| Literature DB >> 25803295 |
Sascha Knauf1, Franziska Dahlmann1, Emmanuel K Batamuzi2, Sieghard Frischmann3, Hsi Liu4.
Abstract
There is evidence to suggest that the yaws bacterium (Treponema pallidum ssp. pertenue) may exist in non-human primate populations residing in regions where yaws is endemic in humans. Especially in light of the fact that the World Health Organizaiton (WHO) recently launched its second yaws eradication campaign, there is a considerable need for reliable tools to identify treponemal infection in our closest relatives, African monkeys and great apes. It was hypothesized that commercially available serological tests detect simian anti-T. pallidum antibody in serum samples of baboons, with comparable sensitivity and specificity to their results on human sera. Test performances of five different treponemal tests (TTs) and two non-treponemal tests (NTTs) were evaluated using serum samples of 57 naturally T. pallidum-infected olive baboons (Papio anubis) from Lake Manyara National Park in Tanzania. The T. pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) was used as a gold standard for comparison. In addition, the overall infection status of the animals was used to further validate test performances. For most accurate results, only samples that originated from baboons of known infection status, as verified in a previous study by clinical inspection, PCR and immunohistochemistry, were included. All tests, TTs and NTTs, used in this study were able to reliably detect antibodies against T. pallidum in serum samples of infected baboons. The sensitivity of TTs ranged from 97.7-100%, while specificity was between 88.0-100.0%. The two NTTs detected anti-lipoidal antibodies in serum samples of infected baboons with a sensitivity of 83.3% whereas specificity was 100%. For screening purposes, the TT Espline TP provided the highest sensitivity and specificity and at the same time provided the most suitable format for use in the field. The enzyme immune assay Mastblot TP (IgG), however, could be considered as a confirmatory test.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25803295 PMCID: PMC4372418 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Multiple comparisons of log anti-T. pallidum titers in 4 groups with a different stage of genital ulceration in baboons
([CNA] = clinically non-affected (n = 20), [INI] = initial (n = 14), [MOD] = moderate (n = 7), and [SEV] = severe genital ulceration (n = 16); for stage definition see [18]), GU = genital ulceration. Anti-T. pallidum antibody quantification was investigated using the Serodia TP-PA. Kruskal-Wallis test using Dunn’s correction for multiple comparison: CNA vs. SEV mean rank diff. = -30.04, p ≤ 0.0001; CNA vs. MOD mean rank diff. = -19.95, p ≤ 0.05; INI vs. SEV mean rank diff. = -17.56, p ≤ 0.05. (mean ± SEM).
Performance characteristics of the serological tests used in this study, as reported by the manufacturer. Sen = Sensitivity, Spec = Specificity, n.p. = not provided.
| Serodia TP-PA (n) | Espline TP (n) | Syphilitop Optima (n) | Mastafluor FTA-ABS IgG (n) | Mastablot TP IgG (n) | VDRLCHECK CHARBON/ RPR (n) | RPR-100 (n) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100.0% (145) | 100.0% (145) | 100.0% (103) | n.p. | n.p. | 100.0% (50) | n.p. |
|
| 100.0% (935) | 99.7% (932) | 95.0% (100) | n.p. | n.p. | 100.0% (100) | n.p. |
Definitions used to determine the infectious stage of baboons.
| Test | Results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genital Ulceration | / | +/- | +/- | - | +/- | - |
| IHC | / | + (1 of 2) | - | - | - | - |
| PCR | ||||||
|
| / | + (1 of 2) | - | - | - | - |
| Serodia TP-PA | 3 of 5 tests | +/- | + | - | + | - |
| Espline TP | ||||||
| Syphilitop Optima | 3 of 5 tests | +/- | + | - | + | - |
| Mastafluor FTA-ABS IgG | 3 of 5 tests | +/- | + | - | + | - |
| Mastablot TP IgG | 3 of 5 tests | +/- | + | - | + | - |
|
| 3 of 5 tests | +/- | + | - | + | - |
| VDRLCHECK CHARBON/RPR | / | +/- | + | + | - | - |
| RPR-100 | +/- | + | + | - | - | |
|
| / |
|
|
|
|
|
The definition of infection status was based on the outcome of serological (this study) and molecular biological tests [18, S1 Table].
