Literature DB >> 22467417

Liposomal formulation increases local delivery of amphotericin from bone cement: a pilot study.

Brian Cunningham1, Alex C McLaren, Christine Pauken, Ryan McLemore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amphotericin is a highly toxic hydrophobic antifungal. Delivery of amphotericin from antifungal-loaded bone cement (ALBC) is much lower than would be expected for an equivalent load of water-soluble antibacterials. Lipid formulations have been developed to decrease amphotericin toxicity. It is unknown how lipid formulations affect amphotericin release and compressive strength of amphotericin ALBC. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked if amphotericin release from liposomal amphotericin ALBC (1) changed with amphotericin load; (2) differed from release from amphotericin deoxycholate ALBC; (3) was an active drug; and (4) if liposomal amphotericin affected the bone cement strength.
METHODS: Forty-five standardized test cylinders were fabricated from three formulations of ALBC: Simplex™ P bone cement with 200 mg liposomal amphotericin, 800 mg liposomal amphotericin, or 800 mg amphotericin deoxycholate per batch. For each ALBC formulation, cumulative released amphotericin was determined from five cylinders, and compressive strength was measured for 10 cylinders, five before elution and five after. Activity of released amphotericin was determined by growth inhibition assay.
RESULTS: Amphotericin release was greater for increased load of liposomal amphotericin: 770 μg for 800 mg versus 118 μg for 200 mg. Amphotericin release was greater from liposomal ALBC than from deoxycholate ALBC: 770 μg versus 23 μg over 7 days for 800 mg amphotericin. Released amphotericin was active. Compressive strength of liposomal ALBC is decreased, 67 MPa and 34 MPa by Day 7 in elution for the 200-mg and 800-mg formulations, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal amphotericin has greater amphotericin release from ALBC than amphotericin deoxycholate. Compressive strength of liposomal amphotericin ALBC decreases to less than recommended for implant fixation. Local toxicity data are needed before liposomal amphotericin ALBC can be used clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467417      PMCID: PMC3442012          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2317-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  9 in total

1.  Amphotericin B-loaded bone cement to treat osteomyelitis caused by Candida albicans.

Authors:  F Marra; G M Robbins; B A Masri; C Duncan; K M Wasan; E H Kwong; P J Jewesson
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Amphotericin B delivery from bone cement increases with porosity but strength decreases.

Authors:  Chris Kweon; Alex C McLaren; Christine Leon; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effect of surfactants on the aggregation state of amphotericin B.

Authors:  P Tancrède; J Barwicz; S Jutras; I Gruda
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1990-12-14

4.  Amphotericin B is cytotoxic at locally delivered concentrations.

Authors:  Samuel Harmsen; Alex C McLaren; Christine Pauken; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of amphotericin B serum concentrations after the administration of AmBisome, a liposomal amphotericin B formulation.

Authors:  A Alak; S Moy; I Bekersky
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Hepatobiliary disposition of liposomal amphotericin B in the isolated perfused rat liver.

Authors:  Ying Hong; Iqbal Ramzan; Andrew J McLachlan
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Pharmacology, toxicity, and therapeutic usefulness of amphotericin B.

Authors:  W T Butler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1966-01-31       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Elution and mechanical properties of antifungal bone cement.

Authors:  Ben Goss; Carmen Lutton; Patrick Weinrauch; Majid Jabur; Greg Gillett; Ross Crawford
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Delivery of antifungal agents using bioactive and nonbioactive bone cements.

Authors:  Patricia I Sealy; Cam Nguyen; Michelle Tucci; Ham Benghuzzi; John D Cleary
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.154

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Amphotericin B-impregnated bone cement to treat refractory coccidioidal osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Zhu; George R Thompson; Christopher Kreulen; Eric Giza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Liposomal Formulation Decreases Toxicity of Amphotericin B In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Justin Roberts; Josh Bingham; Alex C McLaren; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Voriconazole is delivered from antifungal-loaded bone cement.

Authors:  Ryan B Miller; Alex C McLaren; Christine Pauken; Henry D Clarke; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A daptomycin-xylitol-loaded polymethylmethacrylate bone cement: how much xylitol should be used?

Authors:  Ali Salehi; Ashley Cox Parker; Gladius Lewis; Harry S Courtney; Warren O Haggard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Antimicrobial distribution from local delivery depends on dose : a pilot study with MRI.

Authors:  Alex McLaren; Morgan B Giers; James Fraser; Luke Hosack; Michael R Caplan; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Adjuvant antibiotic-loaded bone cement: Concerns with current use and research to make it work.

Authors:  Edward M Schwarz; Alex C McLaren; Thomas P Sculco; Barry Brause; Mathias Bostrom; Stephen L Kates; Javad Parvizi; Volker Alt; William V Arnold; Alberto Carli; Antonia F Chen; Hyonmin Choe; Débora C Coraça-Huber; Michael Cross; Michelle Ghert; Noreen Hickok; Jessica Amber Jennings; Manjari Joshi; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Mark Ninomiya; Kohei Nishitani; Irvin Oh; Douglas Padgett; Benjamin Ricciardi; Kordo Saeed; Parham Sendi; Bryan Springer; Paul Stoodley; Joseph C Wenke
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.102

7.  Management of Resistant, Atypical and Culture-negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander S McLawhorn; Danyal H Nawabi; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-11-30

8.  Candida Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Is It Curable?

Authors:  Laura Escolà-Vergé; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; Pablo S Corona; Carles Pigrau
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-17

9.  A novel liposomal drug delivery system for PMMA bone cements.

Authors:  Wayne Nishio Ayre; James C Birchall; Samuel L Evans; Stephen P Denyer
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.368

10.  Fungal Periprosthetic Knee Joint Infection in a Patient with Metamizole-Induced Agranulocytosis.

Authors:  Sebastian Oenning; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Georg Gosheger; Tom Schmidt-Bräkling; Jan Schwarze; Thomas Ackmann; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Christoph Theil
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.