederik Soetaert; Preethi Korangath; David Serantes; Steven Fiering; Robert Ivkov Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev Date: 2020-06-27 Impact factor: 15.470
Authors: Daniel Baumgarten; Mario Liehr; Frank Wiekhorst; Uwe Steinhoff; Peter Münster; Peter Miethe; Lutz Trahms; Jens Haueisen Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2008-10-08 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Jonathan Leliaert; Arne Vansteenkiste; Annelies Coene; Luc Dupré; Bartel Van Waeyenberge Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Anilchandra Attaluri; Sri Kamal Kandala; Michele Wabler; Haoming Zhou; Christine Cornejo; Michael Armour; Mohammad Hedayati; Yonggang Zhang; Theodore L DeWeese; Cila Herman; Robert Ivkov Journal: Int J Hyperthermia Date: 2015-03-26 Impact factor: 3.914