BACKGROUND: Liposomal amphotericin B is locally delivered to treat fungal orthopaedic infections but little is known about local tissue toxicity, if any, that might be associated with local delivery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is liposomal amphotericin B cytotoxic in vitro? (2) Is locally delivered liposomal amphotericin B toxic to tissue in vivo? METHODS: Mouse fibroblasts (BA LB/3T3 A31) and osteoblasts (MC3T3) were exposed to two formulations of amphotericin B (liposomal and deoxycholate) at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg/mL. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay after 1, 3, and 5 hours of exposure and a proliferation assay after 1, 4, and 7 days of exposure and then after 3 recovery days without drug. Tissue exposure occurred by local delivery of liposomal amphotericin B, 200 or 800 mg/batch antifungal-loaded bone cement (ALBC), or amphotericin B deoxycholate, 800 mg/batch ALBC in rat paraspinal muscles. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum amphotericin B levels were obtained on Days 1 and 3. Rats were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks and semiqualitative histopathology was performed. RESULTS: Liposomal amphotericin B is cytotoxic in vitro but not toxic to tissues in vivo. All cells survived concentrations up to 1000 μg/mL for 5 hours, 100% ± 0%, but none survived ≥ 100 μg/mL for 7 days, 0% ± 0%. Fibrosis was seen adjacent to ALBC without inflammation or necrosis, indistinguishable from controls for both liposomal amphotericin B doses. Amphotericin B serum levels were all less than 1 µg/mL and WBC counts were all normal. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro cytotoxicity to liposomal amphotericin B occurred but no adverse tissue reaction was seen in vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local delivery of liposomal amphotericin B in ALBC was well tolerated by mouse tissue; however, clinical studies are needed to confirm this finding in humans.
BACKGROUND: Liposomal amphotericin B is locally delivered to treat fungal orthopaedic infections but little is known about local tissue toxicity, if any, that might be associated with local delivery. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is liposomal amphotericin B cytotoxic in vitro? (2) Is locally delivered liposomal amphotericin B toxic to tissue in vivo? METHODS:Mouse fibroblasts (BA LB/3T3 A31) and osteoblasts (MC3T3) were exposed to two formulations of amphotericin B (liposomal and deoxycholate) at concentrations of 0, 1, 5, 10, 100, 500, and 1000 μg/mL. Cell viability was determined by MTT assay after 1, 3, and 5 hours of exposure and a proliferation assay after 1, 4, and 7 days of exposure and then after 3 recovery days without drug. Tissue exposure occurred by local delivery of liposomal amphotericin B, 200 or 800 mg/batch antifungal-loaded bone cement (ALBC), or amphotericin Bdeoxycholate, 800 mg/batch ALBC in rat paraspinal muscles. White blood cell count (WBC) and serum amphotericin B levels were obtained on Days 1 and 3. Rats were euthanized at 2 and 4 weeks and semiqualitative histopathology was performed. RESULTS: Liposomal amphotericin B is cytotoxic in vitro but not toxic to tissues in vivo. All cells survived concentrations up to 1000 μg/mL for 5 hours, 100% ± 0%, but none survived ≥ 100 μg/mL for 7 days, 0% ± 0%. Fibrosis was seen adjacent to ALBC without inflammation or necrosis, indistinguishable from controls for both liposomal amphotericin B doses. Amphotericin B serum levels were all less than 1 µg/mL and WBC counts were all normal. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro cytotoxicity to liposomal amphotericin B occurred but no adverse tissue reaction was seen in vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Local delivery of liposomal amphotericin B in ALBC was well tolerated by mouse tissue; however, clinical studies are needed to confirm this finding in humans.
Authors: Ryan B Miller; Alex C McLaren; Christine Pauken; Henry D Clarke; Ryan McLemore Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Ihor Bekersky; Robert M Fielding; Dawna E Dressler; Jean W Lee; Donald N Buell; Thomas J Walsh Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Abiodun D Ogunniyi; Manouchehr Khazandi; Andrew J Stevens; Sarah K Sims; Stephen W Page; Sanjay Garg; Henrietta Venter; Andrew Powell; Karen White; Kiro R Petrovski; Geraldine Laven-Law; Eliane G Tótoli; Hérida R Salgado; Hongfei Pi; Geoffrey W Coombs; Dean L Shinabarger; John D Turnidge; James C Paton; Adam McCluskey; Darren J Trott Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kaila P Medina-Alarcón; Junya L Singulani; Aline R Voltan; Janaina C O Sardi; Maicon S Petrônio; Mariana B Santos; Carlos R Polaquini; Luis O Regasini; Vanderlan S Bolzani; Dulce H S da Silva; Marlus Chorilli; Maria J S Mendes-Giannini; Ana M Fusco-Almeida Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 5.640