Comparison of treponemal serological tests with the results of the Serodia TP-PA.
| Assay and Result | Serodia TP-PA | p-Value | % Sensitivity (95% CI) | % Specificity (95% CI) | % Pos. pred. value (95% CI) | % Neg. pred. value (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos. | Neg. | ||||||
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Positive | 42 | 1 | < 0.0001 | 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 96.0 (0.797–0.999) | 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 96.0 (0.797–0.999) |
| Negative | 1 | 24 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Positive | 42 | 4 | < 0.0001 | 91.3 (0.792–0.976) | 95.5 (0.772–0.999) | 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 84.0 (0.639–0.955) |
| Negative | 1 | 21 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Positive | 42 | 1 | < 0.0001 | 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 96.0 (0.796–0.999) | 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 96.0 (0.796–0.999) |
| Negative | 1 | 24 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Positive | 41 | 0 | < 0.0001 | 100.0 (0.914–1.000) | 94.7 (0.740–0.999) | 97.6 (0.874–0.999) | 100.0 (0.815–1.000) |
| Negative | 1 | 18 | |||||
Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. Pos. pred. value = positive predictive value, Neg. pred. value = negative predictive value.
Comparison of the serological tests with the consensus of infection status (Table 2).
| Assay and Result | Serodia TP-PA | Espline TP | Syphilitop Optima | Mastafluor FTA-ABS IgG | Mastablot TP IgG | VDRL | RPR-100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 42 | 43 | 43 | 43 | 41 | 10 | 10 |
|
| 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 23 | 25 | 22 | 25 | 19 | 27 | 27 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
|
| 68 | 68 | 68 | 68 | 60 | 39 | 39 |
|
| 97.7 (0.877–0.999) | 100.0 (0.918–1.000) | 100.0 (0.918–1.000) | 100.0 (0.918–1.000) | 100.0 (0.914–1.000) | 83.3 (0.516–0.979) | 83.3 (0.516–0.979) |
|
| 92.0 (0.740–0.990) | 100.0 (0.863–1.000) | 88.0 (0.688–0.975) | 100.0 (0.863–1.000) | 100.0 (0.824–1.000) | 100.0 (0.872–1.000) | 100.0 (0.872–1.000) |
|
| 95.5 (0.845–0.994) | 100.0 (0.918–1.000) | 93.5 (0.821–0.986) | 100.0 (0.918–1.000) | 100.0 (0.914–1.000) | 100.0 (0.692–1.000) | 100.0 (0.692–1.000) |
|
| 95.8 (0.789–0.999) | 100.0 (0.863–1.000) | 100.0 (0.846–1.000) | 100.0 (0.863–1.000) | 100.0 (0.824–1.000) | 93.1 (0.772–0.992) | 93.1 (0.772–0.992) |
|
| 95.6 | 100.0 | 95.6 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 94.9 | 94.9 |
Two-tailed Fisher’s exact test in all serology tests, p < 0.0001. Pos. pred. value = positive predictive value, Neg. pred. value = negative predictive value. Sample size differs because in some cases sample material was on short supply for further tests. For the NTTs only serum was tested and included here. Tests in all other animals were preformed with plasma and can be found in S2 Table.
Crosstab of the results obtained from 57 baboon and 11 control samples.
| Genital Ulceration | CNA | Initial | Moderate | Severe | Negative Control | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 20 | 14 | 7 | 16 | 11 | |||||
| + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | + | - | |
|
| 6 | 14 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 15 | 1 | n/t | n/t |
|
| 2 | 18 | 3 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 9 | n/t | n/t |
|
| 8 | 12 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 6 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 9 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 6 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 6 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 2 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
|
| 2 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
CNA = clinically non-affected.
Fig 2T. pallidum test algorithm for the screening of wild non-treated baboons.
Based on the test performances Espline TP is recommended as the initial screening test followed by a confirmatory test e.g. Mastablot TP IgG that has been identified as most reliable standard. Dashed lines indicate reported results, while continuous lines represent the workflow.