Literature DB >> 25806675

Use and Safety of Erythromycin and Metoclopramide in Hospitalized Infants.

Jessica E Ericson1, Christopher Arnold, Jomani Cheeseman, Jordan Cho, Sarah Kaneko, Ele'na Wilson, Reese H Clark, Daniel K Benjamin, Vivian Chu, P Brian Smith, Christoph P Hornik.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prokinetic medications are used in premature infants to promote motility and decrease time to full enteral feeding. Erythromycin and metoclopramide are the most commonly used prokinetic medications in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), but their safety profile is not well defined.
METHODS: We conducted a large retrospective cohort study using data from 348 NICUs managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group. All of the infants exposed to ≥1 dose of erythromycin, metoclopramide, or both, from a cohort of 8,87,910 infants discharged between 1997 and 2012 were included. We collected laboratory and clinical information while infants were exposed to erythromycin or metoclopramide and described the frequency of laboratory abnormalities and clinical adverse events (AEs).
RESULTS: Metoclopramide use increased from 1997 to 2005 and decreased from 2005 to 2012, whereas erythromycin use remained stable. Erythromycin use was most often associated with a diagnosis of feeding problem (40%), whereas metoclopramide was most often associated with a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux (59%). The most common laboratory AE during exposure to erythromycin or metoclopramide was hyperkalemia (8.6/1000 infant days on erythromycin and 11.0/1000 infant days on metoclopramide). Incidence of pyloric stenosis was greater with erythromycin than with metoclopramide (10/1095, 0.9% vs 76/19,001, 0.4%; P = 0.01), but odds were not significantly increased after adjusting for covariates (odds ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-1.02, P = 0.06). More infants experienced an AE while treated with metoclopramide than with erythromycin (odds ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.43).
CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide was associated with increased risk of AEs compared with erythromycin. Studies are needed to confirm safety and effectiveness of both the drugs in infants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25806675      PMCID: PMC4553109          DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   3.288


  37 in total

Review 1.  A quality improvement approach to optimizing medication use in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Dan L Ellsbury; Robert Ursprung
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  The Pediatrix BabySteps Data Warehouse and the Pediatrix QualitySteps improvement project system--tools for "meaningful use" in continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  Alan R Spitzer; Dan L Ellsbury; Darren Handler; Reese H Clark
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.430

3.  Patience is a virtue in the management of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Reese H Clark; Alan R Spitzer
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.406

4.  Randomized controlled trial of a high dose of oral erythromycin for the treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants.

Authors:  Yasmeen Mansi; Nabil Abdelaziz; Zahraa Ezzeldin; Rania Ibrahim
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Efficacy of prophylactic oral erythromycin to improve enteral feeding tolerance in preterm infants: a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M Mohammadizadeh; M Ghazinour; R Iranpour
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Efficacy of oral erythromycin for treatment of feeding intolerance in preterm infants.

Authors:  Pracha Nuntnarumit; Pakaphan Kiatchoosakun; Wacharee Tantiprapa; Suppawat Boonkasidecha
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  A controlled trial of erythromycin and UDCA in premature infants during parenteral nutrition in minimizing feeding intolerance and liver function abnormalities.

Authors:  T Gokmen; S S Oguz; S Bozdag; O Erdeve; N Uras; U Dilmen
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Can prophylactic oral erythromycin reduce time to full enteral feeds in preterm neonates?

Authors:  S K Patole; R Almonte; R Kadalraja; R Tuladhar; R Muller; J S Whitehall
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).

Authors:  Yvan Vandenplas; Colin D Rudolph; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Eric Hassall; Gregory Liptak; Lynnette Mazur; Judith Sondheimer; Annamaria Staiano; Michael Thomson; Gigi Veereman-Wauters; Tobias G Wenzl
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  High-dose oral erythromycin decreased the incidence of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis in preterm infants.

Authors:  Pak C Ng; Cheuk H Lee; Samuel P S Wong; Hugh S Lam; Flora Y B Liu; King W So; Cheuk Y Lee; Tai F Fok
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  8 in total

1.  Azithromycin Induces Migrating Motor Complexes in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Antroduodenal Motility Studies.

Authors:  Asiya K Shakir; Muhammad Adnan Altaf
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

2.  Association between neonatal intensive care unit medication safety practices, adverse events, and death.

Authors:  Laura E Miller; Chris DeRienzo; P Brian Smith; Carl Bose; Reese H Clark; C Michael Cotten; Daniel K Benjamin; Chi D Hornik; Rachel G Greenberg
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Association between exposure to macrolides and the development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed Abdellatif; Sherief Ghozy; Mohamed Gomaa Kamel; Sameh Samir Elawady; Mohamed Mohy Eldeen Ghorab; Andrew Wassef Attia; Truong Thi Le Huyen; Diep Trong Vien Duy; Kenji Hirayama; Nguyen Tien Huy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Management of Enteral Nutrition in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Prokinetic Effects of Amoxicillin/Clavulanate in Real Life Conditions.

Authors:  Fabrizio Chiusolo; Teresa Capriati; Ilaria Erba; Roberto Bianchi; Marta Luisa Ciofi Degli Atti; Sergio Picardo; Antonella Diamanti
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2020-11-05

5.  Safety of histamine-2 receptor blockers in hospitalized VLBW infants.

Authors:  Andrew Romaine; Daniel Ye; Zachary Ao; Francia Fang; Octavious Johnson; Taylor Blake; Daniel K Benjamin; C Michael Cotten; Daniela Testoni; Reese H Clark; Vivian H Chu; P Brian Smith; Christoph P Hornik
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 2.699

6.  The association of prenatal and postnatal macrolide exposure with subsequent development of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hamdi H Almaramhy; Abdulmohsen H Al-Zalabani
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.638

7.  Impact of Probiotic B. infantis EVC001 Feeding in Premature Infants on the Gut Microbiome, Nosocomially Acquired Antibiotic Resistance, and Enteric Inflammation.

Authors:  Marielle Nguyen; Heaven Holdbrooks; Prasanthi Mishra; Maria A Abrantes; Sherri Eskew; Mariajamiela Garma; Cyr-Geraurd Oca; Carrie McGuckin; Cynthia B Hein; Ryan D Mitchell; Sufyan Kazi; Stephanie Chew; Giorgio Casaburi; Heather K Brown; Steven A Frese; Bethany M Henrick
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 8.  Post-natal erythromycin exposure and risk of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Murchison; P De Coppi; S Eaton
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.