Literature DB >> 25804431

Computerized training system for ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture on abnormal spine models: a randomized controlled trial.

Zsuzsanna Keri1, Devin Sydor, Tamas Ungi, Matthew S Holden, Robert McGraw, Parvin Mousavi, Daniel P Borschneck, Gabor Fichtinger, Melanie Jaeger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A randomized controlled trial was carried out to determine whether Perk Tutor, a computerized training platform that displays an ultrasound image and real-time needle position in a three-dimensional (3D) anatomical model, would benefit residents learning ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture (LP) in simulation phantoms with abnormal spinal anatomy.
METHODS: Twenty-four residents were randomly assigned to either the Perk Tutor (P) or the Control (C) group and asked to perform an LP with ultrasound guidance on part-task trainers with spinal pathology. Group P was trained with the 3D display along with conventional ultrasound imaging, while Group C used conventional ultrasound only. Both groups were then tested solely with conventional ultrasound guidance on an abnormal spinal model not previously seen. We measured potential tissue damage, needle path in tissue, total procedure time, and needle insertion time. Procedural success rate was a secondary outcome.
RESULTS: The needle tracking measurements (expressed as median [interquartile range; IQR]) in Group P vs Group C revealed less potential tissue damage (39.7 [21.3-42.7] cm(2) vs 128.3 [50.3-208.2] cm(2), respectively; difference 88.6; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 24.8 to 193.5; P = 0.01), a shorter needle path inside the tissue (426.0 [164.9-571.6] mm vs 629.7 [306.4-2,879.1] mm, respectively; difference 223.7; 95% CI 76.3 to 1,859.9; P = 0.02), and lower needle insertion time (30.3 [14.0-51.0] sec vs 59.1 [26.0-136.2] sec, respectively; difference 28.8; 95% CI 2.2 to 134.0; P = 0.05). Total procedure time and overall success rates between groups did not differ.
CONCLUSION: Residents trained with augmented reality 3D visualization had better performance metrics on ultrasound-guided LP in pathological spine models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25804431     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0367-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  12 in total

1.  Recommendations on the Use of Ultrasound Guidance for Adult Lumbar Puncture: A Position Statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Authors:  Nilam J Soni; Ricardo Franco-Sadud; Ketino Kobaidze; Daniel Schnobrich; Gerard Salame; Joshua Lenchus; Venkat Kalidindi; Michael J Mader; Elizabeth K Haro; Ria Dancel; Joel Cho; Loretta Grikis; Brian P Lucas
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 2.960

Review 2.  Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training.

Authors:  E Z Barsom; M Graafland; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Stepwise development of a simulation environment for operating room teams: the example of vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Pfandler; Philipp Stefan; Patrick Wucherer; Marc Lazarovici; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2018-09-26

Review 4.  Application and evaluation of virtual technologies for anatomy education to medical students: A review.

Authors:  Zahra Karbasi; Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Virtual reality in spinal endoscopy: a paradigm shift in education to support spine surgeons.

Authors:  Ryan Lohre; Jeffrey C Wang; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Danny P Goel
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

6.  Exploratory Application of Augmented Reality/Mixed Reality Devices for Acute Care Procedure Training.

Authors:  Leo Kobayashi; Xiao Chi Zhang; Scott A Collins; Naz Karim; Derek L Merck
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-12-14

7.  Ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture with a needle-guidance system: A prospective and controlled study to evaluate the learnability and feasibility of a newly developed approach.

Authors:  Tilo Backhaus; Moritz von Cranach; Jochen Brich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feasibility of the Epiduroscopy Simulator as a Training Tool: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Junho Ko; Yeomin Yun; Seong-Wook Jang; Yoon Ha; Yoon Sang Kim; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  The Applications of Virtual Reality Technology in Medical Groups Teaching.

Authors:  Mahnaz Samadbeik; Donya Yaaghobi; Peivand Bastani; Shahabeddin Abhari; Rita Rezaee; Ali Garavand
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-07

10.  Augmented reality and mixed reality for healthcare education beyond surgery: an integrative review.

Authors:  Jaris Gerup; Camilla B Soerensen; Peter Dieckmann
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.