Literature DB >> 25810093

Parental age affects somatic mutation rates in the progeny of flowering plants.

Amit Kumar Singh1, Tufail Bashir1, Christian Sailer1, Viswanathan Gurumoorthy1, Anantha Maharasi Ramakrishnan1, Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal1, Ueli Grossniklaus1, Ramamurthy Baskar2.   

Abstract

In humans, it is well known that the parental reproductive age has a strong influence on mutations transmitted to their progeny. Meiotic nondisjunction is known to increase in older mothers, and base substitutions tend to go up with paternal reproductive age. Hence, it is clear that the germinal mutation rates are a function of both maternal and paternal ages in humans. In contrast, it is unknown whether the parental reproductive age has an effect on somatic mutation rates in the progeny, because these are rare and difficult to detect. To address this question, we took advantage of the plant model system Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), where mutation detector lines allow for an easy quantitation of somatic mutations, to test the effect of parental age on somatic mutation rates in the progeny. Although we found no significant effect of parental age on base substitutions, we found that frameshift mutations and transposition events increased in the progeny of older parents, an effect that is stronger through the maternal line. In contrast, intrachromosomal recombination events in the progeny decrease with the age of the parents in a parent-of-origin-dependent manner. Our results clearly show that parental reproductive age affects somatic mutation rates in the progeny and, thus, that some form of age-dependent information, which affects the frequency of double-strand breaks and possibly other processes involved in maintaining genome integrity, is transmitted through the gametes.
© 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25810093      PMCID: PMC4424033          DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.00291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  55 in total

1.  Relationship between Endopolyploidy and Cell Size in Epidermal Tissue of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J. E. Melaragno; B. Mehrotra; A. W. Coleman
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Male-line transgenerational responses in humans.

Authors:  Marcus E Pembrey
Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry.

Authors:  Jaroslav Dolezel; Johann Greilhuber; Jan Suda
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Epigenetics and the origins of paternal effects.

Authors:  James P Curley; Rahia Mashoodh; Frances A Champagne
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.587

5.  Genome-wide variation of the somatic mutation frequency in transgenic plants.

Authors:  I Kovalchuk; O Kovalchuk; B Hohn
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Deoxyribonucleic Acid-dependent Ribonucleic Acid Polymerase Activity of Nuclei and Plastids from Etiolated Peas and their Response to Red and Far Red Light in Vivo.

Authors:  W Bottomley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Effects of age on DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in human sperm.

Authors:  Narendra P Singh; Charles H Muller; Richard E Berger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Development and application of novel constructs to score C:G-to-T:A transitions and homologous recombination in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Gert Van der Auwera; Joke Baute; Melanie Bauwens; Ingrid Peck; Denis Piette; Michael Pycke; Pieter Asselman; Anna Depicker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Age-dependent somatic excision of transposable element Tc1 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  N K Egilmez; R J Shmookler Reis
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  Transgenerational stress memory is not a general response in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ales Pecinka; Marisa Rosa; Adam Schikora; Marc Berlinger; Heribert Hirt; Christian Luschnig; Ortrun Mittelsten Scheid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Brief temperature stress during reproductive stages alters meiotic recombination and somatic mutation rates in the progeny of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Ramswaroop Saini; Amit Kumar Singh; Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal; Thoufeequl Hakeem Saeed; Geoffrey J Hyde; Ramamurthy Baskar
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.215

2.  Levels of Heterochiasmy During Arabidopsis Development as Reported by Fluorescent Tagged Lines.

Authors:  Ramswaroop Saini; Amit Kumar Singh; Geoffrey J Hyde; Ramamurthy Baskar
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Suppression of different classes of somatic mutations in Arabidopsis by vir gene-expressing Agrobacterium strains.

Authors:  Jasmine M Shah; Anantha Maharasi Ramakrishnan; Amit Kumar Singh; Subalakshmi Ramachandran; Unnikrishnan Unniyampurath; Ajitha Jayshankar; Nithya Balasundaram; Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal; Geoff Hyde; Ramamurthy Baskar
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.215

4.  CSN5A Subunit of COP9 Signalosome Temporally Buffers Response to Heat in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Singh; Brijesh Singh Yadav; Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal; Mark Berliner; Alin Finkelshtein; Daniel A Chamovitz
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2019-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.