Literature DB >> 25811641

Variability of Tear Osmolarity in Patients With Dry Eye.

Vatinee Y Bunya1, Nicole M Fuerst1, Maxwell Pistilli1, Bridgette E McCabe1, Rebecca Salvo1, Ilaria Macchi2, Gui-Shuang Ying1, Mina Massaro-Giordano1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Knowledge about the variability of measurements using the TearLab Osmolarity System is necessary when evaluating the clinical utility of readings.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the variability of tear osmolarity measured by the TearLab Osmolarity System in patients with Sjögren syndrome (SS), patients with blepharitis, and control participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study at a tertiary care academic center from June 13, 2012, to March 21, 2013. Participants included 74 eyes of 37 patients from a volunteer sample (18 patients with SS, 11 patients with blepharitis, and 8 control participants) who were evaluated using the TearLab Osmolarity System, with 3 consecutive osmolarity measurements taken at 1-minute intervals in a session; 15 of these patients had the same measurements taken by the same examiner in 2 additional sessions on the same day (9 AM-10 AM, 12 PM-1 PM, or 3 PM-4 PM). Most patients with SS and patients with blepharitis were taking systemic or topical dry eye medications at the time of enrollment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mean osmolarity and its variability calculated from a linear mixed model for each disease group that accounts for the variations attributable to different patients, eyes, and sessions and measurement error specific to each disease group.
RESULTS: Mean tear osmolarity was 307 mOsm/L, 304 mOsm/L, and 301 mOsm/L in the SS, blepharitis, and control groups, respectively (P = .46). The error associated with repeated measurements within a session in the patients without dry eye (10.5 mOsm/L [95% CI, 9.0-12.4]) was significantly lower than in the patients with blepharitis (14.6 mOsm/L [95% CI, 12.5-17.5]; P = .006) and patients with SS (15.8 mOsm/L [95% CI, 14.2-17.8]; P < .001) but a difference in the error of repeated measurements between patients with blepharitis and patients with SS was not identified (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: There was increased variability attributable to error in repeated measurements in patients with SS and patients with blepharitis compared with control participants. The high variability of TearLab osmolarity readings in all groups makes the clinical interpretation of measurements unclear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25811641      PMCID: PMC4466048          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  26 in total

1.  Diurnal variation of the tear osmolarity in normal subjects measured by a new microchip system.

Authors:  Banu Açikalin Oncel; Eylem Pinarci; Yonca A Akova
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.597

2.  Reproducibility and repeatability of the OcuSense TearLab™ osmometer.

Authors:  Frank Eperjesi; Maana Aujla; Hannah Bartlett
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for Sjögren's syndrome: a data-driven, expert consensus approach in the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance cohort.

Authors:  S C Shiboski; C H Shiboski; L A Criswell; A N Baer; S Challacombe; H Lanfranchi; M Schiødt; H Umehara; F Vivino; Y Zhao; Y Dong; D Greenspan; A M Heidenreich; P Helin; B Kirkham; K Kitagawa; G Larkin; M Li; T Lietman; J Lindegaard; N McNamara; K Sack; P Shirlaw; S Sugai; C Vollenweider; J Whitcher; A Wu; S Zhang; W Zhang; J S Greenspan; T E Daniels
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  Barriers to clinical uptake of tear osmolarity measurements.

Authors:  Santosh Khanal; Thomas J Millar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Clinical utility of objective tests for dry eye disease: variability over time and implications for clinical trials and disease management.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sullivan; Leslie A Crews; Barış Sönmez; Maria F de la Paz; Ebru Comert; Victor Charoenrook; Aline L de Araujo; Jay S Pepose; Michael S Berg; Valerie P Kosheleff; Michael A Lemp
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.651

6.  Tear osmolarity in the diagnosis and management of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Michael A Lemp; Anthony J Bron; Christophe Baudouin; José M Benítez Del Castillo; David Geffen; Joe Tauber; Gary N Foulks; Jay S Pepose; Benjamin D Sullivan
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Tear osmolarity measurements in dry eye related to primary Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Canan Asli Utine; Müge Bıçakçıgil; Sule Yavuz; Ferda Çiftçi
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.424

8.  An objective approach to dry eye disease severity.

Authors:  Benjamin D Sullivan; Diane Whitmer; Kelly K Nichols; Alan Tomlinson; Gary N Foulks; Gerd Geerling; Jay S Pepose; Valerie Kosheleff; Allison Porreco; Michael A Lemp
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  What is the value of incorporating tear osmolarity measurement in assessing patient response to therapy in dry eye disease?

Authors:  Francisco Amparo; Yiping Jin; Pedram Hamrah; Debra A Schaumberg; Reza Dana
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Evaluation of tear osmolarity in non-Sjögren and Sjögren syndrome dry eye patients with the TearLab system.

Authors:  Eszter Szalai; András Berta; Zoltán Szekanecz; Gabriella Szûcs; László Módis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.651

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  TFOS DEWS II Tear Film Report.

Authors:  Mark D P Willcox; Pablo Argüeso; Georgi A Georgiev; Juha M Holopainen; Gordon W Laurie; Tom J Millar; Eric B Papas; Jannick P Rolland; Tannin A Schmidt; Ulrike Stahl; Tatiana Suarez; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Omür Ö Uçakhan; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Assessments of tear meniscus height, tear film thickness, and corneal epithelial thickness after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

Authors:  Wen-Jia Xie; Ye-Sheng Xu; Xia Zhang; Yu-Feng Yao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Mar.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 3.  Understanding Neuropathic Corneal Pain--Gaps and Current Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Sunali Goyal; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.975

4.  Anti-inflammatory effects of paeoniflorin from Paeonia lactiflora Pall. on human corneal epithelial cells and a mouse model of dry eye disease.

Authors:  Mincong Zhao; Li Liu; Yating Zheng; Guangrong Liu; Biao Che; Penghui Li; Huixiong Chen; Changzhi Dong; Li Lin; Zhiyun Du
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.036

Review 5.  In pursuit of objective dry eye screening clinical techniques.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-18

6.  Paper-based microfluidic system for tear electrolyte analysis.

Authors:  Ali K Yetisen; Nan Jiang; Ali Tamayol; Guillermo U Ruiz-Esparza; Yu Shrike Zhang; Sofía Medina-Pando; Aditi Gupta; James S Wolffsohn; Haider Butt; Ali Khademhosseini; Seok-Hyun Yun
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 6.799

7.  Randomized comparison of in vivo performance of two point-of-care tear film osmometers.

Authors:  Jerry Nolfi; Barbara Caffery
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-22

Review 8.  The Growing Need for Validated Biomarkers and Endpoints for Dry Eye Clinical Research.

Authors:  Neeta S Roy; Yi Wei; Eric Kuklinski; Penny A Asbell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The relief of dry eye signs and symptoms using a combination of lubricants, lid hygiene and ocular nutraceuticals.

Authors:  William Ngo; Sruthi Srinivasan; Diane Houtman; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-07-12

Review 10.  Dry Eye Post-Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis: Major Review and Latest Updates.

Authors:  Eyal Cohen; Oriel Spierer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.