Literature DB >> 11850268

Pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate in humans.

Ihor Bekersky1, Robert M Fielding, Dawna E Dressler, Jean W Lee, Donald N Buell, Thomas J Walsh.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics, excretion, and mass balance of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) (liposomal AMB) and the conventional formulation, AMB deoxycholate (AMB-DOC), were compared in a phase IV, open-label, parallel study in healthy volunteers. After a single 2-h infusion of 2 mg of liposomal AMB/kg of body weight or 0.6 mg of AMB-DOC/kg, plasma, urine, and feces were collected for 168 h. The concentrations of AMB were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (plasma, urine, feces) or high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (plasma). Infusion-related side effects similar to those reported in patients, including nausea and back pain, were observed in both groups. Both formulations had triphasic plasma profiles with long terminal half-lives (liposomal AMB, 152 +/- 116 h; AMB-DOC, 127 +/- 30 h), but plasma concentrations were higher (P < 0.01) after administration of liposomal AMB (maximum concentration of drug in serum [C(max)], 22.9 +/- 10 microg/ml) than those of AMB-DOC (Cmax, 1.4 +/- 0.2 microg/ml). Liposomal AMB had a central compartment volume close to that of plasma (50 +/- 19 ml/kg) and a volume of distribution at steady state (Vss) (774 +/- 550 ml/kg) smaller than the Vss of AMB-DOC (1,807 +/- 239 ml/kg) (P < 0.01). Total clearances were similar (approximately 10 ml hr(-1) kg(-1)), but renal and fecal clearances of liposomal AMB were 10-fold lower than those of AMB-DOC (P < 0.01). Two-thirds of the AMB-DOC was excreted unchanged in the urine (20.6%) and feces (42.5%) with >90% accounted for in mass balance calculations at 1 week, suggesting that metabolism plays at most a minor role in AMB elimination. In contrast, <10% of the liposomal AMB was excreted unchanged. No metabolites were observed by HPLC or mass spectrometry. In comparison to AMB-DOC, liposomal AMB produced higher plasma exposures and lower volumes of distribution and markedly decreased the excretion of unchanged drug in urine and feces. Thus, liposomal AMB significantly alters the excretion and mass balance of AMB. The ability of liposomes to sequester drugs in circulating liposomes and within deep tissue compartments may account for these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11850268      PMCID: PMC127462          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.46.3.828-833.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  30 in total

1.  Relationship of pharmacokinetically-calculated volumes of distribution to the physiologic distribution of liposomal drugs in tissues: implications for the characterization of liposomal formulations.

Authors:  R M Fielding
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Toxicological profile and pharmacokinetics of a unilamellar liposomal vesicle formulation of amphotericin B in rats.

Authors:  G W Boswell; I Bekersky; D Buell; R Hiles; T J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Biodistribution of 4-[(14)C]cholesterol-AmBisome following a single intravenous administration to rats.

Authors:  R W Townsend; A Zutshi; I Bekersky
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.922

4.  A high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of amphotericin B serum concentrations after the administration of AmBisome, a liposomal amphotericin B formulation.

Authors:  A Alak; S Moy; I Bekersky
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.681

5.  Lipid-based amphotericin B formulations: from animals to man.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pharm Sci Technolo Today       Date:  1999-06

6.  Quantitation of free and total amphotericin B in human biologic matrices by a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric method.

Authors:  J W Lee; M E Petersen; P Lin; D Dressler; I Bekersky
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group.

Authors:  T J Walsh; R W Finberg; C Arndt; J Hiemenz; C Schwartz; D Bodensteiner; P Pappas; N Seibel; R N Greenberg; S Dummer; M Schuster; J S Holcenberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Relationship of pharmacokinetics and drug distribution in tissue to increased safety of amphotericin B colloidal dispersion in dogs.

Authors:  R M Fielding; A W Singer; L H Wang; S Babbar; L S Guo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparative safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B desoxycholate in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  V L Kan; J E Bennett; M A Amantea; M C Smolskis; E McManus; D M Grasela; J W Sherman
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  High-performance liquid chromatographic analysis of amphotericin B in plasma, blood, urine and tissues for pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies.

Authors:  L H Wang; P C Smith; K L Anderson; R M Fielding
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1992-09-02
View more
  82 in total

1.  Optimization of liposomal indocyanine green for imaging of the urinary pathways and a proof of concept in a pig model.

Authors:  Yael Friedman-Levi; Liraz Larush; Michele Diana; Francesco Marchegiani; Jacques Marescaux; Noam Goder; Guy Lahat; Joseph Klausner; Sara Eyal; Shlomo Magdassi; Eran Nizri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative drug disposition, urinary pharmacokinetics, and renal effects of multilamellar liposomal nystatin and amphotericin B deoxycholate in rabbits.

Authors:  Andreas H Groll; Diana Mickiene; Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Raul M Alfaro; Christine King; Stephen C Piscitelli; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Antifungal agents: in vitro susceptibility testing, pharmacodynamics, and prospects for combination therapy.

Authors:  A H Groll; H Kolve
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Factors influencing the use and interpretation of animal models in the development of parenteral drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Biodistribution and In Vivo Antileishmanial Activity of 1,2-Distigmasterylhemisuccinoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphocholine Liposome-Intercalated Amphotericin B.

Authors:  Maryam Iman; Zhaohua Huang; Seyedeh Hoda Alavizadeh; Francis C Szoka; Mahmoud R Jaafari
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Pharmacodynamic effects of simulated standard doses of antifungal drugs against Aspergillus species in a new in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Joseph Meletiadis; Rafal Al-Saigh; Aristea Velegraki; Thomas J Walsh; Emmanuel Roilides; Loukia Zerva
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Voriconazole-induced inhibition of the fungicidal activity of amphotericin B in Candida strains with reduced susceptibility to voriconazole: an effect not predicted by the MIC value alone.

Authors:  Anders Lignell; Elisabeth Löwdin; Otto Cars; Dominique Sanglard; Jan Sjölin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models.

Authors:  D Andes; N Safdar; K Marchillo; R Conklin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics and dose-response relationships of liposomal amphotericin B against different azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.

Authors:  Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Willem J G Melchers; Johan W Mouton; Paul E Verweij
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Reformulation of Fungizone by PEG-DSPE Micelles: Deaggregation and Detoxification of Amphotericin B.

Authors:  Celeste Alvarez; Dae Hwan Shin; Glen S Kwon
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.