| Literature DB >> 25810947 |
S Mojtaba Mousavi1, Saeed Niazmand1, Mahmoud Hosseini2, Zarha Hassanzadeh2, Hamid Reza Sadeghnia3, Farzaneh Vafaee1, Zakieh Keshavarzi4.
Abstract
Objective. The effects of hydroalcoholic extract of Teucrium polium and metformin on diabetes-induced memory impairment and brain tissues oxidative damage were investigated. Methods. The rats were divided into: (1) Control, (2) Diabetic, (3) Diabetic-Extract 100 (Dia-Ext 100), (4) Diabetic-Extract 200 (Dia-Ext 200), (5) Diabetic-Extract 400 (Dia-Ext 400), and (6) Diabetic-Metformin (Dia-Met). Groups 3-6 were treated by 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg of the extract or metformin, respectively, for 6 weeks (orally). Results. In passive avoidance test, the latency to enter the dark compartment in Diabetic group was lower than that of Control group (P < 0.01). In Dia-Ext 100, Dia-Ext 200, and Dia-Ext 400 and Metformin groups, the latencies were higher than those of Diabetic group (P < 0.01). Lipid peroxides levels (reported as malondialdehyde, MDA, concentration) in the brain of Diabetic group were higher than Control (P < 0.001). Treatment by all doses of the extract and metformin decreased the MDA concentration (P < 0.01). Conclusions. The results of present study showed that metformin and the hydroalcoholic extract of Teucrium polium prevent diabetes-induced memory deficits in rats. Protection against brain tissues oxidative damage might have a role in the beneficial effects of the extract and metformin.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25810947 PMCID: PMC4354963 DOI: 10.1155/2015/493729
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Alzheimers Dis
Figure 1Comparison of time latency for entering the dark compartment before and at 1 and 24 h after receiving the shock in the experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group). ** P < 0.01 in comparison with Control group and ++ P < 0.01 and +++ P < 0.001 in comparison with Diabetic group.
Figure 2Comparison of the total time spent in the dark compartment before and at 1 and 24 h after receiving the shock in the experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group). * P < 0.05 in comparison with Control group and + P < 0.05 and ++ P < 0.01 in comparison with Diabetic group.
Figure 3Comparison of the total time spent in the light compartment before and at 1 and 24 h after receiving the shock in the experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10 in each group). * P < 0.05 in comparison with Control group and + P < 0.05 in comparison with Diabetic group.
Figure 4The MDA concentrations (a) and total thiol concentrations (b) in hippocampal tissues of 6 groups. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of 10 animals per group. * P < 0.05 and *** P < 0.001 in comparison with Control group and ++ P < 0.01 and +++ P < 0.001 in comparison with Diabetic group.
Figure 5The MDA concentrations (a) and total thiol concentrations (b) in cortical tissues of 6 groups. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of 10 animals per group. *** P < 0.001 in comparison with Control group and ++ P < 0.01 and +++ P < 0.001 in comparison with Diabetic group.
Figure 6The blood glucose concentrations of 6 groups. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of 10 animals per group. ** P < 0.01 in comparison with Control group.